His Tesla Changed the Case: Police Assumptions & Bodycam Gaps
Police thought he was fleeing. His Tesla footage helped tell a different story. Could the situation have been sorted out before it became a nearly two-year criminal case? On this solo episode of Two Cops One Donut, Erik Lavigne examines Kevin Finley’s Winter Springs, Florida, arrest and acquittal. Erik explains why he can understand the officer’s initial interpretation while questioning the assumptions behind it—and what should happen when new evidence challenges an officer’s account. We discuss unmarked traffic stops, driver awareness, supervisor review, and how ego can get in the way of reconsidering a decision. Then we turn to Marc Fogle’s death in Clark County, Washington, and his family’s $27 million tort claim. The discussion examines reporting on a struggle over the deputy’s gun, disputed body-camera interruptions, and why evaluating force and preserving evidence are separate responsibilities. Erik also explains how conversations with viewers changed his position on muting body cameras. His preference: record throughout the call and protect sensitive information through redaction afterward. That leads to a debate about accidental shutoffs, officer privacy, and recording an entire shift. In this episode: 00:00 Welcome and show disclaimer 03:47 What would change your mind? Mailbox searches and context 11:09 Bodycam muting versus redaction 19:33 Kevin Finley: the Tesla footage and acquittal 22:34 Should unmarked police cars make traffic stops? 33:06 What supervisors should check after an arrest 40:27 Officer ego and police training 51:22 Reconsidering an arrest before doubling down 59:06 Marc Fogle and the Clark County claim 01:10:37 Camera interruptions: accident or intentional shutoff? 01:13:16 How viewers changed Erik’s position on muting 01:26:11 Recording every call versus recording an entire shift 01:28:30 Requests for a supervisor: policy and follow-through 01:32:22 What a meaningful public explanation should include What evidence would change your mind—and what should a department explain when a case raises serious questions? Watch the full video and join future livestreams on YouTube at Two Cops One Donut. Subscribe and bring your perspective to the conversation. Contains strong language and discussion of fatal violence. The Clark County claim contains allegations, not court findings. Commentary reflects the host’s views and is not legal advice. send us a message! twocopsonedonut@yahoo.com Support the show Please see our Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/c/TwoCopsOneDonut Join our Discord!! https://discord.gg/BdjeTEAc *Send us a message! twocopsonedonut@yahoo.com 🔗 Visit us at TwoCopsOneDonut.com & https://www.thedonut.tv/ 📧 Contact us at twocopsonedonut@yahoo.com 🎧 Subscribe to us on Apple, Spotify, and Amazon Music at “2 Cops 1 Donut” Donate Here: https://buymeacoffee.com/twocopsonedonut 🔔 *Don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe for more insightful discussions on law enforcement and community safety!* 💬 *Join the conversation in the comments below!* #TwoCopsOneDonut #PublicSafety #ErikLavigne #firtsresponders Our partners: Ghost Patch: tell them Two Cops One Donut sent you and get free shipping on Flex Shield orders! GhostPatchCustoms.com Insight LPR license plate recognition technology provides 24/7 real-time insight for homes, businesses and neighborhoods. Protect what matters most! Visit https://insightlpr.com/ Retro Rifle: Official Clothing of Two Cops One Donut. Hawaiian Shirts, Guns, and Pop-Culture! head to Retro-Rifle.com tell them we sent ya!
- Transcript
- Chapters
