Skip to content
Artwork for tiny sparks, big changes
Health & FitnessAlternative HealthMental Health

tiny sparks, big changes

Trisha Wolfe

tiny sparks: finding your way in the world by building your resilience. all things trauma, nervous system regulation, intellectualization, people pleasing, perfectionism, and more.

trishawolfe.substack.com
Play
  • 20 episodes
  • fortnightly
  • Avg 16 min
  • English
  • September 19 · 15 min

    Nothing Is Personal

    This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit trishawolfe.substack.com Hello and welcome back to our book club read-along of Are You Mad at Me? If you’re new here, I release a new podcast episode every two weeks where we deep-dive into this book together. You can also listen on Spotify & Apple Music. These episodes are meant to help translate theory into everyday language and to connect the science to real life, real patterns, and real change. We also gather twice during each book for live meetings where you can connect with others, share reflections, and ask questions in real time! This book takes us deep into fawning, one of the survival strategies so many of us developed in childhood to stay connected and safe. It helps explain why we learned to manage other people’s emotions instead of feeling our own, and how patterns like people-pleasing, overfunctioning, and perfectionism make so much sense when we understand where they came from, and how they can change. If you’ve been wanting to go deeper into this work, becoming a paid subscriber gives you access to the full book club experience. That includes our live sessions, ongoing discussions, and the complete archive of past reads, such as Unlocking the Emotional Brain, No Bad Parts, Healing Developmental Trauma, and Adult Children of Emotionally Immature Parents. Your support makes this space possible, and I’m grateful you’re here and reading along with me. This week, we’re reading a chapter on taking things personally and how our past experiences shape the meaning we make about things in the present. If you’re curious about doing a deep dive into how to create transformational change in your life, check out my new offering: The Transformation Lab. If you’re someone who reads all the books, tries every type of therapy, can analyze themselves better than Freud, but still can’t seem to change, then come join me for an experiment in transformation. As you read or listen, you can be curious about these reflection questions: 1. What’s a comment or judgment that you tend to take quite personally? What part of you is being activated by it? What is your brain predicting would happen if you didn’t take it personally and just let it go and moved on? 2. What does this part of you need to feel safe? What feels soothing to this part of you? (0:00 - 0:29) Hello and welcome back to our book club read-along of Are You Mad at Me? where we are diving into all things fawning and people-pleasing. This week we’re looking at chapter seven called Nothing is Personal and Other Terrifying Liberating Truths. If you’re new here, welcome to our book club where we read through various therapy and self-help books and I help translate them into how to use them in your daily lives to make long-lasting transformational change.

  • September 5 · 14 min

    This is exhausting - how trauma impacts the body

    This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit trishawolfe.substack.com Hello and welcome back to our book club read-along of Are You Mad at Me? If you’re new here, I release a new podcast episode every two weeks where we deep-dive into this book together. You can also listen on Spotify & Apple Music. These episodes are meant to help translate theory into everyday language and to connect the science to real life, real patterns, and real change. We also gather twice during each book for live meetings where you can connect with others, share reflections, and ask questions in real time! This book takes us deep into fawning, one of the survival strategies so many of us developed in childhood to stay connected and safe. It helps explain why we learned to manage other people’s emotions instead of feeling our own, and how patterns like people-pleasing, overfunctioning, and perfectionism make so much sense when we understand where they came from, and how they can change. If you’ve been wanting to go deeper into this work, becoming a paid subscriber gives you access to the full book club experience. That includes our live sessions, ongoing discussions, and the complete archive of past reads, such as Unlocking the Emotional Brain, No Bad Parts, Healing Developmental Trauma, and Adult Children of Emotionally Immature Parents. Your support makes this space possible, and I’m grateful you’re here and reading along with me. This week, we’re reading a chapter on how fawning and other adaptive survival strategies impact our bodies, and ways we might reconnect with safety and presence. If you’re curious about doing a deep dive into how to create transformational change in your life, check out my new offering: The Transformation Lab. If you’re someone who reads all the books, tries every type of therapy, can analyze themselves better than Freud, but still can’t seem to change, then come join me for an experiment in transformation. As you read or listen, you can be curious about these reflection questions: 1. What’s your relationship to your body? Has it felt like a safe place in which to exist? 2. Close your eyes and see if you can notice just one or two sensations in your body. Describe them.

  • August 22 · 14 min

    Emotions aren’t a problem

    This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit trishawolfe.substack.com Hello and welcome back to our book club read-along of Are You Mad at Me? If you’re new here, I release a new podcast episode every two weeks where we deep-dive into this book together. You can also listen on Spotify & Apple Music. These episodes are meant to help translate theory into everyday language and to connect the science to real life, real patterns, and real change. We also gather twice during each book for live meetings where you can connect with others, share reflections, and ask questions in real time! This book takes us deep into fawning, one of the survival strategies so many of us developed in childhood to stay connected and safe. It helps explain why we learned to manage other people’s emotions instead of feeling our own, and how patterns like people-pleasing, overfunctioning, and perfectionism make so much sense when we understand where they came from, and how they can change. If you’ve been wanting to go deeper into this work, becoming a paid subscriber gives you access to the full book club experience. That includes our live sessions, ongoing discussions, and the complete archive of past reads, such as Unlocking the Emotional Brain, No Bad Parts, Healing Developmental Trauma, and Adult Children of Emotionally Immature Parents. Your support makes this space possible, and I’m grateful you’re here and reading along with me. This week, we’re reading a chapter on learning to be with emotions and to be curious about the messages they might have for us, rather than needing to fawn or freeze and shut our emotions down. If you’re curious about doing a deep dive into how to create transformational change in your life, check out my new offering: The Transformation Lab. If you’re someone who reads all the books, tries every type of therapy, can analyze themselves better than Freud, but still can’t seem to change, then come join me for an experiment in transformation. As you read or listen, you can be curious about these reflection questions: 1. What’s your current relationship to uncomfortable emotions like anger, sadness, and fear? How do you usually deal with them? 2. Recall a recent time when you felt an emotion that felt difficult. What was it telling you?

  • August 7 · 19 min

    Inner attachment and curiosity

    This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit trishawolfe.substack.com Trisha Wolfe: Hello and welcome. We’re just getting started. I just started the recording and so if you are here and you don’t want to be on the recording, you are more than welcome to turn off your camera and you can ask any question you would like in the chat and I’ll just read it out to the group. But thanks so much for joining whether you’re here live or watching the recording for a little group meeting where we can talk about the book we’re reading. Are you mad at me? all about fawning and people pleasing. Of course, I’m happy to answer questions about books from the past book clubs too. More general questions you have. I am really enjoying this book. You know, some of the books we’ve read have been quite academic. You know, just coming off unlocking the emotional brain, which I love, but is a quite heavy academic text. It’s really nice to read this one, too, which I think does a great job of taking these really complex ideas and putting them into simpler, easy to apply methods. 00:01:08 Trisha Wolfe: So, it’s nice to have a little mix. You know, we read healing developmental trauma, which is more academic, no bad parts, which is a little more for the individual. Adult children of emotionally immature parents, same for the individual, and then unlocking the emotional brain. Back to Are You Mad at Me? So, we’ve really gotten to have quite a wide variety, which is so much fun. I do have a question someone sent in that I’m going to discuss, but since you’re here live, are there any questions any of you have? And again, you’re welcome to put it in the chat or just ask it with your video off or whatever you would like to do. But since you’re here, I would love to answer any questions you might have. And there’s no pressure. Okay. Well, if questions come up as we go, you’re more than welcome to ask them. Usually, this time is a time for me to answer a question. So, I can always talk a little bit about the book if I’d like, but please feel free to ask anything. 00:02:13 Trisha Wolfe: It doesn’t have to be related to this book. But the question that we had that someone was talking about from the most recent episode where I was talking about this idea of if you remember chapter 4 was about you are not your thoughts. So it was about noticing this inner voice and talking about some of these ways that we can start to observe for example the inner critic and challenge our perception and kind of not be as fearful about our thoughts. And then moving to soothing and labeling what’s happening. And you might remember Meg uses an acronym called nicer. And nicer stands for notice, invite, curiosity, embrace, and return. So she uses this throughout the book. And this is her process of observing. So first starting with noticing, right? Maybe you’re noticing that you’re overthinking. Then you invite, meaning you let the experience be there. For many of us who have a history of attachment failures and developmental ruptures, we might get scared and want to push away the experience, which makes a lot of sense. 00:03:18 Trisha Wolfe: But eventually, we get to a place where we can allow the thoughts, the feelings, the body sensations to be there. We bring in some curiosity and we might notice what part of us has been activated, what feeling is here. Can I put a label on this? that we embrace, you know, we bring that part of us in and then we return to the present, whether that’s feeling the seat underneath of us or looking around us. So, I was talking about in the episode this idea of inner attachment, you know, of how we can give ourselves transformational experiences with how we relate to ourselves rather than trying to counteract ourselves. So, just to refresh your memory, counteractive strategies are things that are managerial. They are often behavioral, whether it’s trying to manage our behaviors themselves or manage our cognitions or manage our emotions. And they have a time and a place, right? When we’re doing this depth work where we’re working on some of these deeper patterns, we need usually to have some counteractive tools for stabilization, which might mean settling ourselves back down, which might mean feeling the chair underneath of us, which might mean learning how to challenge our thoughts. 00:04:26 Trisha Wolfe: But all those things are counteractive, meaning they’re trying to go against a predictive pattern that the brain has. So the brain is predicting if I feel my feelings, people will not love me and they will pull away from me. And so if we notice that happening and we might say, “Hey, you’re allowed to have feelings. It’s okay. Let’s sit with the feeling.” That’s attempting to counteract, that’s attempting to show the brain like, “This isn’t true. You can do this anyway.” And there’s a time and a place. But we’re also curious about transformational experiences of getting to the root of that predictive patterning, getting to the implicit emotional learning. If you remember from a mocking the emotional brain so that we can update that through memory reconsolidation. So in are you mad at me? There’s a mix of counteractive techniques and transformational techniques. And what I was talking about is we don’t always have to have a good external response for it to be a new experience for the brain. For it to be an experience that can update old learnings. 00:05:28 Trisha Wolfe: So the example I always kind of use is if you go you go get a coffee and you see the barista has made your drink with cow’s milk. You can’t have cow’s milk. You ordered it with oat milk. The idea would be, well, this is a great time to try on having needs, having boundaries. You can let the barista know that they didn’t make your drink correctly. They’ll update it. All will be fine. Well, we can’t promise that. First of all, we don’t know if the barista might be having a horrible day and might yell at you or kick you out or whatever it is. But more importantly, the response of the barista isn’t required for it to update a learning in our brain. Because if we go in and we say, “Hey, sorry. I can’t have cow’s milk. I asked for oat milk.” And the barista says, “How dare you speak to me that way? Get out of here.” It can still be a new experience for parts of us who feel 00:06:17 Trisha Wolfe: we’re not afraid to have needs when it comes to how we relate to ourselves, how we observe the experience. So if we leave of this this barista kind of going off on us when we tried to have a simple meal of a drink we paid for, we might start to go into like, see, you can never get it right. you really can’t ask for what you need because everyone’s just going to attack you or you must not have asked for it in the right way. This is why you shouldn’t even try. You always mess everything up. And that’s part of the learning, right? Having needs means people will get upset at me. People get upset at me because I’m too much. Kind of becomes this self-fulfilling prophecy. But the way we can be curious about implementing this observation that Meg is talking about and you’ve heard me talk about quite a bit is to notice what’s happening and then to get curious with ourselves of how we relate to and treat ourselves. If we start going down the like you always mess everything up train, we can pause and we can say, “Hey, this really sucks. That barista was really rude and I really don’t feel very good right now. 00:07:21 Trisha Wolfe: That was a really hurtful experience for me and I actually am allowed to have my needs I think but more importantly I can be with what I’m feeling right now which is sad and confused and angry and hurt and just noticing the feeling and letting ourselves be in that experience. So even though the other person didn’t say of course you’re allowed to have means I’ll fix your drink. We can still be with like, wow, that did not go the way I liked and I’m allowed to be upset with the way it went, but my life isn’t in danger. My primary relationships are not in danger. I’m not going to be voted off the island. That’s really the experience we’re trying to give our brain because now the primary attachment relationship is not with our caregivers, our partners, whoever it is. It’s us to us. So when I was talking about this inner attachment, there was a question about these interactions and how sometimes the way we treat ourselves can be soothing or transformational or counteractive. And so this person asked, “In your experience, have those genuinely soothing interactions created a mismatch experience for those parts? Does just being met with genuine love and attention allow any part no matter the 00:08:34 Trisha Wolfe: manifestation to have a corrective experience? So this is a great question and the answer is sort of like it’s not that simple but also yes. When I think about doing this work with individuals the way we treat ourselves and our inner attachment is foundational to the work. So whatever parts we identify and remember what do we mean by parts? We mean schemas, we mean survival strategies, we mean implicit emotional learnings. Really, what we mean is a bundle of predictive patterns in our brain. So, no matter what part you’re dealing with, intellectualizer, people pleaser, perfectionist, critic, etc. Part of the foundational experience of how we update that learning is us learning to observe and respond to that part of us. Because so often when we’re trying to manage ourselves, for example, if we try to say like, “Oh, well, you just feel anxious about that. You don’t need to overthink it.” Now, stop overthinking. You know, look around the room, name three things you see, go distract yourself, whatever. Again, there’s a time and a place for that. 00:09:43 Trisha Wolfe: But what we’re doing is we’re trying to push that part of us away. We’re trying to manage that part and say, “You shouldn’t be feeling this way right now. Everything’s fine. You shouldn’t be thinking this way right now. Everything’s fine. We need to manage ourselves.” But what’s really underneath is turning and looking at like how do you feel about this part of you, this experience you have where you get anxious and you overthink things. What feeling might be underneath of there? What did you learn about treating yourself when you’re scared or anxious? How did your parents, your teachers, etc. treat you when you were scared and anxious? How have partners and friends in your adult life treated you when you were scared and anxious or hurt? Because what we’re really curious about is if we can explore and play around with how we treat ourselves, then that goes into the world when we’re interacting with other people because we can never promise ourselves that the outcome we get from the world will be the good outcome. 00:10:40 Trisha Wolfe: So many times when people hear this idea that like you need new experiences to update your nervous system, they want to jump to taking action. They want to say, “Okay, I need a new experience. Then I’m just going to go set this need. I’m going to go reach out to this person. I’m going to set a boundary. I’m going to make myself do the scary thing.” Again, there’s a time and a place for exposing ourselves to the scary thing. But you’re jumping to the action before you’ve done the work to identify what learning are you even trying to address. What part of you is even popping up in these moments? What emotion, body, sensation, story does that part of you hold? and how do you respond to and treat that part of you? So, is it entirely internal? Like we can just completely update all of our learnings from the way we teach ourselves. Well, no, because we’re in the world and so we’re always interacting with the world. 00:11:32 Trisha Wolfe: And yes, of course, part of it is connecting with ourselves so that we can connect to others. But I do view that internal mismatch experience as the foundation. And it’s very often a safe place to start when we’re told we have to heal in community and connection. So you have to go out and find people who can give that to you. It’s correct. We are made to be in connection. We are pack animals. We are made to have connection and community. But when all of your trauma centers around attachment and relational connection, you usually don’t even have a strong connection to yourself. And so when you go to try to seek these interactions with others, you will go into the criticism, the overanalyzing, the anxiety, the fear, the panic because you have not yet developed the new lenses to even see relationships as safe. So, I hope that helps understand that like these internal mismatch experiences are necessary and often the best place to start because no one else is involved. 00:12:39 Trisha Wolfe: We do want to move to having other people involved, but other people are very unpredictable. We can usually gather enough data about ourselves to start to learn to predict what’s going to come, the prediction our brain is making and how we want to be responded to. It stacks, right? Because if part of what we want is for someone to be there with us when we’re anxious. We never got that. We yearn for this connection, this protective energy, etc., then us learning how to give that to ourselves by being compassionate sounds good. You might think the mismatch experience is us being compassionate to ourselves. But it can start to stack and we can say, well, being compassionate to myself brings up another learning which says, I can’t be kind to myself because I’m actually secretly a very bad human. and if I’m kind to myself, I won’t be trying so hard all the time and everyone will find out that I’m bad. So, we we kind of find one learning and then it pings pongs to another learning and we’re almost looking for what is the most accessible place to start. 00:13:36 Trisha Wolfe: So, when we read about this idea of being compassionate toward the critic, yes, love it. That’s an internal mismatch experience. But is it even safe to be compassionate toward yourself? Is the critic a loadbearing wall, quote unquote, in your survival system? Is it something you learned you had to do to be safe and alive in the world? Then self-compassion becomes a counteractive tool. It becomes you trying to go against your brain’s survival system. Please know that I am not anti-self-compassion. I’m incredibly pro self-compassion. But we can’t start with self-compassion and assume that it’s just a learnable skill. Self-compassion can be learned like any other behavior. But if it’s counteracting a predictive survival learning that says I have to maintain my attachment by criticizing myself all the time so that no one finds out I’m a bad person, for example, then you have to work with that before you could ever like you you have to even consider the possibility of neutrality before you would ever be able to move towards self-compassion. 00:14:38 Trisha Wolfe: That’s why when you see people with this very strong inner critic and they and their intellectualizers, they know everything about self-compassion. They even say it to themselves. They can say all the words. They sound super adult. You know, they sit in their self-compassion meditation, but they don’t see a change. When push comes to shove, they will go back to criticizing themselves. That’s because you’re not getting at the core. Right? So, you know me, I love a long-winded answer, but that’s kind of my long- winded answer to why internal experiences are key. And we don’t need to worry too much about the tools. The tools come later. You’ll be ready for self-compassion the moment you feel compassionate towards yourself, if that makes sense. Like the first moment you consider that maybe possibly potentially you’re not a bad person at your core, but you lived in an environment where you had to be responsible for everyone else’s experiences. Maybe just that moment of noticing that and saying, “Whoa, maybe that is possible.” That’s your first little drop of self-compassion. 00:15:39 Trisha Wolfe: It doesn’t have to be this like I honor my inner critic and I love this part of me. If that resonates with you and it genuinely sinks through the layers and feels good, that’s amazing. But what we have to be so careful with, especially if you’re here because you like my Intellectualizer content, child consciousnesses can walk like an adult and talk like an adult, but they are not adult. They are not embodied. So we can say the words of compassion, of presence, of curiosity, of noticing. But when you say it, you have to pause and notice. How does it really feel when I say this to myself? How does it really feel when I sink through the layers? Because cognitively you might love self-compassion and eat it up because you know it’s the good or right thing to do. And some part of your brain might believe it’s true. But again, those deep implicit emotional learnings, if we sit with it for a moment, will come up and say, “Well, no, you’re not allowed to do that.” And now I’m going to make you really numb and go take on another project or now I’m going to make 00:16:42 Trisha Wolfe: you scroll on your phone for 9 hours or whatever the brain does to protect us. Yeah. So that’s why, you know, as Meg is talking here about observing ourselves, and you know, with these books, they’re short, right? So they have to put a lot of information in a short period of time. what she’s done here in chapter 4, what she’s laid out here could be the work of years and that would be totally normal if you had developmental trauma. It’s not hopeless. All of those years will have steps forward. But I just want you to understand the reality of working with some of these learnings. Now, when we can get to the root of the learning, you might remember from unlocking the emotional brain, they can reorganize quite quickly. But when you really have grown up in developmental trauma, it’s like a big tangled web of yarn. So when you pull one learning, another learning pulls, right? They’re all tangled up within there. So that’s why we might not see that kind of spontaneous updating magic that we read in some of the cases of unlocking the emotional brain and why we always always always come back to that observing the metacognition. 00:17:43 Trisha Wolfe: If you’ve listened to all five or six books with me, you’re like, is she going to talk about observing again? Yeah, because it’s like the number one thing. and and it’s such important work to tease apart true observation with this analytical intellectualizer part that sounds adult and can say all the right words. So that’s really my challenge and curiosity for you. You know when you get to this section at the end here about nicer where if you want to try this on try it on more as an experiment rather than as a thing you must carry out. Right? So when you notice that your mind starts spiraling and you’re overthinking, just noticing that that could be as far as you get. What happens when you notice that? What is your instinct to do in that moment? How do you feel toward yourself? How do you feel about the world? What emotion is happening? How does your body feel? What is the next impulsive behavior you want to take? 00:18:40 Trisha Wolfe: What feels right about overthinking and ruminating? What does it feel like would happen if you woke up tomorrow and you could never ever ruminate or overthink again? We turned off the gene. Wait for the part of you that’s like, “Yes, yes, that’s what I’m dreaming of.” And then let it sink through the layers and wait for the part of you that’s like, “That would be so dangerous. I would miss something. I would get hurt or someone I love would get hurt or everyone would find out that I’m secretly this bad, horrible person. Whatever it is, that’s enough. That’s the process of this internal attachment. I don’t think I’ve talked about this in the book club yet, but I’ve been talking a little bit on Instagram and Tik Tok about what it’s like to grow up with parents who love you as best they can, but were never curious about your internal world. So, they might say, “How was school?” or they might, you know, take you to your soccer games, but they never really were curious about your emotions, your hopes, your dreams, what was happening inside of you, how it felt when X thing happened, how it felt when your friend moved away, etc. And that can happen with parents who are stressed, who don’t have enough money, who are emotionally immature, who have their own trauma. 00:19:49 Trisha Wolfe: And then you never learn that it’s safe to be curious about your internal world. And so that’s part of this, too. This inner attachment update is really learning to be curious about yourself rather than manage yourself. And so that’s why I say with this book and with every book, whatever the tools are that are being introduced, we put them in our toolbox of experiments of curiosities rather than things we must implement. Right? If you need counteractive tools, use counteractive tools. But don’t lose sight of the relationship to yourself, the curiosity about your experience, and getting more to the root of how all of your behaviors are solutions to some deeper experience. So, that was a wow, I really made that answer last 20 minutes. So, that was a very in-depth answer to that question, but I think it’s it’s really nuanced and so much therapeutic content online because we’re trying to make it as accessible as possible doesn’t have room for nuance. In a 90-cond TikTok, there’s not room to understand this kind of nuance.

  • July 25 · 27 min

    You are not your thoughts - Are you mad at me? Chapter 4

    Hello and welcome back to our book club read-along of Are You Mad at Me? If you’re new here, I release a new podcast episode every two weeks where we deep-dive into this book together. You can also listen on Spotify & Apple Music. These episodes are meant to help translate theory into everyday language and to connect the science to real life, real patterns, and real change. We also gather twice during each book for live meetings where you can connect with others, share reflections, and ask questions in real time - our next live meeting has moved to Sunday, August 2nd at 11 am EDT so that we have a few more chapters under our belt before we meet (a recording will be available if you can’t attend live!). If you’d like to learn more about getting unstuck and making lasting change in your life, join my upcoming class: 5 Steps to Change on Sunday, July 26th. This book takes us deep into fawning, one of the survival strategies so many of us developed in childhood to stay connected and safe. It helps explain why we learned to manage other people’s emotions instead of feeling our own, and how patterns like people-pleasing, overfunctioning, and perfectionism make so much sense when we understand where they came from, and how they can change. If you’ve been wanting to go deeper into this work, becoming a paid subscriber gives you access to the full book club experience. That includes our live sessions, ongoing discussions, and the complete archive of past reads, such as Unlocking the Emotional Brain, No Bad Parts, Healing Developmental Trauma, and Adult Children of Emotionally Immature Parents. Your support makes this space possible, and I’m grateful you’re here and reading along with me. This week, we’re reading a chapter on learning to observe our thoughts, emotions, and body sensations and get curious about the story they tell rather than getting hooked into them and believing they are 100% true in the present. As you read or listen, you can be curious about these reflection questions: 1. Take a moment to imagine your inner critic. What does it look like? Maybe it’s your scared younger self, or maybe it’s a character who represents your younger self. How is criticizing yourself a solution? What would happen if you didn’t criticize yourself? 2. Recall a time when your anxious thoughts told you a story that wasn’t true in the present. How might those thoughts have been trying to protect you? What did you learn in the past that might be coming up here in the present? (0:00 - 2:11) Hi and welcome back to our read-along of Are You Mad At Me? where we are deep diving into fawning, people-pleasing, perfectionism, intellectualizing, and all the different survival strategies that develop when we grow up in environments with emotionally immature caregivers, attachment ruptures, and environmental failures. This week we will be diving into chapter four called You Are Not Your Thoughts. We know for many of us who grew up in these environments that our brain continues to make predictions into the present about what has happened in the past. So even if we know as adults that we can feel our feelings and we won’t be hurt if other people can’t see them and respond to them, our brain still predicts that feeling our feelings is going to make people upset, it’s going to make everyone tense, it’s going to make mom and dad fight with each other. So we feel a lot of anxiety, numbness, shutdown whenever we have feelings that we might deem as unacceptable, whenever we have needs, whenever we make mistakes. Those all come from those past predictions that our brain is using to predict the present and the future. Learning how to observe, which you well know if you’ve listened to my content, is my belief the number one most important thing, the foundation for all work of healing from developmental trauma, is learning how to observe. And this book is going to go a little bit more into how to observe your thoughts. Now a quick note before we begin, I am going to be doing a mini podcast series with another creator who specializes in working with women who feel stuck in their lives, who have a loud inner critic, who maybe grew up in very rigid or controlling environments, and who struggle with intellectualization, perfectionism, self-criticism. And we’re going to be looking at some of those major issues and how to get unstuck. So if you have questions, if you resonate with that description, and you would like to know specifically, how do I address this issue? Or how do I get unstuck from this issue? Please feel free to respond to this email or leave a comment as we are shaping up those episodes. We would love to know what you would like to hear about learning how to meet yourself, get unstuck, and move toward the life you want. (2:11 - 5:54) So as we start this chapter, we will see that Meg has a very similar mindset to me, which is that our thoughts and our experiences are not something to try to fix. So as you can see, as we start this chapter, Meg has a very similar insight to me, which is that awareness, aka observing, is an incredibly important part of healing and getting back into our lives. And so it’s really important as we explore this chapter that we remember a lesson we learned in our last book, Unlocking the Emotional Brain, about counteractive behaviors versus transformational experiences. So in counteractive behaviors, what we’re essentially trying to do is to counteract our brain with willpower, with habits, with behavioral management. And so what that can look like is tools, tricks, and strategies to try to convince yourself that what’s happening is okay. So if you have the thought that making a mistake means everyone will hate you, everyone will be upset with you, you’ll lose your job, or whatever it is, a behavioral approach might be to give yourself evidence and say, well, you made a mistake before and nothing happened. It might be to try to settle yourself down and say, it’s okay to make a mistake, it’s okay to feel anxious. All of those things are attempting to counteract a story your brain is telling, a prediction your brain is making, that says making a mistake will upset everyone around me. I could lose my connections, I could lose everything. And there’s a time and a place for counteractive approaches, counteractive approaches where we try to manage the anxiety, the thought, whatever it might be, because we want to be able to live our lives. But we know in the long run, from all the science we read in Unlocking the Emotional Brain, we can’t just use counteractive approaches. Because then for the rest of our lives, we’re really going to have to use a lot of management, a lot of willpower. And there’s going to be some white knuckling time where we’re trying to counteract our brain. Instead, while we’re using counteractive techniques to try to get a little space in the present day, we also want to be using transformational techniques that come from the Unlocking the Emotional Brain again, where we’re observing ourselves, but we’re also getting clear about the underlying story, learning part, schema that is present in that story, so that we can use processes like memory reconsolidation, where we give ourselves a new experience to update that learning. So I know it sounds a little esoteric, like what does that really mean a transformational experience? And if you weren’t with us for the last book, I really invite you to go back and listen to some of those episodes. But we’re going to be curious in this chapter as we practice noticing and observing where things might feel counteractive, which is just fine, and where we might be able to dig a little deeper to offer ourselves a transformational approach. And so we know we often have so much urgency to want to fix ourselves, to get rid of that loud, anxious inner voice. But again, that is counteractive. Instead, we want to meet that part of us, meet that voice, get curious about how a loud, anxious inner voice is a solution. What is it a solution to? What is the prediction our brain is making that says, if I’m not constantly ruminating, analyzing, hypervigilant, everything around me will fall apart, or everything in my life will be dangerous, or my parents won’t love me anymore, I won’t be okay. But we’re really going to get curious in this chapter about meeting these parts of us. Right? So as Meg talks about in this chapter, thoughts are not the ultimate truth. We know that many thoughts will come in and out of our brain doesn’t mean that it’s true. Some of you might already say, yeah, yeah, I know that. (5:54 - 9:48) But for some of us, that can be a lot to come to terms with, especially if our thoughts were our safe place. Analyzing and thinking was a place we could feel like we had some sense of control, and feel like we could know what was going to come next. So when we start to recognize, our thoughts are just our thoughts. They’re a piece of the pie, thoughts, emotions, body sensations, behaviors, impulses. These are all generated by those predictive patterns in our brain that’s trying to create context to help us respond. What that means is when a situation happens in our present day life, our brain is very, very, very quickly filing through all the experiences we’ve had in our lives that it’s already cataloged to say, how should I best respond to this to feel good, to maintain connection, and to stay safe? To help us best respond, our brain will generate that same context. Again, it’ll bring up the stories and thoughts, the emotions, and the body sensations to help us respond. What that means is what’s happening in the present is not always accurate based on the present. It doesn’t mean it’s not true. It doesn’t feel true to us, but it’s often the past landing onto the present. So thoughts are just thoughts. We don’t have to always buy into them, but rather we can be curious about them. So if we have this idea, this thought that comes in that says, I’m unlovable, and I’ll be alone forever, we can recognize that that’s likely the past landing onto the present, but it’s a thought that we will get much more hooked into because connection is at play. And if connection is at play and attachment is at play, us never being lovable, then our brain feels like our survival is at stake, our safety is at stake. So of course, the context around that thought might be that you feel really anxious. You start to guilt yourself to try to be better. You try to manage yourself. That context is very strong, and it really tries to elicit a response from us versus the thought, I’m worthy of being loved exactly as I am, including my messy parts. We might not have a basis for that thought. When it enters into our brain, our brain says, no, that’s not true. What’s true is I’m unlovable. If I think that I’m worthy of being loved exactly as I am, then I have to feel and accept all the parts of me that are angry, sad, and hurt that I didn’t get to feel loved as I was in my childhood or in my relationship or whatever it was. So the context that comes up from that thought will say, this thought that I am worthy is actually unsafe, because it’s trying to counteract the idea that I’m not worthy, that I always need to be trying hard. And that is the idea that keeps me safe and loved. So I hope you see it creates a little bit of a loop inside of our mind. So instead of trying to convince ourselves that we’re worthy exactly as we are of being loved, instead, we’re being curious and observing, where did we learn that we were unlovable? What feels like it would happen if we believed we were loved, we were worthy of being loved? What would it be like to walk through the world in that way? And your brain might come in and say, well, you’d be too cocky, or you’d, you know, you’d make a mistake anyway, and then you’d find out it wasn’t true. So it’s much safer to just hold the idea that you’re not worthy of being loved. tiny sparks - trisha wolfe is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. That’s what we’re continuing to emphasize here is just this observation and getting deeper into the layers. So we know, again, that rumination, that hyper vigilance, those anxious thoughts, it plays a role. It gives us a faux sense of control, an illusion of control. And it’s something that developed in environments that felt outside of our control. So we know thinking about the worst case scenarios doesn’t actually alleviate our stress. It increases anxiety, it increases stress, it increases our bracing. But oftentimes, when we were young, that’s all we had. Right? All we could do is go up into our brain and analyze and ruminate. Because the environment around us didn’t feel safe, it didn’t feel like our emotions could be met. (9:49 - 22:48) And so it’s a way that we learn to manage and try to keep ourselves safe, to try to hold on for a sense of control at all costs. And that’s really what fawning is too, right? Like fawning and people pleasing is us trying to give ourselves a sense of safety by making other people around us feel okay. And so Meg talks about how these anxious thoughts, this rumination is managing this feeling of discomfort underneath. And that’s something we’re really going to be curious about. Because we know, of course, in our adult brain, it’s not dangerous to feel anxious. But for many of us, the context our brain is generating based on the environments we did grow up in is huge terror, huge rage, huge grief, huge disappointment, huge overwhelm. And underneath it all, a deep sense of aloneness in those feelings. So there’s kind of a split experience where an adult part of us might say, well, I know these thoughts aren’t dangerous. I know I can sit with the discomfort of being anxious. But when our brain is literally generating the experience that says, it’s deeply dangerous to feel this way, you will lose everyone if you let yourself feel the anger, the rage, the fear, whatever it is, then that’s why we have to start with getting to that deeper learning rather than trying to manage the thoughts and convince ourselves that it’s okay to feel discomfort. That step has to come after we meet and work with that deeper learning, that deeper experience. And I know we might want to jump to that step because we’re ready to be free of the anxious thoughts. We said, let’s just feel the discomfort and get through it. But that’s counteractive, right? That’s trying to convince our brain with all our might that it’s not unsafe to feel our feelings. But when we had a lot of experiences in our early lives that taught us feeling our feelings, making mistakes, being ourselves, will make everyone around us mad, will make us in a way, will make the environment feel more unsafe. Then we have to work with that deeper learning first of what our brain predicts would happen. Like what would happen if I could never be anxious again? If you woke up tomorrow and your brain could never, ever, ever feel anxious again, never think about making others happy, never think about making mistakes, just you being yourself and following your instinct and what you want for yourself, what would happen? And a part of your brain might say, oh, that would feel really good. I really want that. But when we really slow down and let it sink through the layers, that’s often when the deeper experience comes in that says, no, that wouldn’t be safe. I would miss something. I would make a mistake. I would miss the tiger jumping out and it would eat me, metaphorically, right? So we’re really curious about how that anxiety and those anxious thoughts feel like they’re load-bearing. And we want to figure out what that load is it’s bearing, what it’s protecting us from, what it protected us from in the past. And so what Meg calls conditioned beliefs in this chapter, we’re going to continue to refer to as emotional learnings, parts, and schemas, because we know they’re not just beliefs, they’re actually learnings. I mean, we acquired them through experiences, right? We acquired them. We had over and over again, repeated experiences where we learned when people are in a bad mood, it’s my fault. No one will like me if I’m myself. So that gets deeply embedded in your brain, through your memories and your emotions, as a learning, as a prediction. And those predictions entirely shape the way we see the world. So again, as Meg talks about, we kind of view these parts of us, like if you remember when we read No Bad Parts, that we can have many parts of us that serve these protective functions, trying to keep us safe based on the past, trying to keep us in connection based on the past. And they’re like lenses, glasses through which we see the present. So those predictions from those learnings are always shaping the way we feel, the way we think, and the way we behave. So sometimes it’s helpful for us to envision those parts as younger, our younger selves, and other times it’s not. No matter how you like to visualize it, you can think about these anxious parts of you, these critical parts of you, these perfectionist parts of you, as bundles of neural pathways in your brain that are trying to keep you safe based on the past. But you’re the one who can see them, and you’re the one who can see what’s actually happening in the present. And little bits at a time, you can help your brain learn from the present and not stay stuck in these old learnings from the past. We know that inner critic is a really big part of early attachment failures, early developmental ruptures, because it’s all about, inner critic is all about shame, and shame is all about keeping a lid on the pot of bigger emotions that didn’t feel safe. There’s an example in here of someone who, every time she shares her work, she just makes fun of herself and said, oh stupid, it’s just a little side thing I do. And then that underlying learning might be that I need to deflect so people know I’m humbled and good, and then no one will feel threatened by me because I’m just a nobody, right? So again, there’s that sense of safety, no one will feel threatened by me. But we know that the learning of as long as I am a nobody, as long as I’m humble, I can’t be hurt because no one will feel threatened by me, that that is the learning, right? So it’s not just about not being good enough, it’s about how that learning was protective, how that kept you safe. Because if you didn’t believe that, if you believed that you were actually worthy, then you might have felt threatened. You might have felt like, oh I am worthy and my family can’t see that, so now I’m furious. But it doesn’t feel safe for us as children to feel furious at our parents. We might feel, oh I am good enough, but my parents just can’t recognize that because they’re so wrapped up in everything that’s happening for them. And that feels so deeply sad and hurtful, that that feels too overwhelming to feel. It might feel terrifying to think, I can’t be myself and be good enough, because every time I try to express myself, I get sent away, or everyone gets tense, or another fight erupts, and that feels really scary, right? So holding on to this idea that like, if I believe I’m good enough, then I will threaten my family, and they will collapse, they will leave me, they will hurt, whatever it is. It gives us then a sense of safety and a sense of control to tell ourselves that we’re not good enough, to make fun of ourselves. It puts the lid on the pot and allows us to control all those swirling emotions of anger, grief, disappointment, loneliness, that feels like too much, right? That is what happened in the past, but now we’re observing what might be true in the present versus what you learned when you were younger. And all of this comes from observing. Remember, we won’t be able to observe live in the moment, right? We won’t always be able to feel like, oh, I’m feeling anxious right now, and it’s because when I was a kid, it was really hard for my family, when I had emotions, or when I had needs. We won’t be able to do that in the present because our brain is generating all that context, and we’re feeling overwhelmed. So we can do this retroactively, right? We can look back at any time. It doesn’t matter if it’s minutes, hours, days, or weeks after a stressful experience happened and you’ve been criticizing yourself. You can pause at any time and watch the tape back and observe and be curious. What was happening? What was my brain predicting was going to happen? What was happening in the present? Because fair enough, there’s always things happening in the present. There can be stressors and hard things happening in the present. But what is coming from the past and landing onto the present and getting projected into the future? That gives us the information about these deeper learnings or parts that we need to meet, observe, get curious about, and then give ourselves a new experience to help update our brain. So in that same example, we might come to the end of the day, and maybe we were, I don’t know, you know, spending time with a new friend, and we were thinking, oh, I’m not feeling very good. And we’re looking back and we’re saying, oh, yeah, you know, my new friend was really cheering me on about my graphic design business, and I felt like I had to just keep deflecting and saying, oh, it’s stupid. It’s just a little side thing I do. You know, I needed to make sure she knew I was a nobody, that I’m not good enough. And that feels really bad. And as I observe that right now, I can just remember how important it was for me to not make anyone in my family feel threatened, to not make them feel like I was better than them. And as I notice that right now, I just think, oh, my gosh, that must have been so hard for me. Yeah, well, no wonder I feel this way. Right? So do you see how observation allows us that wildlife documentarian capacity to observe and say, that makes sense? We don’t have to jump to self-compassion. We don’t have to say, oh, I love that part of me, although we can. But instead, just by observing and getting curious about that deeper learning, we shift our brain back into the present instead of being stuck in the past. And that actually gives us a new experience, too, of what is it like for someone to validate our experience, tell us that it makes sense, be curious about our inner world. So that inner attachment is a very important piece of this, too. It’s also very common when we grew up in environments like this to really feel a lot of fear about our thoughts. We’ll feel shame about being critical of others. We’ll feel afraid that by thinking something, we’re going to make it happen. And that makes a lot of sense. That’s the experience of a child, right? When we’re children, we really feel like things are magical, like our thoughts have power. But we know instead, thoughts are just thoughts. When we can observe them and be curious about them, that’s really what slows things down. Right? So when you were stuck in overthinking, ruminating, intellectualization, it can feel like you’re bad for having these thoughts that are making something bad happen by worrying about it. Right? But instead, we’re just observing, like, oh my gosh, this part of you that is just so scared. Instead of trying to shut them up, right, and resist them and say, nothing’s going to happen when I get on the plane. You know, stop causing difficulty for me. I know flying is safe. But we try to resist those thoughts, because they’re scary, and they’re overwhelming. And they might feel like they’re getting in our way. Instead, we can just notice them and be curious. Like, yeah, some part of me is really scared about this experience of getting on this plane. I don’t know why. Maybe I do know why, but I don’t really know what the deeper learning is. But I don’t have to try to resist this thought. I can just notice it and be curious about it and observe it. And over time, get more and more clarity about what’s really underneath that thought. Eventually, as we do so, we might step into even soothing or meeting those parts of us. Saying, I know you’re scared right now. It’s okay, and I’m here. You’re safe now. I’m here, and I’ll take care of you. I see you’re overthinking again. That’s okay. Thank you for trying to protect me. You’re allowed to be here, and I’m not trying to get rid of you, but you don’t need to work so hard. Sometimes we’re able to say those things, and they feel really soothing to us. But other times, they’re counteracting that deep survival learning that says, I can’t stop overthinking. Overthinking is the only way I can stay safe. So we really can use these statements more as curiosities. If I’m stuck in ruminating and hypervigilance, and I say, I see you’re overthinking again. That’s okay. Thank you for trying to protect me. What happens? Do things slow down? Do I feel a little relieved by that? Or does it feel like I’m really still secretly trying to get rid of that part of me and say, yes, yes, things are okay. Thank you for trying to protect me. Move along. That’s the difference between embodied compassion and intellectualized compassion. And it takes time to practice observing, to get clear about when being kind to yourself or meeting yourself is actually thinking through the layers versus when it’s just you trying to manage yourself in another way, right? Intellectualized self-compassion. But we really want to use everything as an experiment to be curious. What happens when I say this? What happens when I try this on? What happens when I do this? Because that observing is going to give us more and more data about those deep core learnings from our life. So as we’re practicing this observing, that maybe we’re thinking about it like this mindful experience where we’re noticing. And we might have this expectation that we will feel calm, that we shouldn’t have anxious thoughts if we’re observing, if we’re being mindful. But really, we know we’re going to have the full depth and breadth of the human experience, which means there will be many emotions and many thoughts. And instead, we’re just noticing them. Right? Meg suggests labeling, you know, saying, that’s just what’s happening. I’m overthinking. (22:49 - 27:01) Oh, I have this anxious thought right now. Oh, I’m criticizing myself right now. And I think that’s a really good curious practice. That’s why I always talk about the wildlife documentarian. We’re taking notes. We’re just noticing. We’re really gathering data about our experience because we don’t really know ourselves. We might know our learnings. We might know all of our survival strategies. But we don’t really know what’s happening underneath. We want to gather more data to learn not just what we can see, but what else might be happening, what else might be true. And so Meg uses this acronym NICER. Notice, invite, curiosity, embrace, and return. Right? So notice is that observing what’s happening internally. Invite the experience to be here, allowing it to exist, saying this is okay, even if there’s discomfort. Thanks for reading tiny sparks - trisha wolfe! This post is public so feel free to share it. Bringing in some curiosity. What part of me has been activated? What is it that I’m feeling? Can I label or notice what the experience is in my body, in my emotions, in my thoughts? Embrace this part of me. Wrap it in a protective blanket and say, I see you. Thank you for trying to help me. And then return to what’s real and true right now. The sensations of the breath, the sounds of the room, the feeling of the feet on the ground. Right? So this really interesting mindful practice to help come back to the present. So let’s use that NICER acronym over these next few weeks as an experiment rather than as a mandate, rather than as something you must do and then you must feel better after you do it. Let’s use it as an experiment. When something comes up, you criticize yourself, you feel anxious, you notice you were fawning, you notice you were overthinking, whatever it is. What happens when you notice it just as soon as you can, even if it’s the next day, the next week? What happens when you observe it? What is it like? Do you start to criticize yourself more? Can you notice that? Can you remember how that’s a lid on the pot, that there must be some bigger feeling that isn’t feeling safe to feel? This invitation of allowing it to exist without immediately trying to fix it or change it. What’s it like to consider that? Does that make you feel more anxious? Do you start to feel numb? Does it feel unsafe? Does it feel like maybe you’re not ready to invite it to be there yet, but maybe you can shift to curiosity? What’s happening in that moment? What is my brain predicting when I notice that? Does it make sense that I don’t want to invite this in because it feels like it will take me deeper down into terror? Does embracing this part even feel possible? Do I even feel separate from this part? Or does it feel like, no, this is just me, this is the truth? We don’t have to embrace the part. We can just be curious about noticing. Embracing the part can become counteractive if we do it before we’re ready, because it’s us trying to tell ourselves something is okay when something might not be okay, right? It might not feel okay to accept ourselves for who we are, if that means that we will settle down, we won’t be overthinking, we’ll be present. That can feel really dangerous to a part of our brain. So we don’t have to jump to embracing, we can use it as a curiosity. When I imagine embracing this part of me, thanking this part of me, letting that part of me know it’s safe, what happens? And then when I try to return to what’s present, what happens then? Does it feel safe? Does it feel scarier to try to bring myself back in the present? As this book and with everything, we just use these things as a curiosity, an experiment, to learn more about ourselves and to see what happens. When we can do so without creating pressure that, oh, I have to practice this nicer thing so that I can come back down into the present and stop overthinking and feel a little bit safer, you see, then that’s just going to create another thing that we have to be good at. But when we can use it as an observational experiment, it’s really us being curious about ourselves, which for many of us is a new experience that we didn’t get that helps update those learnings in the brain and then can help lead to more action, more safety, more presence, more agency, more choice and flexibility over time. So thank you so much for being here. I think this is a really rich chapter. (27:02 - 27:24) I would love to hear how you try on observation in your life. Have you tried mindfulness before and felt that it was just another way for you to pressure yourself? What’s the difference for you in your mind between observing and being curious and having to be mindful? Let me know what you’re noticing. Let me know what you’re thinking. I hope you have a great rest of your week or weekend ahead and I’ll look forward to seeing you for chapter five. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit trishawolfe.substack.com/subscribe

  • July 11 · 14 min

    Grief, anger, and emotional loneliness

    This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit trishawolfe.substack.com (0:00 - 3:50) Hi and welcome back to our book club where we are diving into the book Are You Mad At Me?, all about fawning and our survival strategies from childhood. This week we’re going to be reading a chapter that addresses grief, anger, and emotional loneliness. These are feelings that will be very familiar to those of us who grew up in environments with developmental ruptures and attachment failures. Maybe we had emotionally immature caregivers or other forms of early developmental trauma. If you’re familiar with my work, you’ve likely heard me talk about the big three of the emotions, and that is anger, sadness, and fear. These are normal expected emotions that all humans will feel, and there are many emotions that kind of branch off from there. Of course, hurt and grief and rage and annoyance, frustration, disappointment. There are many ways we might experience emotions within that spectrum, but those emotions are also very present when we have experienced these attachment ruptures in our lives. And there’s a difference between feeling those feelings in the present and feeling those feelings as a child and being all alone in them. And so this chapter is going to be curious about how we as adults can start to feel things like grief, like anger, to identify our feelings of loneliness that can often create feelings of being very afraid because it’s terrifying for a child to feel that they are disconnected, and how those things impacted us as a child versus how we can be with them as an adult. You know by now if you listen to some of the other books, like Unlocking the Emotional Brain, that many of our parts, our schemas, our patterns, what we might think of as core beliefs, are actually emotional learnings. So many of these things that say, if I want other people to love me, that I need to be good, that I need to be meeting all their needs all the time, I can’t be myself. These are unconscious learnings stored in our brain, and they are rife with emotion. So when we are a child and we have this experience of when I’m my playful, silly, messy, emotional self, it upsets my parents, or they seem to fall away from me, or they seem more stressed, or they fight more. We might feel in that moment very scared because we rely on our caregivers to keep us safe.

  • June 25 · 14 min

    The performer, the perfectionist, and the caretaker

    This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit trishawolfe.substack.com (0:00 - 8:47) Hi and welcome back to our read-along of Are You Mad At Me? In this chapter, we’re going to be exploring a little bit about this idea of being good and looking at a couple of case studies of how this might develop in different homes. And while we’re exploring this, maybe we’re just going to hold the curiosity of each of the learnings that these individuals may have experienced in their lives that led to learning that they needed to fawn, to people please, to not have needs, in order to maintain their attachment relationship. We know that all of our survival strategies, our parts, our adaptations, however you like to think about them, are not beliefs. They don’t come from beliefs. They come from learnings, meaning they come from acquired experiences in our lives. We develop these things in response to our environment because we are so adaptive as humans.

  • June 12 · 10 min

    The other f-word - what the fawn response is and how it has protected you?

    This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit trishawolfe.substack.com Hi and welcome back to our book club. I’m so excited to be reading this summer, Are You Mad At Me?, a deep dive into how to stop focusing on what others think and start living for you. I’m excited to have a little bit of a different book this time.

  • May 16 · 29 min

    somatic experiencing and the predictive brain: rethinking the body keeps the score

    In this episode of our Unlocking the Emotional Brain book club, we explore the final case study in the book, a Somatic Experiencing demo led by Peter Levine with a client named Bonnie. The episode looks at how somatic experiencing, a bottom-up modality developed by Peter Levine and focused on the felt sense and body sensations, uses the very same unifying process of memory reconsolidation as every other modality covered in the book. We talk about why trauma is not literally stored in the tissues of the body but lives instead within the brain's predictive model, why somatic and body-based work is one valid path to healing rather than the only one, and how a disconfirming experience does not always look like an obvious juxtaposition, but can instead be the moment a person becomes aware of a prediction their brain has been making all along. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit trishawolfe.substack.com/subscribe

  • April 17 · 10 min

    Psychedelic assisted therapy and memory reconsolidation

    This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit trishawolfe.substack.com Hello and welcome back to our book club read-along of Unlocking the Emotional Brain. If you’re new here, I release a new podcast episode every two weeks where we slowly and thoughtfully explore this book together. You can also listen on Spotify & Apple Music. These episodes are meant to help translate dense theory into everyday language and to connect the science to real life, real patterns, and real change. We also gather twice during each book for live meetings where you can connect with others, share reflections, and ask questions in real time - our next live meeting is Saturday, April 25th at 11 am EDT. If you’d like to learn more about getting unstuck and making lasting change in your life, join my upcoming class: 5 Steps to Change this Sunday (recording will be available if you can’t attend live!). This book takes us deep into the science of memory reconsolidation, one of the most important mechanisms for understanding how lasting change actually happens. It helps explain why insight alone is rarely enough, and how healing can occur after trauma, attachment wounds, or growing up in environments where our emotional needs were not consistently met. If you’ve been wanting to go deeper into this work, becoming a paid subscriber gives you access to the full book club experience. That includes our live sessions, ongoing discussions, and the complete archive of past reads, such as No Bad Parts, Healing Developmental Trauma, and Adult Children of Emotionally Immature Parents. Your support makes this space possible, and I’m genuinely grateful you’re here and reading along with me. Hello and welcome back to our read-along of Unlocking the Emotional Brain. We are making our way through the final chapters of this book where we are looking at different models of psychotherapy like somatic experiencing, internal family systems, and this week we will be looking at psychedelic assisted therapy, specifically looking at a case that is using ayahuasca. I would like to give you a quick note and a warning that the case that we discuss here does mention someone who dies by suicide and I know that can be triggering to us for a variety of reasons and so please know that you do not have to listen to this case to get anything out of the book club. This is just another way of looking at memory reconsolidation. Please take care of yourself and know this will be here in the future if you decide to come back to it, but you don’t have to listen to it right now. And as we are reviewing these we are being curious about that thread that this book hypothesizes leads through all different types of psychotherapy and really all different types of change and that is memory reconsolidation and the therapeutic reconsolidation process that Bruce Ecker lays out for us in this book here.

  • April 3 · 26 min

    You've got the magic in you

    Hello and welcome back to our book club read-along of Unlocking the Emotional Brain. If you’re new here, I release a new podcast episode every two weeks where we slowly and thoughtfully explore this book together. You can also listen on Spotify & Apple Music. These episodes are meant to help translate dense theory into everyday language and to connect the science to real life, real patterns, and real change. We also gather twice during each book for live meetings where you can connect with others, share reflections, and ask questions in real time - our next live meeting is Saturday, April 25th at 11 am EDT. If you’d like to learn more about getting unstuck and making lasting change in your life, join my upcoming class: 5 Steps to Change. This book takes us deep into the science of memory reconsolidation, one of the most important mechanisms for understanding how lasting change actually happens. It helps explain why insight alone is rarely enough, and how healing can occur after trauma, attachment wounds, or growing up in environments where our emotional needs were not consistently met. If you’ve been wanting to go deeper into this work, becoming a paid subscriber gives you access to the full book club experience. That includes our live sessions, ongoing discussions, and the complete archive of past reads, such as No Bad Parts, Healing Developmental Trauma, and Adult Children of Emotionally Immature Parents. Your support makes this space possible, and I’m genuinely grateful you’re here and reading along with me. This week, we’re doing a little recap of what, exactly, memory reconsolidation is, how it creates long-term change, and how we can learn to provide ourselves with new present-day experiences that activate that process. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit trishawolfe.substack.com/subscribe

  • March 20 · 10 min

    The Good Girl's Rage: Memory Reconsolidation and ISTDP

    This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit trishawolfe.substack.com Hello and welcome back to our book club read-along of Unlocking the Emotional Brain. If you’re new here, I release a new podcast episode every two weeks where we slowly and thoughtfully explore this book together. You can also listen on Spotify and Apple Podcasts. These episodes are meant to help translate dense theory into everyday language and to connect the science to real life, real patterns, and real change. We also gather twice during each book for live meetings where you can connect with others, share reflections, and ask questions in real time - our next live meeting is April 25, 2026, at 11 am EDT! This book takes us deep into the science of memory reconsolidation, one of the most important mechanisms for understanding how lasting change actually happens. It helps explain why insight alone is rarely enough, and how healing can occur after trauma, attachment wounds, or growing up in environments where our emotional needs were not consistently met. If you’ve been wanting to go deeper into this work, becoming a paid subscriber gives you access to the full book club experience. That includes our live sessions, ongoing discussions, and the complete archive of past reads, such as No Bad Parts, Healing Developmental Trauma, and Adult Children of Emotionally Immature Parents. Your support makes this space possible, and I’m genuinely grateful you’re here and reading along with me. This week, we’re continuing with the section of the book that walks through different therapy modalities, examining how each creates transformational change through the same underlying mechanism: memory reconsolidation. Today, we’re focusing on ISTDP, Intensive Short-Term Dynamic Psychotherapy, a framework developed by Habib Davanloo that looks at how our suppressed emotional experiences drive symptoms, sometimes psychological, sometimes physiological, and sometimes both at once. What I love about going through these cases together is that it keeps reinforcing that it doesn’t matter which modality a therapist uses. What matters is whether they are working with the neurobiological mechanisms of change. And those mechanisms, again and again, look remarkably similar underneath the surface, no matter the type of therapy. These mechanisms are things we can also access in our own lives by practicing observing and being curious about our experience - how cool is that!

  • March 6 · 22 min

    The Patterns We Inherit: Interpersonal Neurobiology and the Rules We Learned in Relationships

    Hello and welcome back to our book club read-along of Unlocking the Emotional Brain. If you’re new here, I release a new podcast episode every two weeks where we slowly and thoughtfully explore this book together. You can also listen on Spotify. These episodes are meant to help translate dense theory into everyday language and to connect the science to real life, real patterns, and real change. We also gather twice during each book for live meetings where you can connect with others, share reflections, and ask questions in real time. This book takes us deep into the science of memory reconsolidation, one of the most important mechanisms for understanding how lasting change actually happens. It helps explain why insight alone is rarely enough, and how healing can occur after trauma, attachment wounds, or growing up in environments where our emotional needs were not consistently met. If you’ve been wanting to go deeper into this work, becoming a paid subscriber gives you access to the full book club experience. That includes our live sessions, ongoing discussions, and the complete archive of past reads like No Bad Parts, Healing Developmental Trauma, and Adult Children of Emotionally Immature Parents. Your support makes this space possible, and I’m genuinely grateful you’re here and reading along with me. This week, we’re continuing into the section of the book that walks through different therapy modalities, looking at how each one creates transformational change through the same underlying mechanism: memory reconsolidation. Today, we’re focusing on interpersonal neurobiology, a framework developed by Dan Siegel in the 1990s that looks at how our early attachment experiences shape these mental models, these big books of rules about how the world works, how relationships work, and how safe we are allowed to feel inside of them. What I love about going through these cases together is that it keeps reinforcing something I think is so important: it doesn’t matter which modality a therapist uses. What matters is whether they are working with the right mechanisms. And those mechanisms, again and again, look remarkably similar underneath the surface. In this episode, we’re going to look at how interpersonal neurobiology activates the reconsolidation process, and we’re going to follow a case that shows something I find genuinely fascinating: how the patterns we carry aren’t always just ours. Sometimes we are holding something that traveled through the people before us. (0:00 - 4:07) Hi and welcome back to our book club read-along of Unlocking the Emotional Brain. We are doing a deep dive into this book that tells us all about memory reconsolidation, transformational change, and the therapeutic reconsolidation process. And what all of that means is we are looking at what the mechanisms of change are within therapy. What is it that allows us to actually create long-lasting change versus feeling like we always have to manage, to be managing our habits, to be managing our behaviors, to be reframing our thoughts. There’s a time and a place for those activities. But this book guides us into deeper understanding of how we can actually create transformational change and work with the root cause of our thoughts, emotions, body sensations, behaviors, and patterns in the present, rather than having to try to whack-a-mole down the symptoms that stem from them. So it’s a really exciting book. It puts together a lot of research into this process. And we are now in the part of the book where we are diving into different modalities, different types of therapy, and looking at how memory reconsolidation plays a role in their process of creating transformational change. This week we’re going to be talking about interpersonal neurobiology. This is a type of psychotherapy that was created by Dan Siegel in the 1990s, and it too has an exploration into emotional implicit schemas that have been formed in response to patterns of distressing interaction that we might experience in our infancy and in our childhood. So Dan Siegel has done a lot of wonderful work in this field, and let’s look at a little bit of how interpersonal neurobiology uses memory reconsolidation to create long-lasting change. And before we dive in, if you are new here and you’re not familiar with some of these terms like memory reconsolidation or transformational change, you can go back and listen to the full archive where we have gone through each of these terms and talked about what that means from a mind-body component. So you can see a theme in a lot of these modalities that we’ve discussed so far, that there is this idea of schemas, patterns, parts, survival strategies, and interpersonal neurobiology holds that same idea that these mental models form by an individual and are part of what create our symptoms or our patterns in the present. Think of these mental models like a big book of the rules of engagement. It’s all of the ways that you learned to interact with the world, positive, negative, and neutral. Not all implicit learnings or rules of engagement are negative. Some of them are pro-social, meaning they are about how we behave in the world to be kind to others, to be in community, to be in connection. Others are about ourselves, our self-concept, how we see ourselves in the world and relating to others, and they can be pieces of our identity. And others are around trying to stay safe and in connection and prevent damage. And those are the ones that can generate symptoms in the present that come from this early, ongoing, insecure attachment in relationship. And sometimes we can think about that as harm that we experienced in our early lives. And for some of us, it was very clear that there was harm. And for others of us, it’s less clear. There wasn’t necessarily a direct harm experience, but perhaps like that earlier book we read, we had emotionally immature parents. Perhaps our parents were under a lot of stress themselves. So we got that slot machine parent where we never knew whether we were going to get love and connection or withdrawn or snapped at and sent away. (4:08 - 9:52) All of those insecure moments in an attachment relationship can create these thought, emotion, body sensation patterns of us trying to figure out how to stay safe in this confusing world. So interpersonal neurobiology holds that same idea. They also, much like AEDP and some of these other modalities, hold the idea that the therapeutic relationship, the experience between the therapist and client, can create that reparative attachment experience that can help upgrade our brain functioning in the present. So as we saw earlier in the AEDP model, the experience of being reflected to from the therapist or having the therapist be this safe, curious person when these patterns or emotions arise in itself is a disconfirming experience. And remember that disconfirming experience is where something different happens from what our brain is expecting to happen. In the predictive brain model, we call that a prediction error. So if your brain is predicting that, for example, someone’s going to hurt you or send you away when you feel your emotions, and then you get to be present with this therapist that not only doesn’t send you away, but is so curious about them with you, that reflects them with you, that rides the wave with you, that is an experience where your brain predicted you would be hurt or sent away, but instead you get someone who stays in it with you. So a lot of therapeutic modalities hold the idea that that therapeutic relationship is in itself a disconfirming experience, which is part of the memory reconsolidation process. So then interversal neurobiology relies on the client’s felt-sense experience of the therapist’s empathetic emotional attunement, the guidance from the therapist for attending to, noticing, and naming these quote-unquote right brain activities where those implicit learnings are held or unconscious learnings are held, guidance for how to identify the way current triggers might resemble past experiences, and then cultivating all of that into an integrated awareness of what was suffered in the past, the idea being that that will end the projection of the past onto the present. So again, we see very similar experiences between some of the models we’ve talked about so far, internal family systems, AEDP, EMDR, somatic experiencing, and this is why I always want to emphasize, and I love that this book goes through all of these modalities, it doesn’t matter what modality you choose, as long as they are focusing on these mechanisms of change, and as long as you feel connected to the model and the therapist, then you have everything you need to make a change, because they all kind of hold these same unifying concepts of the therapeutic relationship and the therapeutic reconsolidation process using memory reconsolidation, and interpersonal neurobiology is the same. Now this case is slightly different from some of the other cases we’ve seen, just because of the way that interpersonal neurobiology publishes and shares their information. This is a recounting of a therapist named Bonnie about their case, so it’s not quite as in-depth as some of the other cases we’ve seen. However, I think it’s important to go through nonetheless to look at how interpersonal neurobiology might help us understand how we can activate this reconsolidation process. So in this case, the client’s name is Cerise, and Cerise came to therapy because all of her close relationships ended in her pulling away whenever the emotional intimacy became intense. So remember, this is step A of the process, symptom identification. And I just want to make a little note about that off the start, that some modalities start with the symptom identification, others start with desire identification. So instead of what they want to move away from, they look at what they want to move toward. And I think interestingly enough, moving toward the desire is always the way that I have worked and found myself working in my own life and with my clients, because very often people will come in thinking that they have a very clear idea of what their symptoms are. And again, we know symptom identification is step A in this process, but that doesn’t mean they know what they want. That doesn’t mean they know where they want to go. And because we know so much of the process of trauma, of having emotionally immature parents, of existing in the world in these difficult states, is that we get very disconnected from knowing what we want because of those lenses from our implicit learnings that color and change the way we view the world. And so very often if I do ask people what they want, they might say something self-critical, or it might be around wanting other people to change their behavior, which of course makes sense. But it’s fairly typical that they might not have a sense of what they actually want for themselves. Because we are often disconnected from choice and flexibility and having needs, let alone having wants and desires, it can be really interesting to start with desire, what we want to move toward or wants, rather than what we don’t want to move toward. Both are acceptable and valid, but since you’re listening to this not only for, you know, there might be some therapists who want to help their clients, but for yourself, it’s something you can be curious about too as you’re identifying all of your symptoms in step A of this process. You can be curious about what you might want for yourself that might reveal even more deeply held implicit learnings. You might not even be able to identify what you want for yourself. (9:52 - 10:11) That in itself becomes the curiosity. What learnings do I have around wanting something, desiring something? So that’s a little side note from me, but models start differently, and I just want to notice that as we’re going together. And you are trying to apply this in your life to understand, starting with the symptoms makes sense, it’s part of this process. (10:12 - 14:08) We can also be curious about what we’re wanting for ourselves, and very often our brain will then reveal even deeper symptoms there. Okay, so back to the case where they have identified that Ceres often pulls away when emotional intimacy becomes intense. And so in interpersonal neurobiology, they’re working their way through these childhood memories in which she had felt overwhelmed by her mother, but they didn’t really notice any change from working through these memories. And so they tried to go deeper and deeper into this source of her fear, and she felt this backing away when she saw an image of her parents in their avoidance, so her parents avoiding each other. And so in memory reconsolidation process, the next step is looking at the underlying emotional learning. This is step B, right? So in this case, this self-protective distancing from her parents’ difficult relationship was looking alongside of, oh, that’s her pattern, right? She observed that in her parents, and then her pattern is distancing herself from her own potential relationship. So there’s something about a learning here, about an expectation that being in any relationship, any romantic relationship, will have some entrapment into the misery that she saw her parents experience, right? So we know we’re always looking for the deeper learning. What are the rules we learned in our lives? And here we can see it wasn’t just about this avoidance that she experienced from her mother, but her parents’ relationship was so difficult, and she would have felt all the difficulty and pain in that as a child, and so her brain developed a learning that said, if I get myself into a romantic relationship, I too will be stuck in this suffering. So isn’t that interesting, right? We’re always looking for what does the brain think will happen? So if I let myself get close to someone, what does the brain think will happen? Do I even want to have a close relationship? That’s why I like looking at a desire approach. So if you’re pulling away from emotional intimacy, do you want it? Do you want to be in a relationship? Is that what you’re really wanting for yourself? Because that would be revealing too. If that’s not what you really even want, why? And that’s where we might get to that learning too about any relationship being a trap. So I just want you to see that you can start in multiple directions and still come into that curiosity of what does my brain think will happen with this symptom? What is it protecting me from? What is this strategy? What is the lesser of the two sufferings? Remember, coherence therapy holds the two sufferings idea. So there’s some suffering that is better to choose, in this case, better to kind of rupturing my own relationships when I get close to emotional intimacy, than letting myself get into this deep relationship and being trapped in misery. And we can see that laid out here. So as this case progresses, they’re looking to work with the quote unquote child states of mind and looking at these inner parents and talking about what was hurting or scaring them. So many types of therapy use this idea of a child state. In internal family systems, we have the idea of parts, we have exile parts, manager parts, firefighter parts, all of which could represent these child experiences. In NARM, which is not discussed in this book, but we read the NARM book, if you want to go back and listen to that, they often refer to it as the child consciousness. I want to emphasize here, implicit learnings can be acquired at any point in our lives, not just our childhood. But because there’s so much rapid development and attachment happening within our childhood, that’s very often why we look back there to see what we might have learned. We’re starting from scratch when we’re born, right? So we’re acquiring a lot of learning very quickly, which is why there’s often this focus on our experience when we were children, and what rules and learnings we may have acquired then. (14:08 - 14:40) But of course, you can also gather learnings in your adult life too. When we’re talking about the consciousness or the child mind, what we’re really talking about is getting to that implicit knowledge, in this case, relating to her parents, looking at what she might have learned from this experience. And so in this interpersonal neurobiology case, the therapist is eliciting her knowledge and using the parent, each of the parents, as a representative of this process. (14:40 - 15:16) So we’re connecting with this emotional learning that we didn’t know was there because it’s unconscious, right? So in this sense, they are connecting first with her father. So they’re looking at what has she internalized? What did she learn after observing with her father? And in this case, Cerise started to notice her body feeling that behavioral impulse to pull away when she felt a romantic partner coming in, wanting more connection. So this seems to imply that she learned that self-protective response of distancing from her father’s example. (15:16 - 15:40) Okay, so that continues our information in step B of the process of memory reconsolidation, looking for those underlying emotional learnings. So they stay with this moment in the case, and they let her father know that they would stay with him. And she could feel this frightening loss of connection that her father had felt in the connection with her, with his depressed mother. (15:41 - 21:42) Okay, so for her father’s experience, it wasn’t just about his relationship with her mother, but there was an experience he had with his own mother in which she was depressed and pull away from him. So her implicit knowledge, she learned from her father, who learned it from his mother’s emotional disconnection. So he learned to use that emotional disconnection to protect himself from the feeling of abandonment. You can really see in this case how the patterns pass through generations. And this is the underlying quote-unquote schema, right? The pattern driving her relationship. So this ties up step B. We now know that there’s an expectation of emotional abandonment, and that is what needs to be unlearned. So in this state, if you’re familiar with IFS The Parts work, which we talked about last time, the part in this case they are referring to as her father, you know, and that makes sense in this context where they really prioritize the early attachment figures, but this could just as easily be a part of us, right? We take on what we have observed and experienced, and we create our own internal parts. In this model, what they’re offering to this father part is this understanding, this comfort, this connection, things that had been missing for him throughout his childhood. And so that’s an ego state of her, as the authors call it. Think of it as a part, a child consciousness, a survival strategy that she picked up and internalized from her father. And they are now offering to that part of her connection from herself, from her adult consciousness. She is offering to herself what she didn’t receive, which is that connection, that secure attachment from her quote-unquote adult ego state, right? The self with a capital S. And that is providing the disconfirming experience in this case. So remember, in the therapeutic reconsolidation process, we find the symptoms, we find the emotional learning, we reactivate the experience, which they’re doing by going into this part. We provide the contradictory experience, which in this case is the secure attachment from the adult self and also from the therapist. And when we go into step three, it’s that we can hold both of those states at once. And when we do that, the brain then reconsolidates the learning, meaning it updates the learning and says, oh, what happened in the past isn’t the same as what happened now. And she could feel this emotional release in the of that feeling of wanting to pull back. And so that disappearance of the somatic feeling that she was feeling, this desire to pull back, is the marker of transformational change. It’s what lets us know that the learning has been updated. As the case goes on, they then work with her mother part, so the internal experience from her mother’s state. And this one doesn’t come quite as easily. And I’m really glad that they both named this. It sometimes takes layers and layers and layers of work because the implicit learnings are tangled together to protect us, and because they all stack on top of each other through our lives. I always think of it like an archaeological dig. We’re going through layers, and based on the era in which the layer developed, there will be different findings, different thoughts, emotions, body sensations, and behaviors associated there. And so in this case, they were talking about how as they worked with her mother part, they noticed the inner father watching the process and being curious. So that fearful response of withdrawing is no longer there. And as they worked with the emotional layers from the mother, the internal mother, there was able to be this internal connected relationship. That dance of avoidance was over. And so after this happened, then her encounters with her parents and other memories, the clients, Cerise, they were softened. They were turned down. The big emotional charge was not still there. So that is what this case looks like, and how we know transformational change has occurred is the symptoms are turned down. The somatic symptoms, the cognitive symptoms, the emotional symptoms. Then she doesn’t have that same behavioral impulse to need to back away. And that is the final step, V, in this process, the behavioral and emotional freedom. I just want to review again that this idea of the parent part, the adult part, and the child part are in many, many models of therapy. For example, transactional analysis is another one that includes those kind of ego states as parts. You can figure out what works best for you. If you like thinking about it as your internal parent, if you like thinking about it from an IFS model with managers and firefighters, if you like thinking about the adult consciousness versus the child consciousness, it’s all about what works for you. I personally like to think about that idea that all of these schemas are really representations of what? Bundles of thoughts, emotions, body sensations, and behaviors related to the rules of engagement that we learned in our lives. And so each of those parts just represents different learnings like that archaeological dig, different layers of our experience developed at different times in our lives that our brain uses to predict what’s going to happen in the present versus what’s going to happen in the past. I just so enjoy continuing to go through these cases with you because it gives us such a rich opportunity to learn together that there is no one right way to heal. There is just curiosity, observation, connection, excavation, and then building new experiences for ourselves. And very, very often the new experiences that we start with are internal, meaning how we relate to ourselves. (21:42 - 22:05) And that gives us back so much agency, choice, power, and flexibility because we no longer have to rely on other people to give us those new experiences. Let me be clear, it is reasonable and makes sense to want the people around us to be safe and to meet our needs. And as we have agency, choice, and flexibility, those are the relationships we will feel drawn toward. (22:06 - 22:57) But we do not need other people around us to give us the new experience that we’re wanting to be able to complete this memory reconsolidation process. And very often as we learn to meet ourselves in a different way, we will shift the way we show up in relationships in the present. And that very often leads to a change in that relationship as well. So thank you again for being here. What a rich and interesting case this was. Based on your feedback, I think we’re going to go through all the cases. We’re going to go through all the chapters and I’m so excited. I think I continue to learn so much. It’s my fourth or fifth time reading this book from these cases and I think it is the best way to see it applied. It’s not just theoretical, then we really get to see it step by step. So I’d love to hear your thoughts, curiosities, what you learned from this case, and what you’re exploring. Wishing you a good week ahead. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit trishawolfe.substack.com/subscribe

  • February 20 · 14 min

    How does Internal Family Systems Facilitate Healing?

    This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit trishawolfe.substack.com Hello and welcome back to our book club read-along of Unlocking the Emotional Brain. If you’re new here, I release a new podcast episode every two weeks where we slowly and thoughtfully explore this book together. You can also listen on Spotify. These episodes are meant to help translate dense theory into everyday language and to connect the science to real life, real patterns, and real change. We also gather twice during each book for live meetings where you can connect with others, share reflections, and ask questions in real time. If you’d like to learn more about getting unstuck and making lasting change in your life, I have two upcoming classes: 5 Steps to Change and Finding a New Story. This book takes us deep into the science of memory reconsolidation, one of the most important mechanisms for understanding how lasting change actually happens. It helps explain why insight alone is rarely enough, and how healing can occur after trauma, attachment wounds, or growing up in environments where our emotional needs were not consistently met. If you’ve been wanting to go deeper into this work, becoming a paid subscriber gives you access to the full book club experience. That includes our live sessions, ongoing discussions, and the complete archive of past reads like No Bad Parts, Healing Developmental Trauma, and Adult Children of Emotionally Immature Parents. Your support makes this space possible, and I’m genuinely grateful you’re here and reading along with me. This week, we’re continuing into Part Two of the book, where the authors begin walking us through different therapy modalities and showing how they create transformational change through memory reconsolidation. Today, we’re focusing on Internal Family Systems. This section of the book is especially meaningful to me because one of the most common questions I get is how to know what kind of therapy actually helps people change. What matters most is not the name of the modality, but whether the therapy engages the mechanisms of change the brain requires in order to update old emotional learnings. Different therapies can look very different on the surface. They may use different languages, structures, or techniques. But underneath, when real change is happening, they are often doing something very similar. They are helping an old emotional learning become active while something genuinely different is experienced at the same time. That process is what allows the brain to reorganize and let go of patterns that once made sense but are no longer needed. In this episode, we’ll walk through case examples from IFS to see how this process unfolds in real sessions. We’ll look at how observing and being with ourselves in an emotion can help rewire old learnings we may have held for decades. My hope is that by the end, you’ll have a clearer sense of what to listen for, whether you’re choosing a therapist, doing your own inner work, or simply trying to understand why certain approaches finally help when others haven’t. (0:00 - 2:51) Hello and welcome back to our read-along book club where we are reading Unlocking the Emotional Brain. It is the book about memory reconsolidation and coherence therapy and we’re walking through it together where I guide you and translate the information in this book, talk a little bit about what it really means beneath all of the technical terms, and share with you how you might apply this in your life. I think this part of the book is one of the coolest parts of the book because it’s where they take their time and they go through these different models of therapy. This week, we’re going to look at internal family systems and examine how that transformational change of memory reconsolidation takes place using that model. I love this so much because one of the most frequent questions I get is about what type of therapy should I do if I’m an intellectualizer, if I’m a professionist, if I’m self-sabotaging, and of course the answer is at the end of the day there is no one right type of therapy modalities. And even the type of therapies discussed in this book, the therapist may not always be using the steps for transformational change, but it is possible because these modalities have all the things required to make that memory reconsolidation process happen. When we’re talking about these types of therapy, we’re not talking about the organization itself. There’s been a lot of things in the news recently about internal family systems and things that have happened within that organization. Just know when we’re talking about IFS, what we’re really talking about is parts work applied in this specific way. Parts work also comes from schema therapy. Coherence therapy in its own way uses parts work, though it may not refer to it as such. But when we think of parts work, parts are really a story humans have given to bundles of thoughts, emotions, body sensations, and behaviors in our brain. So all of those rules of engagement that we develop over our life, all of those implicit learnings are stored with context. And that context is the thoughts, emotions, body sensations, and behaviors that we experienced when they were happening. The choices we had to make about how to show up in our lives, to stay safe, to stay in connection. All of those things are stored in our predictive brain. And they’re bundled together often in these patterns that go together. So for example, an intellectualizer part may be a part of you, quote unquote, that is a bundle of implicit learnings where you learn to turn down your emotions, disconnect from yourself. Maybe you feel sort of numb or nothingness in your body. You analyze and ruminate and think all of the time. And the behaviors might be that you never slow down, you never fully connect with yourself. (2:51 - 7:23) You’re always going to the next to-do list, the next planner, the next thing. So we might call that a part in certain types of therapies. We might call that a schema in coherence therapy. We might call that a survival strategy in NARM. But all of those things mean the same thing, which they are those rules of engagement of the way that you learn to be in the world. And we can have different experiences of those rules of engagement based on what’s happening in front of us. For example, you might be an intellectualizer, quote unquote, that might be the part of you that you’re most familiar with. Those might be the strategies that you’re using in your everyday life. But you may also have a part that is a people pleaser. So based on the relationship you have the person who is in front of you, you may shift out of that intellectualized state and shift into this part of you that is very hypervigilantly attuned to other people and trying to make things okay for them. Or you may also have a part of you that is very critical alongside of an intellectualizer. Remember, again, these parts are just bundles of thoughts, emotions, and body sensations. So when we’re talking about these therapeutic modalities like internal family systems, we’re not talking about the organization itself because I’m not really qualified to make comments on it because I’m not involved in that organization. But we’re talking about the modality and how parts work might be used to make transformational change. Now one last thing before we dive in, we’re actually getting pretty close to the end of this book. We have a couple more weeks of talking about these different therapeutic modalities. But then there’s a really interesting part three where they go through some of these cases. And so I’d love to hear from you if you would like us to go through some of these cases together. I think it could be really interesting to really dive into some of these cases and look at these unique ways that they’re using coherence therapy. And so as long as that sounds good to you, then we will keep going. But if you would rather curtail part three and not go into the cases and move on to another book, it’s okay to let me know that too. So please feel free to comment, hear a reply, and let me know about going into part three. If we go into part three, it’s if we don’t, it might be closer to the end of March. And then you can also let me know if there’s another book you’d like to see about what comes next. I have some ideas in mind, but I’d love to hear from you. Is there a book about a therapeutic modality or boundaries or having needs or whatever it might be that you’re curious about? You would want to know how we can apply this lens to it of implicit learning, survival strategies, and making change? Let me know and we can start looking toward what comes next. So back into chapter 10, which is talking about internal family systems, and they lay out for us here right off the bat, how much this idea of parts or sub-personalities has been used in the therapeutic world. Of course, this very early idea from Jung, which many of you may have heard of, of the archetypes, right? But this has been a part of many types of therapy, transactional analysis, ego state therapy, gestalt therapy. There’s been parts work and sub-personalities and ego states all throughout the history of psychotherapy. If you were with us when you read No Bad Parts, then you might already be familiar with this, but Internal Family Systems was developed by Dr. Schwartz using that parts language to talk about parts of our experience that carry that emotional memory, referred to as a burden, of these unresolved intense sufferings, of these ruptures that we’ve experienced in our lives. And so they are kept away from our consciousness. And so the parts of us that are kept away in Internal Family Systems are called exiles. And then there are other parts that operate to protect those exiles, to prevent them from being accessed. And we have those two parts called managers. And so managers are kind of like those intellectualism, perfectionism, people-pleasing parts. And then firefighters, which are the emergency response part of us. And so those parts might hold bigger experiences like dissociation, rage, substance use. They’re really trying to suppress any distress that might come up because, again, they’re all protecting those exile parts of us. The exiles are the part of us that hold the deepest, hardest emotional memories of the sufferings we have experienced in our lives. (7:24 - 9:09) In IFS, the therapist is working with the client to access the self, the consciousness, the observer in NARM, the adult consciousness, so that we can unburden the exile. We bring the exile into our direct awareness by observing it, and it can be unburdened by feeling and expressing all of that distress that it has held for so long. And much like the other therapies we’ve explored so far, the client and therapist relationship is a key piece for potentially facilitating this therapeutic process. But the primary experience in IFS is the relationship between the self and the parts. So this is actually an interesting case because the client themselves is a therapist, and they are coming to see this therapist for supervision, because they noticed when they were doing work with a client who was feeling rage, she started feeling a very intense fear within herself that she knows doesn’t make sense in the present context. She knows the client’s not dangerous, she’s not at risk, but she really notices this reaction in her body, specifically in her stomach. So remember, the first step of identifying something to make a change using memory reconsolidation is to figure out the what and the when. And so we can see in this case here, the what and the when is this tension and upset in her stomach that feels like fear when her client starts to get rageful. And so we can see that in internal family systems, much like the modalities of therapy we’ve explored together in this book and in the past, there’s this curious observation. (9:10 - 12:33) There’s not an assuming or an immediate trying to make meaning or manage what’s happening, but there’s this curiosity, this noticing. And so there’s this meeting of this part that feels scared, and it’s felt scared for so long. And so this might indicate in some way that that emotional learning, that anger from other people is dangerous, has been with her for a very long time. And so we’re identifying this in internal family systems as a part, and so we’re letting that part know that we’re the adult now, we’re here now, we are the self. Just the same way as we might identify our adult consciousness in Narm, or our self, our consciousness in any other work, we want to make sure a foot of us stays in the part of us that is observing, even if the rest of us feels very intensely of that other part. And so we’re just asking and we’re being curious, what does this part want us to know? Why is it holding all of this fear? And so in IFS, this is a key piece to look at the distress held by the exile. We want to know why this part is holding on to all of this fear, this exile part, so that we can move toward the therapeutic reconsolidation process of step B, the emotional learning. Remember, the reason why it’s so important to get to that emotional learning is because that emotional learning is what is requiring the symptom. The emotional learning is the thing that says this bad or dangerous or hurtful thing will happen if I let myself, whatever it may be, in this case, if I let myself be comfortable around other people’s anger, something will happen, something dangerous will happen if I’m around other people’s anger. That is the emotional learning that requires the schema, the schema that brings up fear, anxiety, and terror anytime someone else feels anger. This cannot be addressed behaviorally. No amount of telling ourselves, it’s okay if other people are angry, it’s okay if I have a need and it upsets other people is going to address that. Because remember, there’s this idea of two sufferings or in Narm, the core bind. That’s what we’re going to explore here in this case to figure out what is this suffering that she is avoiding when this part of her is choosing to brace and be afraid. We have to figure out what that emotional learning is to see why the schema or the part is bracing so hard against the anger. And that’s key in our own process too. We might think we have a sense of why we do this. We might think we know what the quote unquote core belief is, but without really identifying specifically what that learning or learnings are underneath, we can’t target them with this process. No behavioral change, no thought reframing, no regulating your nervous system will shift that emotional learning without targeting it specifically. So in this case, when she’s asking this part, what’s happening, this part is saying that she learned it’s safer to be silent, not to make demands, not to stand up for herself. So making demands would be standing up for herself and it wouldn’t be safe to do that. (12:33 - 12:50) So we see this emotional learning coming out that standing up for herself is unsafe. And so that feeling is powerlessness. But right now we don’t know the full emotional learning because we don’t know a full description of the suffering she’s trying to avoid. (12:51 - 15:04) So they’re going to continue to be curious about that, right? This young part that’s frightened, a close part that’s saying, don’t make demands, don’t stand up for yourself. And in IFS, that is the manager. The manager is the one saying, don’t make demands, don’t stand up for yourself, because it’s trying to prevent the distress that would come for the exile part. And here’s a really important piece to understand here. In this therapeutic reconsolidation process, there’s an idea that there are two things we learned when something hurtful happens. Number one, this hurts. And number two, here’s what I do about it. And those two learnings get fused together. So in internal family systems, the exile is the hurt part, the part that says this hurts, it’s vulnerable, it’s wounded, it’s feeling all of the pain. And it got tucked away because it was too hard, too much to feel all that pain consciously. The protector part is the other response. What do I do about this? It is the coping part, the behavior, the strategy, the defense, however you’d like to think about it, that developed specifically to prevent that hurt from being felt again. They’re not actually separate problems. They’re two sides of the coin. The protector exists because of the exile. The what do I do about it exists because of the hurt. So we’re really noticing when we’re observing ourselves in this way, we’re looking at is what I’m seeing the hurt itself? Or is it the armor protecting it? Often the thing we might notice first is the armor, the intellectualization, the people pleasing, the perfectionism. But we know that’s not there for fun. It’s not because we enjoy walking around in those strategies. It is protecting us from whatever the hurt is that lies beneath. And so that’s why we get curious about what is the deeper emotion, the deeper learning underneath the strategy. The strategy is armor, the hurt is underneath. So again, things like intellectualization are not the problem, but we often target it as the problem. Intellectualization is the solution.

  • February 6 · 11 min

    How EFT and EMDR Create Lasting Change

    This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit trishawolfe.substack.com Episode Overview In this episode, we continue exploring Part Two of Unlocking the Emotional Brain, examining how memory reconsolidation works within two powerful therapeutic modalities: Emotion-Focused Therapy (EFT) and Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR). Through detailed case studies, we unpack what "changing emotion with emotion" actually means and why bilateral stimulation in EMDR creates lasting change. The Therapeutic Reconsolidation Process Step A: Identify symptoms (what and when) Step B: Uncover implicit emotional learnings (the gut-level beliefs) Step C: Access contradictory knowledge (the juxtaposition that updates the brain) This is the same engine of change across all effective therapies and in self-directed work. Practical Applications Observer Stance Practice slowing down and watching for subtle patterns. Self-criticism, helplessness, and hopelessness often hide in language that sounds very adult and rational. Notice statements like: "I never follow through because I'm an idiot" (sounds factual but reveals an implicit belief) "There's nothing that can be done" (helplessness) "That's just how I am" (resignation) True accountability sounds different: "It's been challenging to follow through, and I'm curious why, because I genuinely want to do these things." The Core Bind Most of us hold both the old learning and the contradictory knowledge simultaneously. This is the bind that keeps us stuck. Therapeutic work (or self-work) is about consciously experiencing both at the same time so the brain can update. Different Paths, Same Mechanism Whether you journal, walk, do somatic work, or attend therapy, the mechanism of change is the same: identifying implicit emotional learnings and creating experiences that contradict them. Find the approach that works for your nervous system and trust level. Important Notes Not all therapies work for all people at all times Complex trauma may make highly emotional approaches (empty chair, intense EMDR) overwhelming The practitioner, your trust in them, and your current capacity all matter These approaches never focus on symptom management (breathing, grounding) during the reconsolidation work itself - they target the underlying templates creating the symptoms

  • January 23 · 11 min

    The Therapeutic Relationship as a Tool for Transformation

    This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit trishawolfe.substack.com Understanding AEDP and Memory Reconsolidation: A Deep Dive into Transformational Therapy Episode Overview This episode explores Accelerated Experiential Dynamic Psychotherapy (AEDP) and how different therapy modalities create transformational change through memory reconsolidation. Using the case study of "Daniel," a 40-year-old divorced father, the discussion illustrates how therapeutic presence and attunement can help clients update deeply held emotional learnings about relationships and safety. Key Concepts Memory Reconsolidation Explained The process allows the brain to unlearn old emotional patterns that no longer serve us Unlike exposure therapy (which builds distress tolerance), memory reconsolidation actually updates the original learning generating the emotion Requires accessing both the belief/cognition AND the feeling that makes it powerful The emotion is how our brain makes meaning out of original experiences AEDP (Accelerated Experiential Dynamic Psychotherapy) Core Principles Focused on transformational change from attachment trauma Emphasizes experiential process - there must be activation and feeling in the present Based on reparative attachment through corrective attachment experiences The therapeutic relationship itself can create memory reconsolidation The Experiential Component Why experiential matters: Needs activation - a feeling in the present of these learnings Not enough to only intellectualize Even just talking and being in relationship with a therapist activates emotions, body sensations, and memories The secure base of the therapeutic relationship is incredibly important for creating change The Therapeutic Reconsolidation Process in AEDP How AEDP Implements the Steps Unique approach: Steps 2, 1, 3, V, and A & B occur intermittently throughout Activation of the disconfirming experience: Therapist constantly asking "How is it for me to say this? How is it for me to be here with you?" Reactivation of symptom schema: Repetitions of "how it was versus how it is now" Observation (Verification): Noticing what is different - how the activation is different, how symptoms are different, increased ease For Therapists The Containment Strategy: Don't follow yourself or your client down into strategies and symptoms Always come back to the present Always notice: "What are you actually noticing? What's actually happening for you in this moment?" For Self-Work When working on your own: "What's it like to let myself name that it's sad right now?" Even without tears or body sensations Slow down from intellectualization This seemingly small step is actually quite significant Memory Reconsolidation vs. Exposure/Habituation Exposure Therapy: Builds distress tolerance Brain learns "I can feel this and survive" Useful but doesn't update original learning Still have to do management strategies Memory Reconsolidation: Updates the original learning generating the emotion Touches a piece of the feeling WHILE simultaneously holding contradictory evidence Brain reorganizes data model Probability of old pattern decreases (99% → 70% → eventually almost nothing) The Split Screen Metaphor Imagine a movie screen split down the middle: Left side: Old experience Right side: New experience Both held simultaneously for brain to reorganize Key Takeaways Disconfirmation experiences don't have to be as big as you think - even tiny moments of noticing difference matter The therapeutic relationship itself is transformational - co-regulation with therapist creates new experiences for the brain Titration is key - little bits at a time, not flooding with emotion Present moment focus - constantly bringing awareness back to "what's happening right now" Spaciousness over pushing - allowing room to notice differences rather than demanding full emotional expression

  • January 9 · 10 min

    Why different therapies work the same way

    This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit trishawolfe.substack.com Chapter 6 pulls back to show us the bigger picture: how all the different therapy approaches - IFS, EMDR, Somatic Experiencing, and more - work through the same underlying process when they create real, lasting change. We explore the decades-long specific factors vs. common factors debate in therapy research, and what it means for your own healing journey. In This Episode: Why different therapy modalities are like different vehicles crossing the same terrain The Therapeutic Reconsolidation Process (TRP) steps - a quick refresher The therapy research debate: Is it the techniques or the relationship that matters? Why feeling safe and understood is essential but often not enough on its own Memory reconsolidation as the mechanism of change - and why the mechanism isn't the whole story What this means for your therapy or self-healing work Key Takeaways: When deep, lasting change happens in therapy, the same underlying process is occurring - regardless of which modality is being used. The therapeutic relationship creates the safety you need to do vulnerable work, but the relationship alone usually isn't enough to produce transformational change. You need both. Memory reconsolidation is the engine of change, but you also need fuel (safety, readiness), a road (observation, curiosity, awareness), and often a driver (therapist or your own developed capacity). What looks like sudden or accidental change is usually the result of lots of prior groundwork, including building a felt sense of safety and capacity to observe ourselves differently through metacognition. It's okay - and even helpful - to understand what your therapy is actually doing. It's your brain and your healing. Connect the Dots: To NARM: The adaptive survival styles in NARM are examples of the implicit emotional learnings we've been discussing. The TRP framework helps explain how those survival styles can be transformed, not just understood. To IFS: When you're working with parts in IFS, the moments of transformation often involve the same juxtaposition experience - an exile holding old pain encounters new evidence (often through Self-energy or an updated understanding) that contradicts the old belief. To Adult Children of Emotionally Immature Parents: The terms of attachment we discussed in Chapter 5 - those unspoken rules about what's allowed in order to stay connected - are exactly the kind of implicit learnings that need to go through this reconsolidation process to truly shift. Questions to Sit With: In my own therapy or self-work, am I getting to the feeling of the old learnings, or mostly talking about them? Have I had experiences in my life that contradict my old beliefs or where something different happened than what my brain predicted? What happened when I did? Where in my life am I doing the observation and curiosity work, even if change hasn’t happened yet in the way I want it to? Coming Up Next: Part 2 of the book walks through case examples from different therapy approaches - showing how the TRP unfolds in Somatic Experiencing, EMDR, IFS, and more. We'll get to see the theory in action!

  • January 5 · 22 min

    Beyond coping: using new experiences to rewire the brain

    (0:00 - 1:23) Hello, my friends, and welcome back to our Substack Book Club. We have a lot of new people here, and so this is going to be a free episode for everyone to listen to, to learn a little bit more about what we do in our book club here. Just to catch you up, we’re currently reading Unlocking the Emotional Brain, which is the seminal book on coherence therapy and memory reconsolidation. Memory reconsolidation is the process by which we can update the old learnings in our brain. So if you found your way here because you consider yourself an intellectualizer, a people pleaser, a perfectionist, you find yourself stuck in traditional therapy because you already understand a lot of things. Maybe you’ve tried nervous system regulation, but you can’t quite seem to get unstuck. It’s likely because you have old unconscious learnings referred to as implicit emotional learnings that are like pathways in your brain. They are things that happened to you in your past that formed roads in your brain that said, this is the safe road to go down. So if every time you had emotions, or you had needs, or you were yourself, you were criticized, or sent away, or punished, or bullied by your peers, or you had parents who, for whatever reason, couldn’t show up for you, then over time, the learning would be, if I have my needs and I am myself, I will be criticized, or I will lose connection. (1:24 - 2:28) And so then that shows up in the present where we mask, we put our true selves away, we stay up in our thoughts, and no amount of insight will change that process. So this book really helps us to understand how we can make long-term change. If you join our book club, you also get access to all of the old episodes where I have gone through Healing Developmental Trauma, a wonderful book covering NARM therapy and helping us understand this process a little bit more, No Bad Parts, a book on internal family systems, another book that can support memory reconsolidation, and Adult Children of Emotionally Immature Parents, which is often very important learning for many of us to understand how our early experiences may have shaped our present-day lives. So thank you so much for being here. Whether you are a free or paid member, you help support my work just by listening, liking, engaging, and commenting, and it’s truly an honor to get to share this information with you. This is going to be a recap episode of what we have explored in Unlocking the Emotional Brain so far, and next week we will dive back in. (2:30 - 3:03) So many of you have read every chapter and taken notes along with me, and some of you may be listening while you do the dishes or go on a walk, and you haven’t cracked the book just once, and that is all completely welcome here. You get to show up in the book club at the level that your system has capacity for, and I love getting to translate these books into everyday understanding to help us actively make change in our lives. So let’s walk through some of these ideas together, and I do want to name again that Unlocking the Emotional Brain is not exactly an easy, cozy read. (3:03 - 6:00) It can be pretty clinical and dense in places, but the reason I chose this book anyway is it’s because something so incredibly important, which is transformational change in therapy, transformational change in mental health, transformational change in how we show up in the world, not just symptom management, not just insight, not just telling you that for the rest of your life you’re going to have to use force and fear and to regulate your nervous system every single day just to be in the world. Now, of course, if you know me, you know that I support nervous system regulation work, and I support insight, and all of those things are wonderful, but they alone do not create transformational change. We have to figure out how to shift these patterns at the root because journals and planning and coping skills do not address the root of why we have these learnings, and this process for transformational change is called memory reconsolidation. We can think of it as if we’re updating the maps, the atlas, the GPS in our brain. Underneath those metaphors is the same basic idea that our brain can revise old emotional learnings from memories of things that happened to us in our lives under certain conditions, and that is the core of what this book is about. Think about your brain as a big excel spreadsheet or a big filing cabinet. In all of the experiences in your life, your brain files away and stores the data, and it puts it into themes like a big zip file. So if you had a series of memories that again told you that when you experience emotions, people will pull away from you, then those get filed into a big folder, and because the potential to lose connection with others is coded as survival, because it is in our brain, because we are wired to have connection, then that learning gets moved to the top as a critically important survival learning. So all of these memories the brain sorts through and said, this has happened a lot, so frequency, so this is something I want to hold on to, and then this has happened and it was really intense, so intensity. So frequency and intensity are what the brain uses to categorize what is an important memory to hold on to versus what isn’t. This all happens unconsciously, so you yourself may not have memories of these specific events, but your brain puts them into a file and then creates a learning. Think about a learning like a rule. The brain is using the data to say, I’m going to predict what’s going to happen in the present and the future based on what’s happened in the past, and I’m going to use that to shape the way that you yourself see the world. It changes the lenses through which we perceive reality to try to keep us safe. Because if the brain is predicting that feeling our feelings and being authentic is going to lead to losing connection, being sent away, being punished, which feels survival oriented, then of course the brain is not going to want to let us be authentic and connect easily. (6:00 - 6:47) So then, for example, we might perceive the people around us as more critical than they are. We might perceive situations as dangerous, like going to meet new people, because if we are ourselves we won’t get to form a new connection, when in actuality they are not dangerous. This all happens below the surface and forms these patterns or parts that we as humans have learned to call intellectualization, people pacing, perfectionism, my anxious part, we have a lot of different names we’ve given to it. But those are all bundles of memories and emotions that create rules. If we in the present want to update those rules, we have to follow this process called memory reconsolidation. And that is one of the key neurobiological mechanisms for change. (6:48 - 16:23) This book walks us through that process. So let’s break down what we’ve covered so far in learning about this process. What we talked about in the very beginning is the difference between symptom reduction and transformational change. So it is possible to reduce our symptoms or to change our experience through behavior change, through force, through willpower, through quote-unquote motivation. So therapy could help you maybe feel 20% less anxious, or feel fewer panic attacks, or go to the gym more often, and that’s absolutely not nothing. Those reductions in symptoms can feel like a really big relief. But oftentimes that reduction happens through management. So we learn how to use strategies to manage our brain and what a gift that we can do that. But I’m guessing if you’re here, you don’t want to have to spend the rest of your life doing symptom management and using force. The reason why that thing that gives you a reduction doesn’t change the pathway in your brain is because it’s still in contradiction with an old learning. So going to the gym every day to take care of yourself through management strategies, habits, and force doesn’t contradict an old learning that says taking care of yourself is selfish. So it requires vigilance at all time to use the strategies to override your brain, which is often why we fail quote-unquote at setting new habits, or we do it for a couple of months and then we stop, or we use management strategies but we still kind of feel stuck, empty, disconnected, or unsure of ourselves. tiny sparks - trisha wolfe is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Transformational change is completely different. In these moments when we can create transformation, we are rewiring the learning that we had. We are rewiring our brain itself so that the brain updates its prediction. It updates its data model. It is so cool that we know now that we can do this. It’s not just about having new experiences. I want to be super clear about that because it’s kind of the in thing right now to talk about how you don’t need regulation, you just need to have new experiences, but they are missing a key part of the process, which is that the new experiences must explicitly target the old learning and they must be incremental, meaning they have to be little bits at a time. But as we do this process, we can update through transformational change these emotional learnings and then we don’t have to use management strategies, force, fear, every single day because the old learnings that say if I’m not perfect I will lose love, if I have needs I’m selfish and I’ll hurt others, if I show feelings people will withdraw, those things can be rewired and the learnings can be updated. So now instead of predicting a 99% chance of something dangerous is happening, the brain realistically says maybe there’s a 5% chance that something could happen if I myself and I have needs. And then what happens is if we have needs and someone criticizes us or doesn’t support our need or whatever it is, we get to experience it through present-day lenses, through our adult eyes, where we can say that still hurt, that didn’t feel good, it doesn’t feel good to be hurt or unseen or criticized or whatever it might be, but it’s not dangerous. And that is the transformational change where we can exist in the present without the past landing onto the present. Another really big part of this book is moving away from seeing symptoms as pathological or self-sabotaging and instead seeing all symptoms as coherent. That is the idea upon which coherence therapy and other types of therapy are based. Every symptom, every strategy, every protective part is coherent because it lines up with an underlying emotional learning. In other words, it makes sense. We spend a lot of time in the future, in the present, sorry, telling ourselves that, well, this symptom doesn’t make sense. I’m not in danger if I have a need. No one’s going to think I’m selfish and if they do, I don’t care. Okay, that’s your rational mind or your intellectualizer mind talking, but that’s not what your emotional learning is. Deep inside, there is a part of you that learned those things do feel dangerous. They do risk connection. They do create suffering. And so we know through this book that there is this idea of two sufferings, that when we have these overwhelming experiences, these intense experiences, these big emotional survival-based experiences, our brain is very quickly categorizing, based on the data it has, what will be the lesser of two sufferings. And so if the suffering is I shut down my own needs, I turn my back on myself, I abandon myself, or the other suffering is I lose connection with people around me, that is actually the far more terrifying suffering. It is far more terrifying, especially as children, to feel that our caregivers would not be okay if we don’t take care of their needs, or our caregivers will withdraw from us if we are our silly, playful selves. That actually creates a feeling of life threat versus the other suffering, which is shutting down our own needs, shutting down our own emotions, going up into our head. We are always choosing between two sufferings. You don’t know you’re doing this. I can’t emphasize enough that this all happens in the unconscious, and it’s not rational. People will try to tell me, well, that doesn’t make sense. That doesn’t matter. These are emotional learnings, and emotions, by their very definition, do not have to be founded in rationality. They are feelings, they are not thoughts. So whatever solutions we came up with in those times of two sufferings, that made sense in the context of the emotional experience and the nervous system experience we had at the time. So if you learned that confident, loud, opinionated adults hurt people, shut other people down, stomped all over them, your brain might come up with a symptom of staying small and doubtful and silent. That symptom might hurt you in the present, it might get in the way of you having the life that you want, but it is the lesser of the two sufferings. If the other option is to turn into the parent or the teacher or whoever it is who terrified you, that is coherent. It’s not random. It’s not a character defect. If every mistake you made as a child was met with shaming, withdrawal, rage, or just disruption and dysfunction in the family system that relied on you to be good, to make them feel okay, then your system will file mistakes as dangerous. So driving yourself to be perfect, never resting, not feeling safe to come down, is fully coherent. It is not something that can be managed solely through behavior because the emotion says that it’s unsafe. We know that these symptoms are adaptive, protective, survival strategies, and they are not the enemy. Instead, we’ve learned through this book to use them as clues to what the emotional learnings are that we want to update. So again, wonderful news that we know about this process now to update these learnings because it wasn’t that long ago that we thought once you had these learnings that they were permanent. You might be able to cope. You might be able to reduce the intensity, but you were stuck with them. Thank goodness through research and science now we know that this is not true. That these old emotional memories can be activated in the moment and then they become flexible or pliable. That data or that file becomes updatable. We can open the spreadsheet. We can update the data. We can add new data through new experiences, but we can also make it so that the brain waits the old data less. And this is the coolest thing in the world to know that we can revise these learnings. We activate it. We introduce what’s called a disconfirmation experience or a congruence experiment that introduces a prediction error. These are all fancy words and what they mean is when we activate the old learning, like if I have a need, I’ll be punished, shamed, or abandoned. And we touch into some of that sadness or fear or terror or anger, whatever it might be. And then we have a new experience where let’s say we might try on telling the barista they gave us the wrong drink and asking them to remake it. Your system may react as if something very dangerous is happening. Your heart might race. You might feel nauseous. You want to bolt. You want to just take the drink you paid $7 for and not say anything. But then you do it and they say, oh, sorry about that. I’ll fix it. Or even if they say, fine, I’ll fix it. You get to observe in real time. You get to take off those old lenses little bit, maybe look over the top of the lenses and say, oh, okay, that sucked. I didn’t enjoy that that much, but it wasn’t dangerous. And in that moment, that is what updates the memory. That is what updates the learning. Now, not every new experience can be that simple. It takes time. And sometimes we start with imaginal experiments, meaning we just think in our mind about what it would be like if that happened. But these prediction errors, when they match and are targeted to the old learning, can update it. So it’s not helpful to just slap an affirmation on and say, I am completely safe to have needs, because you don’t believe it. That is way too big in connection to that old emotional learning, and you haven’t learned that it’s true. (16:24 - 20:16) But when we can try these little steps on at a time of like, oh, part of me expected disaster in that moment, and yet nothing terrible happened. When we hold the both, what we expected and what actually happened, that is what opens the door to reconsolidation. We introduce the mismatch, we juxtapose the old learning and the new learning, and over time and repetition, that learning gets updated. And this structure is laid out in this book for therapists as well, and it’s called the Therapeutic Reconsolidation Process, and it works very similarly. So if you’re a therapist curious about how to activate this in your own work, you can go back and look at that chapter and listen to that episode, or of course, listen on, because we will continue to explore in updating chapters. So a very helpful case in this book, which you heard me reference, is the case of Richard. And Richard comes in because he’s struggling with self-confidence. He’s having a hard time speaking up in meetings, and he comes in thinking, how do I get unstuck from this? And so you might think, oh, he has self-esteem, he doesn’t like himself, he doesn’t trust himself. But what we actually learned is that his father was a very outspoken person, but he was also an aggressor. And so what his learning was is, I must have no confidence at all, or I will become harmful and dominating, and everyone else will hate me. And so in the book, as they move into the transformation phase, Richard was able to practice observing in his day-to-day life when other people speak up in meetings and have good ideas, and everyone responds with relief and appreciation. And that becomes contradictory knowledge for him, a lived experience that can update that learning. And then over the course of our lives, we get verification, which means we get to see it happen over and over again, and then we get to see the shift within ourselves. This is through observation, which is also called metacognition, learning to observe ourselves like a wildlife documentarian with curiosity and neutrality. We also use interoceptive awareness, where we track both our mind and our body. And then we use this memory reconsolidation process to introduce prediction errors, aka new experiences, to make a change. It is normal because we can have many, many learnings for this to take time. It’s normal for there to be partial shifts, or to find a deeper learning when we thought we were working on learning A and another learning pops up. And so noticing is the work. Observing is the work. Continuing to observe and be curious is what will help you with this process over time. This is why I love getting to do this podcast together and to explore and be curious and go slow, because just thinking about things in this different way, shifting the lens a little bit, being curious, observing what happens as you listen or read, that in itself can be a new experience. That in itself can be an opportunity for you to have a moment where it clicks and you say, oh, maybe I’m not doing this because I’m bad or I’m not trying hard enough or whatever it might be. When you observe that and notice that, oh, moment, that can be a new experience we’re introducing to your brain, where you learn to observe yourself versus criticize yourself. And so we know that this process takes time. To take it more slowly, to learn to observe things in a different way, we do have to take it slowly. We do have to process little by little. That is the way the brain and nervous system work. Unfortunately, we can’t rush or push towards this huge change that we might see on social media, even though a part of us might want to. And the part of us that wants to be this big, huge change can also be a part of a deeper learning that says, I’m not acceptable as I am. (20:17 - 21:19) But if we zoom out and we notice that we can learn to be in connection with ourselves, to let our symptoms and strategies make sense, to learn to be more neutral and observe our experience, to insert a tiny pause in between a stimulus and a response, and then to learn to have new experiences that allow us to see things as they are in the present and how they were in the past, that we can update our brain, we can update our learnings, and we can change our lives in that process. So we’re not here to memorize these steps as a formula, but just to notice, maybe 1% more, that your experience makes sense. There is a pathway for change that doesn’t require force and fear and bullying. Your brain and nervous system are wired to learn. They are neuroplastic. They are able to change, but they need the right conditions. (21:20 - 22:26) So as we continue to work through this book together, we’re going to keep coming back to these foundations. We’re going to look at how different therapies you might already know, like somatic work and IFS, are all using versions of this process, even if they use a different language for it, and we’ll keep talking about how this applies to our real lives, how to implement this in our day-to-day. So check in with yourself. Notice in your thoughts, emotions, and body sensations what might be coming up as you listen. Is there a symptom or a pattern that comes up where you say, oh, that might be true for other people, but not about me, or where some part of you wants to figure out how to take this information and make a spreadsheet, make a plan, make a checklist? Then maybe just for a moment, you could notice, this is coherent. This strategy makes sense. This symptom protected me in some way, even if I’m not clear on what it is right now, and there may be new routes ahead, even if I can’t see them yet. So thank you for being here. Thank you for listening and reading, and I’m so grateful we get to walk this road together. wishing you tiny glimmers ahead, trisha p.s. If you’re interested in learning more about how to apply this IRL, you can still join me for my 5 Steps to Change Live Class (also recorded!). I’d love to see you there! This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit trishawolfe.substack.com/subscribe

  • Dec 6, 2025 · 13 min

    Terms of attachment: the unspoken rules running your life

    This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit trishawolfe.substack.com Hello and welcome back to our book club read-a-long of Unlocking the Emotional Brain! If you’re new here, I release a new podcast episode every two weeks, where we explore a chapter from the book together (you can also listen on Spotify!). I help translate the theory into everyday language and show you how to apply it in your own life. We also gather twice per book for live meetings where you can connect with others, share reflections, and ask questions in real time. This book takes us deep into the science of memory reconsolidation, one of the most powerful mechanisms for true and lasting change. It helps us understand how healing actually happens after trauma, attachment wounds, or growing up with emotionally immature parents. If you’ve been wanting to go deeper into this kind of work, becoming a paid subscriber gives you access to the full book club experience, including live sessions, current discussions, and the complete archive of past reads like No Bad Parts, Healing Developmental Trauma, and Adult Children of Emotionally Immature Parents. Your support makes this community possible, and I’m so grateful you’re here. This week, we dive into chapter 5, which goes further into attachment and the role it takes in shaping the way we see the world as adults. We know it’s not always attachment, that other things like societal and existential concerns can also create trauma patterns and survival strategies, but attachment sure plays a significant role! This chapter is incredibly dense, but it can help us continue to observe ourselves with more neutrality and understanding (and maybe even compassion!) when we’re examining behaviors we don’t like in the present day. Let’s dive in and learn more! (0:00 - 4:15) Welcome back, read-along friends, and thank you so much for being here. If you’re new here, this is our book club, where we dive into different self-help and therapy books, and every two weeks I release a little podcast episode, breaking down a chapter for you and helping you to understand how you might apply this in real life. You can read along with me, but you don’t have to. You can never pick up the book at all and still get the gist from these episodes. So I’m so glad you’re here as we continue to dive into Unlocking the Emotional Brain, an incredibly dense and incredibly informative book, and I think actually today we’re going to continue our exploration of chapter five, and we may not even get through it all. We’ll see. I want to, but it’s such a dense chapter and such an important chapter that I want to make sure that we take our time. Don’t forget that we have our first of two live meetings for this book coming up on Sunday, December 14th, and that is at 12 p.m. Eastern Time. You’ll receive the link in a separate email coming this week, but that’s 12 p.m. Eastern Time, Sunday, December 14th. Don’t worry if you can’t attend live. The recording will be sent out to all paid members, and thank you so much for being here and supporting my work. So you may remember, as we just briefly touched into chapter five last time, the chapter five explores attachment, and is it always about attachment? And so we know that, especially in modern discourse, there’s somewhat the idea that all roads in therapy and all problems that present in therapy can be tied back to attachment with our parents, and this chapter really dives into some of the attachment science and looks at this idea that there’s often more going on to our experience than just attachment with our parents. It doesn’t mean that attachment might not be involved in some way, meaning our connection to the world around us, to peers, etc., because we know that we are pack animals and we are biologically wired to want to stay in connection with those around us. But does it always come back to a childhood attachment experience with parents? And let’s talk a little bit about that. We know that unlocking the emotional brain is all about emotional learnings and how the experiences we have in our lives and those emotions that go along with them form implicit, meaning unconscious, memories and learnings within our brain that direct our behaviors in our present-day lives. Those learnings can come from, certainly, attachment relationships with caregivers, but they can also come from social contexts like schools, friendships, bullying, racism, layoffs, and also existential experiences. And this is what I don’t see talked about too often, so I’m so glad they mentioned it here, like illnesses, accidents, loss, or confrontation with our own mortality. All of those experiences can create these schemas, and you can think of schemas like templates within our brain, for thoughts, emotions, behavioral sensations, and behaviors. And those schemas hold up those if-then rules. If this happens, this is what I must do to stay safe, to stay in connection, to be loved, to be well, etc. And those all get held in the same place, that emotional, implicit, unconscious memory. And this is part of the emotional coherence framework. So instead of arguing about whether attachment or social class or temperament or whatever is more important, instead we know that the brain doesn’t care which category the experience falls under. If something happens, and you might have heard me say this, if it’s frequent or if it’s intense, no matter the source of the experience, then the brain will file that as a learning in the brain. (4:16 - 4:36) And so that could include, like, implicit learnings and procedural learnings could include riding a bike, handwriting, things that don’t really have a lot of emotion stored alongside of them. But when there’s emotion stored alongside of them, then those emotional, implicit learnings become even stronger. So it’s all these rivers flowing into one wide delta. (4:36 - 10:06) One river might be attachment. One might be social experiences. One might be existential experiences. One might be your innate genetic sensitivity. But once those rivers meet in the delta, all of that water blends together. And so what we’re living with in the present is our felt-sense experience of all of the things that make us us. And this can be important because sometimes people will ask me, well, is it possible that this didn’t come from my childhood? And the answer is yes, of course. We can experience environmental, emotional, developmental, and attachment ruptures at any time in our life because we’re always developing. We’re always experiencing the world and relationships around us. And you may remember the case of Raul, which we discussed briefly last time, where he experienced a major rupture in his adult life that created this sense of intense rage. And it didn’t come from a chaotic childhood. It came from a major betrayal from a business partner in adulthood that wrecked his career and threatened his security. And so his emotional brain learned in his adult life after this rupture that broken agreements destroy lives and that rage would protect him from feeling powerless. And that if he let go of rage, that felt like giving up on justice. Those are the implicit emotional learnings that came out of this adult experience. It’s much more than a simple mom, dad, caregiver experience. And so if the therapist had assumed that that had to come from the parents, then classic sort of reparative attachment work would not have touched the schema. So whether you’re a therapist listening or whether you’re an individual who wants to do this in your own life, I think it’s important to hold that lens of curiosity. And that’s why I’m constantly emphasizing curiosity, neutrality, and observation. If you’ve listened to any of my work, you’ve heard me say a million times about observing, observing, observing. Observing is the work. Noticing is the work. And you’ve heard me compare it to an archeological dig or to being a wildlife documentarian. In this book, they call it an anthropologist, that we are learning how to observe and gather data without making assumptions, without letting all those lenses color our experience. And so that’s why it’s very important, therapist or individual, to observe ourselves with this curious lens instead of trying to project what we think the experience might be about. That’s why we use all of these different experiences. Like if you’ve looked in my five steps to change guide, that’s why what I say is to imagine what you want for yourself, whatever it might be. And then you follow the thread from there. You look at the detours that come up. You look at the learnings underneath of that. And sometimes it’s surprising because sometimes the learning is something unexpected. Like this person could have very easily assumed, well, maybe I’m angry and rageful because I never saw my parents be angry. So I never learned how to manage it. And hey, maybe there could be a thread of that there, right? But this learning very clearly in this case came from this person’s adult life and working with those learnings and reconsolidating them is what allowed him to have space. So all this to say, attachment is incredibly important and it shapes a huge amount of our internal atlas, but it’s not the only thing that shapes us. And not all of our symptoms are attachment derived with our caretakers. They can also be from the world around us. And what I mean by that is we are always navigating attachment relationships with partners, with friends, children, even colleagues, right? We’re in connection with people all the time. So we can think about it as connection related and not necessarily parent caregiver attachment related. So while we’re not explicitly exploring attachment here, I think it’s important to talk about some of the attachment types they talk about in this chapter to see what kind of learnings and schemas might develop from that. So the insecure avoidant type of attachment develops with a primary caregiver who is rejecting, pushing away. And so the child learns to expect that pushing away in response to any expression that the child has of emotion, of distress, of a need, or even of playfulness, of silliness, of joy, or an approach for contact, for care. And we saw this in the Emotionally Immature Parent book, that the child comes in and they are rebuffed, they are pushed away. And so that means that the infant feels that there is a problem, obviously, right? And so the infant learns that their distress can be kept to a minimum if they don’t try to seek that connection, if they don’t feel, if they don’t express their feelings, if they don’t communicate or have any attention on them. And this can be accomplished by dissociation, shutting yourself down. This can be accomplished by quote-unquote intellectualizing. Obviously, an infant can’t intellectualize, but there’s that same functional freeze experience of learning how to grip and shut down the emotions. And that is a solution to the problem. So we know always that symptoms are coherent. They’re a closed system. Symptoms are in direct response to a suffering, and they create a solution. (10:07 - 11:26) They create a lesser of two sufferings. In this case, the infant has learned to respond to the implicit knowledge. And the implicit knowledge is that the need for contact or seeking contact will lead to rejection, aloneness, terror, and helplessness. So the solution of avoiding both feelings and contact is incredibly adaptive. We know all symptoms make sense, and this symptom makes perfect sense. So this schema might present as adults who are quote-unquote dismissive because they will greatly downplay experiences, likely because they are in that shut down, dissociated, withdrawn state. And so they very much might appear as supercilious, holier than thou, intellectualized, prideful about not being overly emotional. And that’s not because they are bad people. It’s because that is the schema in which they developed. Then we have insecure ambivalent or insecure resistance, which uses the opposite strategy, right? So this strategy is the biggest emotional display because we’re adapting to a different problem. In this case, we have a caregiver who is inept, disconnected. Maybe they’re unwell themselves. (11:27 - 11:35) Maybe they’re preoccupied with their own experience, mental illness. Maybe there’s financial stress. Maybe they don’t know how to be with their child’s emotions. (11:35 - 13:41) But sometimes they’re responsive, especially if the child’s behavior is intense enough to attract their attention. And so you get that slot machine effect, right? That intermittent reinforcement, which we know from research produces a very strong learning. And the child learns, of course, this is all unconscious, that that intense neediness, the big emotions, throwing a tantrum or not feeling well and making kind of a big show about it, is required for getting attention. But remember, it’s not reliable. Because of that slot machine effect, we can’t always rely on the parent to respond. But the infant is always trying to make it happen. And so this can kind of come out as this controlling, manipulative, sort of relentless style of interacting, where you’re always hypervigilant to the state of the caregiver, the presence of the caregiver. And this as an adult, that becomes hypervigilantly preoccupied with your partner’s emotional involvement, their presence, how they’re relating to you, and that quote unquote, neediness, right, that can include big emotions, big hurt of trying to pull the partner back in. And remember, that symptom is coherent.

  • Dec 3, 2025 · 19 min

    When healing becomes another project (free podcast)

    Hello, tiny sparks readers! Have a new podcast episode for you today about my thoughts on the endless optimization of healing. Before we dive in, I want to share something tender and exciting. I have just started writing a book and was recently accepted into a 12-month writing program to help bring it to life, with the hope of it landing in the world in 2026. If you want to be part of that process and help me actually make it happen, you can join me over on Patreon, where I will share in-progress pieces, reflections, and the middle of shaping this work. There are a few tiers, including one that offers a live meeting every month where I answer your questions personally. If this episode landed for you and you want to support this book growing from an idea into something you can hold in your hands, your presence there really does make a difference. In addition, becoming a paid subscriber here supports my writing, too, and you get to join our wonderful book club! Whether you’re a free or paid subscriber, thank you for being here. If you have questions, curiosities, or things you’d love to see addressed in my book, don’t hesitate to drop me a line or leave a comment below! (0:00 - 2:44) Okay, today I want to talk about something that might sound a little bit strange coming from someone who literally teaches about healing for a living, but I am so, so tired of the self-help industry and especially the social mediafication of the self-help industry. Of course, I am not tired of people wanting to feel better. Of course, we want to feel better. And of course, we are trying to find any amount of information we can to help us feel better. And I’m not tired of those of us who are curious or want to grow or want to explore nervous system work or trauma healing. But I am so tired of the way that healing has been turned into a product for us to consume and complete and be perfect at and overachieve at and try harder at, like a course you have to pass or some kind of project that you have to finish. And if you are someone who tends to live in your head, who’s always been the high achiever, the eldest daughter, the responsible one, the intellectualizer, you probably know exactly what I mean. You go into this idea of healing or being more present in your life or getting unstuck, moving toward what you want for yourself, using the same tools that have always worked for you. You research, you read, you analyze, you organize the information in your mind. And once you set your mind to it, you decide that you’re going to do this right. And the internet is set up for the parts of us that think that we can do this perfectly by making a plan and trying harder and researching it to the bitter end. That is what the self-help world, especially the self-help world on social media, is built upon. And it gives us this steady stream of little bite-sized promises. Do this journal prompt, reflect on your year, say an affirmation, set a boundary, cut contact, breathe in this way, no, breathe in that way, cold punch, don’t cold punch, stretch your hips, drink your water, take your supplements. And there’s this message that if you can get the formula just right, if you do enough, if you try hard enough, if you’re good enough, you will finally be okay, feel good, have the life you want, and specifically have the life that you might see represented on social media. People who seem so happy, so successful, perfect family, perfect house, perfect friends, plenty of money. And so it’s normal that we’re drawn toward these things. We want there to be something that we can do that will make us feel okay. Of course, some other part of us also deeply resists that because it feels impossible. We feel stuck in this bind of needing to be perfect to be okay, but feeling like it’s impossible to actually follow through with all of those things. And that’s not because there’s anything wrong with you. (2:44 - 4:58) It’s because our brain works based off old learnings getting landed into the present. It’s so, so understandable that we want something to be a checklist that we can move through and complete. We want to fill out a worksheet. We want to make a few meals, take a few supplements, do some deep breathing, and wake up in a completely different place with a different relationship to ourselves and to the world. A different job maybe, a different personality, a different partner, a different relationship to money, whatever it might be. But that’s not how these patterns that were built for survival reorganize themselves. And for those of us who grew up reading the room constantly, reading people around us constantly, knowing the sound of everyone’s footsteps and whether it meant they were happy or angry, then people-pleasing, intellectualizing, perfectionism, overachieving are not random bad habits and they’re not personality traits. They are learned responses to our environments. If we learned that having big feelings got us shamed or ignored, then shutting down those feelings makes a lot of sense. If you rewarded and celebrated every time you achieved or functioned so well, took on more and solved the problem, then of course that learning would get set up in your brain to say, this is what makes me good and worthy. And many times it’s subtle, right? Like sometimes we had very clear trauma or sometimes it was very clear that our parents criticized us when we had emotions or sent us away. But oftentimes it’s so much more subtle than that. It’s an ongoing experience of being misattuned to. If you are a joyful, playful little child born to parents who are under immense stress and they themselves are intellectualizers or incredibly rational people who don’t know how to deal with their own feelings, it’s not that they might hurt you or punish you when you have feelings, but they themselves might become overwhelmed. And so then we learn, uh-oh, when I am playful, silly, joyful myself, people around me get overwhelmed and that makes me feel stressed and unsafe because I need my caregivers to be okay. (4:59 - 5:42) Or maybe it’s our peers, maybe it’s our teachers. And yes, we can have experiences in our adult life that impact us as well. But all of these things get coded in our brains as roots of safety, worth, value, and connection. So then you come into healing spaces because sometime in your life, and it’s usually later on in our life, it starts to take more of a toll. And maybe we notice physical symptoms, maybe we feel slightly depressed, disconnected, anxious, but we’re not sure why, kind of stuck or dissatisfied in our lives, and we want to fix those patterns. But things start to get slippery because we might feel this pull into healing and we turn it into another pattern. tiny sparks - trisha wolfe is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. (5:42 - 7:05) We want to be good at it, we want to solve it, we want to get an A in therapy, we want to do trauma recovery work, check it off the list, let them be codependent no more, get our body to stop keeping the score, and then we will be good enough to deserve to rest and relax. And this is where self-help becomes so incredibly toxic because so much of it mirrors the very same culture that we have already been mired in and are already burned out from. There is a focus on progress, optimization, and improvement of our behavior. Even somatic work has become an idea that you need to optimize your nervous system, you need to optimize your body. If you’re an intellectualizer, you just need to learn how to track your body. Somatic work, somatic work, fix your nervous system, stretch your hips, and then you can let all your emotions go and then you will be well. So it’s pressure, pressure, pressure, morning routines, five-step systems, and very, very tidy before and after stories, which just feeds right into those beliefs. And the brain says, see, if you just try hard enough and plan enough and analyze enough, and then you can finally be worthy and be good. And these other people did it. Why can’t you? Why can’t you be more productive, more regulated, more aligned? Why can’t you follow through with these activities? And so maybe you try it. You know, you see the posts on Instagram and you give it a try. You do the journaling, the affirmations, try to track your body. (7:06 - 14:35) And for a little while, that can feel exciting. And we get a little dopamine, we get a little oxytocin, we feel a spark that this will be the thing, the thing that finally makes it okay for us to say no, to be present, to want something different, to have needs, to not have to worry about being disapproved of, to not have to explain ourselves and criticize ourselves constantly. But then eventually something happens. Either we turn on ourselves or we stop doing the things because we’re tired or exhausted, or some part of our brain says, nope, that’s not safe. You’re going off the survival pathways. Maybe someone gets disappointed in us. A relationship shifts and boom, we’re right back in those old patterns, overthinking, overexplaining, over-apologizing, over-criticizing. And now that we have all these self-help messages, when we see that happen, because of course we can observe it, right? We can observe these things happening. Well, the only answer is that it must be something wrong with us. And then we get fed this message that we’re too self-aware. And then maybe we go to therapy and we even get told we’re too self-aware for therapy. We already know so much, so why are we here? Which again just feeds into this idea that something must be wrong with us. The mindset, the discipline, we’re not doing enough. We’re self-aware, we can’t make the change. We can’t even fit in in therapy. Something really must be wrong with us. We must be our eyes at everything. Healing is fake. Nothing works. This is stupid. I want to offer us a different picture. And the picture is that you and your brain are not bad or wrong. You’re neither too self-aware nor not self-aware enough. You are a human with a brain that is made up of all of your past experiences, that is predicting what is going to happen in the present. What is the probability that something safe is going to happen versus something dangerous? And it has been paying attention for your whole life about what happens when you speak up, when you rest, when you cry, when you ask for help, when you don’t mask, when you put on a show, when you get angry, when you succeed, when you fail. And it’s built up a whole atlas in your brain on what to expect. And this is all filed away unconsciously. We’re not even actively aware that we’re doing it. We may become actively aware of the patterns through our endless analysis and intellectualization, but that doesn’t change the automatic pattern that is embedded in the implicit side of your brain. So when you set a boundary or you try or you think about setting a boundary or saying no or whatever it is, and you feel a rush of panic afterward, that is the predictive pattern getting set off where your brain said that was something dangerous. That’s not something that leads to more connection. And so maybe you criticize yourself, you feel panic, you feel like you need to make up for setting the boundary by like getting the person a gift or something like that. That is that brain saying you went down a route that is unsafe and now I need to get you back to the safe route and the safe route is not having boundaries, not having needs. Or maybe you do go to therapy and you have this wonderful insight, then you go home and you repeat the very same behavior that you just unpacked. It’s not because you didn’t listen. It’s not because you self-sabotaged. It’s because your brain does not have a route that says that new behavior is safe or that that stopping that old behavior is safe. And so self-help is not designed to talk to these implicit learnings, to remap our brain, our predictive survival pathways. It’s only talking to the part of us that consumes information and makes lists. It’s very behavioral oriented. And yes, even self-help that is targeted toward trauma learning is very much about have new experiences, try harder, set a boundary, feel your body, share your emotions. All of those things are behaviors that feel unsafe. And so doing those things will push us out of our window of tolerance, no matter how smart we are, no matter how hard we try. And it can become quicksand really quickly because the more we turn healing into a job or something to analyze or intellectualize, the louder the survival patterns get. Perfectionism sneaks in everywhere, people-pleasing shows up, over-functioning shows up, we over-functioning even on trying to help ourselves feel better. So we might try to install these new behavioral habits, but those old survival pathways are still the way our brain will take us when we are living outside of that window of tolerance. So then what do we do if the answer is to not just try harder? Because we don’t want to just give up. And I think the first step is really being truthful and honest about the time scale that your brain built these maps over years and years of repetition, usually under stress. And so they’re not going to reorganize overnight, even if you do the affirmations, even if you do the journaling, even if you eat the food that you think you need to eat. They will not reorganize overnight because none of us are going to be the exception to the rules of neuroscience. Now there are mechanisms of change that can help speed up the process. Nonetheless, it will be a process, just like building new roads in real life. It is a process. And we also have to stop pretending that insight is equal to integration. We love insight. We love seeing patterns. We love that. But that is not changing the route. And for us intellectualizers and overachievers and perfectionists, the temptation is to stay in the insight because that’s where we feel comfortable. We get a rush every time we have a new insight and say, okay, got it now. I’m going to be different. But your body still tightens up. Your throat still closes. You still get in your own way. You still criticize yourself. You still overwork. It’s not a moral failing. Remember, it is those safety pathways and the built-in detours that your brain has to get you back onto the safety pathways. So this is why I often think about the work that I do as kind of the anti-self-help self-help. I know it sounds silly, but I do care deeply about giving people tools and language to understand themselves and to understand their brains, to remap and rewire their brain toward new ways of being in their life. But I’m also not interested in trying to hand you another system that you can try and not succeed at, not because you failed, but because it’s going against your survival brain, because that doesn’t quite sit right with me either. I want you to have an understanding of your patterns. It’s not just insight, but that truly allows you to see the mechanisms that are happening in your brain and allows you to understand the mechanisms that have to happen to change and rewire those pathways. I want you to see how deeply logical your overthinking, self-sabotage, people-pleasing, perfectionism, hyper-independence is. I want you to understand that all of those things are representative of survival pathways, adaptive strategies in your brain that are happening because your brain is predicting if you don’t do them, something dangerous will happen. No matter how much you say you know nothing dangerous will happen, this is not a conscious experience. It’s implicit. Implicit like handwriting, right? It’s below the surface. We’re not thinking about it actively. We have to make these things explicit to be able to work with them, but understanding them as protective allows us to use a little bit of a different lens. So when we use this lens of rewiring our brain and understanding our predictive brain rather than endless self-optimization, we get to see things a little bit more clearly. (14:36 - 16:57) So if we overcommit, we might say, I need to optimize this. I need to say no, have better boundaries. I’m just going to start saying no and stop people-pleasing. I’m going to read a book about boundaries, go to the library, get the book, read all that, and then of course you don’t follow through because your body floods with fear or guilt or dread or you criticize yourself, you tell yourself other people’s needs are more important, or you don’t even realize it and somehow you’ve over-scheduled yourself again. And then you might end up back in an anxiety spiral or telling yourself that you failed. But in this lens, we might get curious about noticing how saying yes is a way to stay safe, what the learning is underneath of that, what we’re protecting ourselves from. Maybe times you felt like a burden. Maybe times it felt like meeting something upset other people in your lives. Maybe times adults around you were stressed or unpredictable and you learned to make yourself low maintenance. We would see that as an adaptation and we would see all the detours that keep you on that safe adaptation road, the self-criticism, the busyness, the functional freeze of disconnecting and just going into autopilot. And instead of demanding that you stop, we would play around with observing and noticing because we know observing and noticing alone actually helps the rewiring. And then we would get to a place where we can start doing little mini congruence experiments in the present. We could imagine doing something different and noticing what happens even just by imagining it. It allows us to see the learning differently and relate to the learning differently because we can pluck out that old learning that might say having needs makes other people not like me or having needs is selfish. And we can show the brain something different that’s happening in the present where we can experience in real time that having needs is not selfish. Now, it’s not that simple, right? We can’t just prove to ourselves that having needs isn’t selfish, but through these experiments, either imagining them or acting them out in real time, we can actually rewire our brain. That process is called memory reconsolidation and it invokes neuroplasticity in our brain, which allows our brain to form new neural pathways and allows us to repattern our own attachment to ourselves and provide co-regulation to ourselves. Now, that process is kind of boring from a self-optimization process. (16:57 - 17:37) It’s kind of boring to the algorithm. It’s not quite as fun as doing affirmations and journaling and drinking water and then magically being fixed, but it is realistic. It is founded in the science of how our brain works and it is actually the quickest and most effective way to actually do this change. Now, you might be listening to this and thinking, I don’t know how to design those kinds of experiments. I don’t know how to work with these patterns without making it a checklist or something to hold myself up a yardstick to measure myself against. And yeah, you’re right. (17:37 - 19:49) You don’t. You don’t have neural pathways for this yet. Or if you do, because you’ve heard this before, the roadways are kind of back roads, they’re potholes, they’re dirt. Your brain’s not yet comfortable driving down them, but it is possible to build those roadways over time. Not on the timeline of social media, but on your own timeline of observing, noticing, building safety, and rewiring our brain. And this is exactly the work that I am building. This is the work of change. This is the anti-self-help, self-help. When you understand that all forms of therapy and all forms of self-help are trying to mimic these mechanisms of change, but not quite hitting the mark, because these mechanisms of change are not behavioral, then it becomes clear. We have to work with the neural pathways, the predictive patterns, the survival adaptations first, and behavior change comes second. Down the line. Behavior change becomes so much easier when our brain is not telling us, for example, that taking care of ourselves is dangerous. Then you don’t need to obsess and plan and buy a new checklist and sign up for a new course and harangue yourself because you didn’t get it quite right. So for right now, maybe you can notice the ways that you’re trying to make healing into self-optimization tasks. Maybe you can notice the posts you save on social media that promise you a fast fix through journaling, through affirmations, through breathwork. And you can notice what feels good about those ideas, and you can notice what might create pressure out of those ideas, because it’s not that those ideas can ever be helpful. But to notice what are we trying to get at. If I do this breathwork, and I journal, and I do affirmations, how is it I will feel? What will my life, how will my life be different? That is going to reveal what we want, and that is where we can start to gain clarity about what is getting blocked. If you want to learn more about this, this is the work that I do every day on social media, in the courses I teach, I have free guides. Ironically, yes, it is called five steps to change, but it’s not like that. It’s not a simple five-step snap your fingers and you’re out the door. It’s an iterative process to allow you to remap or rewire your brain. And I would love to hear your thoughts, questions, and curiosities. And thanks for being here. Thanks for reading tiny sparks - trisha wolfe! This post is public so feel free to share it. Opportunities to work with me: * On January 11th, I’ll be teaching a live class called 5 Steps to Long-Lasting Change. This class is all about making sense of why change feels so hard, and how we can work with the brain and body to make it easier. I’ll walk you through the framework I’ve developed that weaves together neuroscience, memory reconsolidation, and nervous system regulation. It’s practical, compassionate, and designed to help you not only see what needs to shift, but also learn how to create changes that truly last! If you can’t attend live, the full recording will be available for you. * Also in January, I’ll be opening The Shift 8 Week Immersion, a small group experience for women who already know themselves well, but feel stuck living out the same patterns again and again. This is where we take the lens from my teaching and actually practice it together through live sessions, guided nervous system work, and gentle experiments between meetings. Over eight weeks, we will map your loops, reconnect with your values, and try on small, doable shifts that help you feel safer and make change more possible in real life. If you are craving a space that is structured, supportive, and focused on embodied change rather than more information, this is where we will do that work side by side. * Book club! We just finished up Adult Children of Emotionally Immature Parents, and what a deep experience it was. Next up: Unlocking the Emotional Brain - this book is clinical, but truly informational as the seminal resource on all things coherence therapy, memory reconsolidation, and the science behind why things like EMDR and NARM actually work. By becoming a paid subscriber here on Substack for just $5 a month, you get full access to my biweekly podcast, where I do a deep dive into each chapter, and two live fireside chats, where we connect and explore our learnings together. You also get full access to the archive of the book club, where you can listen to episodes about Adult Children of Emotionally Immature Parents, No Bad Parts, and The Practical Guide for Healing Developmental Trauma - all my favorite books for those who truly want to heal from their past, get unstuck, and start moving forward. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit trishawolfe.substack.com/subscribe

Showing 1–20 of 20 episodes