A New Plan for Passenger Rail in Central Texas... Again
A shiny new rail proposal just dropped for the Austin to San Antonio corridor and the details are going to spark arguments. The headline sounds great: “higher speed” passenger rail along SH 130 with top speeds around 125 mph and a trip time near an hour. But the route starts at Austin’s airport, ends near the Alamodome, and completely skips two of the biggest demand generators between the metros: San Marcos and New Braunfels. If you care about real ridership, downtown access, and making rail competitive with I-35 traffic, those choices are not minor. We walk through why local leaders are drawn to the SH 130 idea anyway, especially the promise of avoiding negotiations with Union Pacific. Then we dig into the hard parts: why more than half the line may need to be elevated, how that drives the roughly $13.5 billion cost, and why “just upgrade the existing tracks” runs into the same wall again and again. Union Pacific freight rail has customers to serve, schedules to protect, and very little incentive to welcome more passenger trains. If Texas can spend tens of billions on highway expansion, what would it take to fund a regional rail spine in the Texas Triangle? Subscribe, share this with a friend who sits on I-35, and leave a review and a comment with the plan you’d choose. Send us Fan Mail Support the show
- Transcript
- Chapters