Skip to content
Artwork for Thinking about...
HistorySociety & Culture

Thinking about...

Timothy Snyder

The words we need for the politics of today.

snyder.substack.com
Play
  • 50 episodes
  • Avg 26 min
  • English
Counted on this page — what you have heard stays on this device, so it is not something the list can be paged by.
  • Yesterday · 26 min

    Now We Act: With Senator Richard Blumenthal on the Opportunity of a Lifetime

    Dear Friends, on Monday I spoke live on this platform with five US Senators, and I have been publishing those conversations here this week. This is part of a new series on this platform called Now We Act. Thus far I have spoken to about a dozen Democratic Senators and Representatives, and on this coming Monday we will have about half a dozen more live conversations. If you are a subscriber you will be notified of each live conversation (and when the recordings are released); if you are a paid subscriber you can leave comments and questions, which I will try to integrate. The main question I am raising is of course this: can we get from a major electoral victory to systemic change? My theory of the case, which I presented to Senator Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut, is that the Democrats have won on issues that require systemic change, and that they have a short time to (at the very least) to demonstrate their attempt, through legislation and through invesitgations, that they are in the right sight of the corruption. People recognize that the system is broken, but also recognize that Trump is more broken than the system. This creates a special chance for the Democrats. I was happy to listen to Senator Blumenthal agree that “this is the question of the moment.” Voters have a “deep disillusionment about the system.” He says that “we need to seize the opportunity not only to be against Trump” but more importantly “for programs related to housing, health care, AI.” Senator Blumenthal calls this “the opportunity of a lifetime.” Please listen to what he has to say, and please share. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit snyder.substack.com/subscribe

    • Transcript
  • Friday · 24 min

    Now We Act: With Senator Andy Kim on Health and Democracy

    The Democrats have a large majority in both chambers of Congress, after an historical election. Senator Andy Kim of New Jersey, with whom I had a long conversattion on Monday, is a special elected official, thoughtful, open and humane, with clear plans for health care for the young, and a specific, thoughtful approach to corruption. He understands the connection between daily life and democracy. Can we make a start in January towards the much better country we can become? Please listen and please share. There will be another burst of live conversations on Monday with Representatives and Senators, free to everyone, on this platform. If you are a subscriber, you will get notice of each one; if you are a paid subscriber, feel free to leave your thoughts and questions in the comments of this or any other post, and I will work some of them in. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit snyder.substack.com/subscribe

    • Transcript
  • Thursday · 23 min

    Now We Act: With Senator Mark Kelly on Security and Freedom

    Friends, I am carrying out a series of live conversations with Democratic Senators and Representatives, trying to get an answer to the open question of American politics, and really American life: can Democrats use their extraordinary electoral victory (plus thirteen points nationwide, large majorities in both chambers of Congress, historic individual victories, as in Mississippi) to meet the present crisis and take meaningful steps towards something much better? For me, money in politics is the issue of issues, both because action there would signal to voters that the Democrats really are different than than Trump, different than the system, and better than they have been. Radical campaign finance reform would also make our system far more democratic than it is, and (what comes to same thing) much easier to pass laws that benefit Americans. This was a central subject in Monday’s conversation with Senator Mark Kelly of Arizona. Senator Kelly has faced more than his share of ridiculous abuse from the present administration, chiefly because he has made the obvious point — as a distinguished Navy combat veteran — that soldiers and sailors should not follow illegal orders. This statement was one step, in my view, in safeguarding these elections, and should be understood as such. Senator Kelly has also been outspoken in his support of Ukraine, which is where we begin: there we have an example of people taking great risks for their own freedoms, setting an example and creating possibilities for the rest of us. Just as democracy is connected to domestic prosperity, so it is linked to a reasonable foreign policy. I urge you to listen to Senator Kelly’s views on all of this. This is a recording of one of five conversations from this past Monday. I will release recordings with Senators Blumenthal and Kim these next two days. Next Monday November 16th there will be another five or six live conversations with Representatives and Senators on this platform. These conversations are available to everyone; feel free to share them. If you are a subscriber you will get notifications about all of this. If you are a paid subscriber feel free to leave questions in the comments; I will try to raise some of them with elected officials. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit snyder.substack.com/subscribe

    • Transcript
  • Wednesday · 23 min

    Live with Senator Tammy Baldwin on Recovery

    Friends, the party that was in opposition, the Democrats, has a chance to become a party that moves into history. Will it? A resounding electoral victory does not automatically become a meaningful political victory. In my view, the Democrats have a once-in-a-lifetime chance. They won even though the system is rigged against them; that’s the only time when you can unrig. Democrats got a vote of — let’s call it — relative confidence, as the people who seem less corrupt than Trump, and who might create the conditions under which nothing like his level of self-dealing nihilism can continue. I think they have about six months to convey that they are one the right side of the corruption question, which also means being on the right side of the costs question. You can’t get to affordability without accountability. It was a special pleasure to speak about Wisconsin and the wider world with Senator Tammy Baldwin. Wisconsin is a very special state: the last time I visited, it seemed that it would be stuck in gerrymandered quicksand forever, without meaningful political competition. And yet the state, or its voters and organizers, found a way out: and as of these last elections, Wisconsin Democrats will now have a “trifecta,” Democratic control over both houses of the state legislature as well as the governor’s mansion. This is important in American politics, because one root of the authoritarianism in Washington DC has been fake democracy at the state level. I was pleased to listen to Senator Baldwin accept the proposition that “costs and corruption” are “twin issues” and “place their trust in Democrats to do something about it” — and that this trust will be “short-lived if we don’t deliver.” Senator Baldwin sees ways to keep money from elections (including public financing) and also has an interesting proposal to expand health care and ideas about the restoration of scientific research. As ever I appreciated the Senator’s willingness to join in an unscripted, free-flowing conversation. It was a great pleasure to speak to her and experience her own specific mixture of planning and hope. Please listen and share! I did five of these conversations live on Monday and I will release one recording each morning this week. They are freely available to everyone. If you subscribe to this substack you will get a notice of each live conversation (there will be more live ones next week) and each release of a recording; if you are a paid subscriber feel free to leave questions in the comments and I will work some in. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit snyder.substack.com/subscribe

    • Transcript
  • Tuesday · 20 min

    Now We Act: With Senator Chris Van Hollen on Leadership

    We are now deep into “Now We Act,” a series of live, unscripted conversations with Democratic legislators, who will soon enjoy decisive majorities in both houses of the United States Congress. These conversations, like the one I am releasing now with Senator Chris Van Hollen of Maryland, take place thanks to the generosity and patience of the lawmakers themselves, who are willing to engage in impromptu exchanges about some fundamental questions, and to listen to my views as well as expressing theirs. I’d like to explain why I initiated these. As those of you who have been around me on my American journeys these last six months or so know, I have been confident that the opposition party, the Democrats, would win a big victory in the midterms. I was worried about attempts by Trump allies to disrupt the elections, and am thankful for the efforts of organizers and lawyers around the country that — along with the size of the Democratic victory — made that impossible. My greater concern all along has been that Democrats might fail to transform a huge electoral victory into rapid and meaningful change. I believe that voters have given Democrats a chance, and that Democrats have to take that chance, quickly, radically, demonstratively, showing concern for the daily difficulties people face, and getting on the right side of the issue of corruption. Affordability and accountability are connected, as Americans now understand: you can’t get to the underlying economic issues that have made life unaffordable without breaking the hold of corruption and addressing inequality. Americans think that the system is broken — and they are right — but they also think that Trump is far, far more corrupt than the system — and there they are also right. This is what gives Democrats their once-in-a-lifetime chance: to show that they are better than they have been, to show that they are better than the system, to show that the system can be changed. And it can be — that was the message today from Senator Chris Van Hollen. People have “invested hope” in the Democrats, he said, but they need “to follow through” on health care, data centers, and money in politics. If Democrats don’t — and this is my feeling now — they will quickly lose credibility, and could even collapse as a political party. Their historical success in these elections arose from the hard work of organizers and candidates and the decisions of voters, but it was enabled by a certain historical moment. As Shakespeare has Brutus say in Julius Caesar: “There is a tide in the affairs of men. Which, taken at the flood, leads on to fortune.” My personal sense is that the Democrats have about six months before that tide goes out again. The task is to establish that that they are the party that wants money out of politics and back into citizens’ pockets. I very much appreciated the combination of clear judgement and radical aims demonstrated by Senator Van Hollen in our conversation. We talked about the methods of authoritarians, the need to break normalization, the meaning of the freedom of speech, and the need to see the connections between the abuses of rights and the decline in good opportunities for all of us. It is also worth pondering what Senator Van Hollen has to say about new members and leadership in the Senate at the end of our conversation: “We should not have a coronation.” “I’m listening now to people who are demanding change.” “The new members have demanded change.” These “Now We Act” conversations are freely available to everyone. If you are a subscriber to this substack you will be notified by email when each new live conversation is broadcast and when each recording is released. If you are a paid subscriber you can leave questions in the comments; I will try to bring them up in future sessions. Feel free to share these recordings with others who might be interested. I had four other live conversations with Senators on Monday November 9th (Senators Blumenthal, Baldwin, Kelly, and Kim); I will be posting those recordings each morning this week. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit snyder.substack.com/subscribe

    • Transcript
  • November 8 · 36 min

    Now We Act: With Senator Tina Smith on Unrigging the System

    Senator Tina Smith graciously met with me in Minneapolis just before the election, and just as graciously agree to take part in our first day of conversations with elected officials about how an election becomes a transformation. If you the system is rigged and you lose, you cannot unrig it; if it is rigged and you win anyway, then you have the chance to unrig it. I appreciated her frankness about the need to attend to issues of oligarchy and to listen to the “plea for big bold actions” and formulate a “populist antidote.” Now, she says, “we have to show that we are not just kidding around.” I certainly agree that failure to do this would give authoritarianism its best chance and I appreciated the Senator’s clarity on this point. Senator Smith was also clear on the point that citizens understand that Trump’s corruption is “costing you money”; and that therefore accountability and affordability are connected. It was also a pleasure to acknowledge the special role of Minnesotans took risks to give us the chance to get to this moment. I hope you enjoy this — and will tune in Monday when we continue these conversations with six more US Senators. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit snyder.substack.com/subscribe

    • Transcript
  • November 8 · 21 min

    Now We Act: With Senator Maggie Hassan on Responsive Democracy

    Senator Maggie Hassan of New Hampshire generously joined me on the first day of our new series Now We Act. She defines the large group of new Senators and Representatives as a “coalition of patriots” and speaks to the sense among voters that something essentially un-American was happening under “this corrupt” and “historically failed” president. This leads us to an essential conversation about the relationship between the extravagant corruption of the current administration and possible remedies. Senator Hassan also makes the interesting point that a difference between autocracies (her example is Russia) and democracies is responsiveness. (Which was a theme I was happy to pick up!) I appreciated as well her description of the effect of outside money and dark money and “mass communication strategies that are very opaque.” Everyone I spoke to on Friday agreed that we need radical campaign finance reform; here as elsewhere I appreciated the Senator’s patience as I gave my view of the Supreme Court’s (or its majority’s) misunderstanding of freedom of speech. We touched on some other fundamental issues, including the taxation of the wealthy and the future of Homeland Security and ICE. I hope you find this useful and will tune in Monday as I continue these conversations with half a dozen more US Senators. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit snyder.substack.com/subscribe

    • Transcript
  • November 8 · 23 min

    Now We Act: With Rep. Greg Casar on Passing Great Laws

    Representative Greg Casar of Austin joined me Friday for an energetic conversation that begins with the extraordinary turn in Texas politics. He and others have admirably agreed to unscripted conversations and to listening to my very long questions! The reason I am setting up the big questions is that I think Democrats have an open window, but one that will close in about six months. And that the twin issues of affordability and accountability are really one issue. Congressman Casar right off the bat has several interesting ideas here and affirms the point that Democrats have to move quickly. On campaign finance, he starts from the very sound view that the Supreme Court should not have been legislating the issue of money in the politics in the first place, and explains how the legislative process could work. And I also love the idea of using all of the next hundred weeks to pass ambitious legislation. For this and other reasons I hope you will take the chance to get to know Greg Casar, who chairs the Congressional Progressive Caucus. These conversations will continue on Monday with six US Senators on the list. They are available to everyone. If you are subscribed, you will get an email when each live conversation starts. If you are a paid subscriber, feel free to leave some questions for lawmakers in the comments, and I will try to work some of them in. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit snyder.substack.com/subscribe

    • Transcript
  • November 8 · 30 min

    Now We Act: With Rep. Madeleine Dean on Language and Power

    “My head hurts from smiling,” says Representative Dean, recalling her work with other candidates in Pennsylvania and around the country. She kindly mentioned “On Tyranny,” which led us into a conversation about who has resisted, organized, and opened the door to major change, and what comes next. “We just elected diverse, qualified candidates, people color, people of different faiths,” a huge new class in the House of Representatives. Representative Dean mentions both “affordability and accountability,” which for me are essentially the same issue: you can’t get to kitchen-table issues without going through corruption. Representative Dean speaks at length about getting back the centrality of Congressional power, the power to make laws and “the power of the purse,” which is of course essential. These conversations will continue on Monday, with six US Senators. They are available to everyone. If you are a subscriber, you will get an email notification. If you are a paid subscriber, feel free to leave questions below, and I will try to work them in. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit snyder.substack.com/subscribe

    • Transcript
  • November 7 · 36 min

    Now We Act: With Rep. Seth Magaziner on Ethics and Reform

    Seth Magaziner, Congressman of Rhode Island, agreed to be the very first person to join our new series here called Now We Act. We test the idea that the elections open a window: voters (including people who chose not to vote) see corruption as central, and are waiting to see whether Democrats can get on the right side of this issue. Representative Magaziner sees the Democrats as having a mandate rather than a pat on the pat, and sets the tone for the conversations that followed all day Friday and will continue on Monday. He speaks of a “broader pay-to-play culture” and the need to get money out of campaigns and a “comprehensive set of ethics reforms” as well as getting dark money out of politics and a “much more progressive tax system.” And: “Elon Mush is due” to testify before Congress. Again I want to thank Seth Magaziner and others for agreeing to unscripted conversations on basic subjects — it’s a good sign when our elected representatives are willing to do this. These live conversations continue on Monday with six US senators. If you subscribe you will get an email notice when each one starts; if you are a paid subscriber you can leave questions below and I will try to integrate them into future conversations. These live sessions are available to everyone. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit snyder.substack.com/subscribe

    • Transcript
  • November 7 · 29 min

    Now We Act: With Rep. Ro Khanna on America’s Future

    Friends, I am doing some new live sessions here with Democratic Congresswomen, Congressmen, and Senators under the heading “Now We Act.” The central issue is how we get from change in the legislature to change in life. I have some ideas about this, which these elected officials are kindly willing to hear and discuss. I want to give credit to everyone who has joined these conversations: they are unscripted and free-flowing, and I think all the more interesting for that reason - and not every politician will agree to do such a thing! I am sharing first this recording of a terrific conversation with Rep. Ro Khanna of California, which goes deep into some basic questions of wealth and governance, and conveys very clearly his worldview and his ideas about a better future. And it was fun! Please share this with anyone who is interested. These conversations are available to all. There were five others yesterday the recordings of which I will share over the weekend, and there will be six new live conversations, all with Senators, on Monday November 9th (schedule below). If you are a paid subscriber, feel free to leave comments below, and I will work some of them in to future conversations with lawmakers. Monday’s schedule, as it looks today: This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit snyder.substack.com/subscribe

    • Transcript
  • November 3 · 28 min

    On Power and Joy -- what comes next

    An election-day conversation with Jess Craven about what it means to win, what to do with power, and how to experience victory. The central theme in both policy and politics: to get to affordability you have to go through corruption. The opposition, once they gain power, will have a once-in-a-lifetime change to address the issue of money in elections, inequality, and the self-dealing of the presidential clans. May this be relevant and useful! Please share with others who might be interested or want to be engaged. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit snyder.substack.com/subscribe

    • Transcript
  • November 1 · 30 min

    The Midterms and the Aftermath with Michael Podhorzer

    On a little tour of the Midwest, and very happy to stop to tap the mind of the great Michael Podhorzer on the larger meaning of these midterms and on what must come next. Please have a look and a listen and share! This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit snyder.substack.com/subscribe

    • Transcript
  • October 26 · 32 min

    Before and After the Elections (video)

    What to expect on election day, what to do about it, and what comes after the opposition wins a big victory? The big story right now is that the opposition party, the Democrats, has the chance for a decisive victory that creates conditions for the systemic change this country badly needs. Of course the Trump regime will try to halt this. That is absolutely normal in such historical conditions. And they can be made to fail. And can be mocked. A big enough margin will deter people from cheating for the losing side. And adherence to the rule of law means punishment for those who break the law in elections. Every gambit that cannot be deterred can be defeated. After victory, the new majority should move quickly to signal that it is the party that opposes money in politics, that fights corruption, that will work for economic justice. This would be a once-in-a-lifetime chance. Glenn and I work through all of this. I hope you enjoy watching and listening. Please share with those who will be interested. Thinking about... is a reader-supported publication. Please subscribe. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit snyder.substack.com/subscribe

    • Transcript
  • October 24 · 48 min

    With Michael Weiss on Ukraine, Diplomacy, and Espionage

    Please check out this timely conversation with the investigative journalist Michael Weiss. We are working here to bring you up to date on the changing US policy towards Ukraine, the Russian attacks on Ukrainian civilians following the complete failure of the Russian summer offensive, and the ways the war connects to American domestic politics before the midterm elections. Bonus: get confirmation that the mind and mouth of JD Vance are moved by Russian propaganda. If you find this valuable, please share this with others who will be interested! This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit snyder.substack.com/subscribe

    • Transcript
  • October 15 · 31 min

    Modern Fascism, the Collapse of Truth, and Why Americans Need “Small Courage”

    Dear thinkers: Timothy Snyder joined fellow historian and teacher Sharon McMahon for a sweeping conversation about the state of American democracy, the evolving nature of fascism, and the growing influence of technology and wealth on politics. Below are some thematic highlights and select quotes from Tim during the conversation. I encourage you to watch the conversation in full, as always. I think you’ll learn a lot. How Fascism Is Changing in the 21st Century. Why a Post-Truth Society Is So Dangerous “The fascism is a tool to divide, to divert, to direct people towards a false us and them. Whereas the real us and them is that they have their hands in our wallet.” A Post-Truth Society “A post-truth society is one in which we don’t acknowledge that truth is real.” The Political Power of Tech Billionaires “A lot of people with a lot of means, a lot of wealth and a lot of power are cut off pretty much completely from the world.” The Importance of “Small Courage” “I think it’s very important that we think of courage as something which is small.” For more, continue tuning in here or check out On Tyranny and On Freedom. Thanks, as always, and see you soon Victor This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit snyder.substack.com/subscribe

    • Transcript
  • October 13 · 50 min

    Between the River and the Railroad Tracks

    I am sure many of you will share my enthusiasm for Nicole Fleetwood’s “Between the River and the Railword Tracks,” which is a remarkable micro-history of a beautifully and tragically intense neighborhood, the Second Ward of Hamilton, Ohio, the historically segregated African-American district where Nicole grew up. I came to Nicole’s scholarship through her book on art and mass incarceration, Marking Time, and then we have come to know each other as fellow Ohioans — a theme that comes through in this conversation! Through the recollections of her childhood, we get clearer views of the Black Midwest, on the second half of the twentieth century in the United States, and on the most tender and painful of our national crises. We get to the general though through the particular, through the life of a young person and her family, remembered and told (and researched!) with care and pain and love. The book will be officially released early next month but you can pre-order a copy by pressing the button. TS Syracuse NY 10 October 2026 This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit snyder.substack.com/subscribe

    • Transcript
  • October 10 · 2 min

    Four Wrongs of a Public Execution

    We as Americans are being invited by the Secretary of Defense to view an execution by firing squad over the internet. This is wrong in at least four ways. In the video I explain, and here I summarize. It is wrong psychologically. It looks like revenge. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth has chosen and lost a war against Iran. Given the extraordinary degree of self-promoting bombast by which he described this military adventure, this sorry result is a personal humiliation. It is undisputed that the defendant, Nidal Hasan, committed a horrible crime, and that he deserves punishment. But to rejoice exuberantly in the prospect of the public shooting of a Muslim, as Mr. Hegseth is doing day after day, is to turn personal defeat into a summons for all of us to live inside his personal need for vengeance. It is wrong politically. To livestream an execution will not deter terrorism. It will invite terrorism, as Mr. Hegseth no doubt understands. The deeper political consequence, however, is domestic. The basis of politics in the Trump regime is sado-populism. Rather than offer policy that benefits Americans, Trump uses the government to hurt some, and offer their pain as a spectacle to everyone else. To livestream a public execution is to take that politics to its logical extreme. The federal government would be instructing us to observe, and thus participate in, a public killing. This invitation to us is a major step towards seeing politics only as the pain of others. While execution by firing squad is the endpoint of a judicial proceeding, broadcasting it is to advertise killing is a political transformation. If Americans view, clip, share, and permanently enshrine an American public killing in a million ways on the internet, we will moves towards fascist rituals of violence. It is wrong historically. As Mr. Hegseth will know, public executions in the United States have a particular racial lineage. The lynchings of African Americans were meant to demonstrate that one group is always innocent and another group is always guilty. Lynchings were designed to humiliate the African American who was killed and to terrorize and stigmatize the group to which he belonged. Black men (and women) who were lynched were not (unlike Nidal Hasan) tried before a court of any kind; they were victims of racial terror organized by mobs. The purpose, as in Mr. Hegseth’s planned spectacle, was to involve large numbers of people, young and old, and to normalize a sense of enmity. Although the circumstances are different, to recommence public executions is to invoke a very specific history, and to summon some Americans to a sense of righteous innocence meant to prepare them to kill other Americans. It is wrong ethically. It will not be hard to find external authorities who can help us to see this. The United Nations human rights office can remind us that a public execution is a form of torture. The president of the US Conference of Catholic Bishops can tell us that a livestreamed public execution is a “barbaric promotion of a culture of death.” But we, all of us, all Americans, are being invited to observe and thus participate; the ethics of this are accessible to each of us, personally, as living human beings. The end of life is a mystery, one which arises from the dignity of life. No matter what an individual has done, the end of each life should be respected, for the sake of the dignity of life itself. Thinking about... is a reader-supported publication. Please subscribe. Thanks for reading Thinking about...! This post is public so feel free to share it. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit snyder.substack.com/subscribe

    • Transcript
  • October 8 · 22 min

    Where Do Democrats Go From Here? With Rep. Jake Auchincloss

    Dear thinkers, Tim recently joined Rep. Jake Auchincloss (D-MA) for a Thinking Live conversation. The biggest question during the conversation: where do Democrats go after the midterms? They planned nothing in advance, and the conversation covered a lot. Here are the big themes. Watch the entire conversation above! 1. Win, then act Tim stressed what happens after a win: “My greatest fear is that Democrats win both chambers and then don’t treat it as a victory.” Rep. Auchincloss laid out three priorities: a bipartisan-friendly affordability agenda, accountability for Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, and a serious attack on dark money. On affordability, he said, “if the Republicans want to vote against, shame on them.” 2. The window to get money out of politics Tim sees an unusual opening: “right now we have an unusual open window to get money out of politics,” because Americans currently blame Trump more than the system itself. Rep. Auchincloss backs overturning Citizens United through state corporate charter law, but warned that the climb will be harder than people expect. Even Massachusetts’ attorney general declined his ballot petition on First Amendment grounds. Still, Tim argued the free speech question has to be met head-on: “the purpose of freedom of speech is to enable the powerless to speak to the powerful, not the other way around.” 3. Tie corruption to your wallet Rep. Auchincloss argued that corruption only lands when voters feel it, and used health care as his example. A billionaire with ties to the biggest insurers ran CMS and raised reimbursement rates for his own investors, which means higher premiums for everyone else. Tim’s takeaway: “Getting affordability and democracy together is the key.” 4. Lessons from Hungary, and what patriotism means Rep. Auchincloss pointed to the anti-Orbán coalition as a model for Democrats: relentless focus on corruption, joyful patriotism, and a cross-ideological economic agenda. He added that Democrats need to “talk and act like we love this country,” and that America isn’t blood and soil: “Americans fight for ideas.” Rep. Auchincloss and Tim ran out of time before Iran and Ukraine, so that’s for another conversation. In the meantime, I hope you enjoy their exchange above. Until next time, Victor Thanks for reading Thinking about...! This post is public so feel free to share it. Thinking about... is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit snyder.substack.com/subscribe

    • Transcript
  • October 5 · 7 min

    Basic Political Wisdom (Kharkiv Meditations, 10/10)

    At night last month in Kharkiv, Ukraine, I was moved to record a cycle of thoughts. This is the final one: on basic political wisdom. By that I mean nothing more than a few answers to questions that I get asked a lot, on issues where historical examples, consensus in political science, and experience of recent elections give me some confidence in the answers. This is the video that is most directly relevant to the US midterms; but it also flows naturally from the larger concerns of the previous nine meditations, which were published here in the last couple of days and in September. Please feel free to share this one and all of the others! A last word: thanks to friends in Ukraine who help me to get around and therefore to think. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit snyder.substack.com/subscribe

    • Transcript
Showing 1–20 of 50 episodes