Skip to content
Artwork for The Dirty Verdict
HistorySociety & CulturePersonal Journals

The Dirty Verdict

Kyle Herbert

Get all the dirty details and legal insights from Houston Lawyers, Kyle Herbert and Peter Taffe, as they explore exciting cases.

Kyle Herbert: https://herberttrial.com
Peter Taaffe: https://comeauxmediation.com/attorney/peter-taaffe/
Bill Ogden: https://fbtrial.com/attorneys/bill-ogden/

Play
  • 22 episodes
  • fortnightly
  • Avg 57 min
  • English
Counted on this page โ€” what you have heard stays on this device, so it is not something the list can be paged by.
  • S5 ยท E22
    September 28 ยท 55 minยท Video

    Adam Funks breaks down medical malpractice cases in Texas.

    In this episode, Adam Funk joins hosts Peter Taaffe, Bill Ogden and Kyle Herbert and gives his insight into medical malpractice law, including common cases, legal procedures, and the impact of tort reform in Texas. Listeners will learn about the nuances of medical malpractice claims, legal strategies, and recent legal developments. Key Topics: -- Medical malpractice standards and common cases -- Legal procedures including notice letters and expert reports -- Impact of tort reform and damages caps in Texas -- Strategies for handling malpractice claims and damages -- Recent legal cases and appellate decisions Chapters 00:00 Introduction to Adam Funk and Medical Malpractice 02:11 Common Types of Medical Malpractice Cases 04:07 Legal Procedures: Notice Letters and Expert Reports 07:01 Impact of Tort Reform and Damages Caps in Texas 09:50 Handling Catastrophic and Caped Cases 15:04 Discovery Challenges and Appellate Issues 20:12 Notable Cases and Legal Strategies 24:52 Economic Damages and Future Medical Care 30:07 Infection, Misdiagnosis, and Other Common Claims 34:55 Impact of AI and Future of Medical Malpractice Law

  • S4 ยท E21
    September 10 ยท 48 minยท Video

    Hanging a Shingle with Matt Mendoza and Hogan Leatherwood

    "You can go broke by answering the phone and saying yes to everybody." On this week's Dirty Verdict Podcast, we sat down with two lawyers who left established firms to hang their own shingle: Matt Mendoza (Mendoza Law Firm, ~2 years in) and Hogan Leatherwood (soon to be Leatherwood & Schindler, ~1 year in). No fluff. Just the real numbers and the real mistakes. ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—บ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐˜† ๐—พ๐˜‚๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป โ†’ Both funded their launch from savings, not loans. Banks want collateral you don't have yet. โ†’ First fee after opening: 3-4 months if you're lucky, 8-18 months is the norm. โ†’ Rule of thumb: don't leave money in the operating account. It'll get spent. Pay yourself first. ๐—ช๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐—ฟ๐˜€๐˜ ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฒ ๐—ณ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—บ โ†’ Not billboards. Not social media. Referrals from people who trusted the lawyer, not the firm name on the door. โ†’ Leaving your old firm on good terms pays dividends for years โ€” both guys still get referrals from former employers. ๐—ข๐—ป ๐—ด๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐˜„๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—บ โ†’ Hire incrementally. Project your case load 3-6 months out before adding headcount. โ†’ A good paralegal is worth their weight in gold โ€” and worth paying like it. โ†’ Zero employees is a legitimate model too. Case management software and AI tools can cover a lot of ground for a true solo. ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜€๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ฝ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐˜๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€ ๐—บ๐—ผ๐˜€๐˜ โ†’ Find a banker before you need one. Every guest on this topic said the same thing: the relationship has to exist before the emergency does. โ†’ Smaller, relationship-driven banks tend to move faster for small firms than the big names. ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ด๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜๐˜€ โ†’ Both wish they'd started sooner. โ†’ Both wish they'd been more selective about which cases they took early on โ€” the "take every call" instinct almost always costs more than it earns. If you're a lawyer thinking about opening your own shop โ€” or you just opened one and you're white-knuckling it โ€” this episode is worth the hour.

  • S4 ยท E21
    September 4 ยท 25 min

    S4 Eps 21: Linsday Clancy Trial Analysis w/ Anthony Osso

    The Dirty Verdict takes on the highly publicized Lindsey Clancy murder trial and the legal battle surrounding her insanity defense. Peter Taaffe, Kyle Herbert, and Bill Ogden are joined by Houston criminal defense attorney Anthony Osso to break down the case, the evidence presented at trial, and the extraordinary circumstances surrounding a jury that appears hopelessly deadlocked. The group examines the prosecution's argument that Clancy understood the wrongfulness of her actions, including evidence surrounding her husband leaving the home before the deaths of their three children. They also discuss the defense's contention that Clancy was suffering from severe postpartum mental illness and could not legally appreciate or control her actions. Anthony explains how insanity defenses work, what happens when a defendant is found not guilty by reason of insanity, and the important differences between Massachusetts and Texas law. The conversation also explores the reported 11โ€“1 jury split, the lone holdout juror, whether a judge can replace a juror during deliberations, and why Clancy's defense attorney may have preferred continued deliberations over a mistrial. The episode concludes with a look at what could happen next if a mistrial is declared, the likelihood prosecutors retry the case, and how the related civil lawsuits against Clancy's medical providers could potentially intersect with future criminal proceedings. Highlights 00:00 โ€“ Introduction & Overview of the Lindsey Clancy Case 01:05 โ€“ The Insanity Defense and the Prosecution's Burden 03:30 โ€“ Patrick Clancy's Testimony & Evidence Surrounding the Killings 10:05 โ€“ Postpartum Mental Health, Medical Providers & Claims the System Failed Her 12:45 โ€“ Prison vs. a Mental Health Facility After an Insanity Verdict 14:55 โ€“ The Deadlocked Jury and Reported 11โ€“1 Split 15:55 โ€“ Why the Defense May Want Continued Deliberations Instead of a Mistrial 20:10 โ€“ Would Prosecutors Retry Lindsey Clancy After a Mistrial? 22:30 โ€“ The Unusual Appeal and Attempt to Stay the Mistrial 23:10 โ€“ Can the Judge Remove and Replace the Holdout Juror? 25:35 โ€“ Civil Lawsuits Against Medical Providers & Their Impact on the Criminal Case 29:00 โ€“ What Happens Next in the Lindsey Clancy Case? Subscribe to The Dirty Verdict for more conversations about major trials, legal news, courtroom strategy, and the stories behind some of the most talked-about cases in the country.

  • S4 ยท E20
    August 21 ยท 1 hr 2 min

    S4 Eps 20: The Dirty Verdict News Edition (8-19-26)

    In this episode of The Dirty Verdict, Peter Taaffe, Bill Ogden, and Kyle Herbert return for a wide-ranging legal news roundup covering some of the strangest lawsuits, biggest verdicts, and most consequential legal questions making headlines. The episode opens with a truly unforgettable lawsuit against Popeyes involving a "condom-like" foreign object allegedly found inside a piece of fried chicken. From there, the conversation turns to the latest developments in the Watson Grinding explosion litigation, including a remarkable story involving a defense expert whose use of ChatGPT was uncovered during discovery. The hosts examine what the incident could mean for expert witnesses, attorneys, AI-generated work product, and the future of legal discovery. The guys also break down a massive $604 million trucking verdict, discussing the expanding potential liability of freight brokers, insurance coverage, Stowers demands, excess exposure, and how these rulings could affect companies throughout the transportation industry. Later, the conversation moves through Houston nightclub lawsuits, a Harris County Children's Museum injury case, Buc-ee's latest trademark fight, and Jayden Daniels' dispute with LSU over the use of his name and likeness. The episode closes with a debate over whether an alleged assault by a surgeon could qualify as medical malpractice and a controversial $150 million federal contract involving legal representation for unaccompanied immigrant children. As always, Peter, Bill, and Kyle mix serious legal analysis with irreverent commentary, trial-lawyer perspective, and plenty of arguments along the way. Episode Highlights 00:44 โ€“ Popeyes Sued Over a "Condom-Like" Object in Fried Chicken 07:45 โ€“ Watson Grinding Explosion Verdict & the 3M Litigation 10:28 โ€“ Defense Expert's ChatGPT Prompts Exposed in Discovery 22:35 โ€“ The $604 Million Trucking Verdict & Broker Liability 29:42 โ€“ Policy Limits, Stowers Exposure & Insurance Coverage 35:08 โ€“ Houston Nightclub Lawsuits & Security Incidents 40:07 โ€“ Harris County Takes on the Children's Museum 42:17 โ€“ Buc-ee's vs. Beaver Mini Mart 46:16 โ€“ Jayden Daniels, LSU & the Fight Over Name and Likeness 51:01 โ€“ Is an Alleged Surgeon Assault "Medical Malpractice"? 54:13 โ€“ The Controversial $150 Million Immigration Legal Contract

  • S4 ยท E19
    August 8 ยท 49 min

    S4 Eps 19: Sherra Gilbert Interview

    On this episode of The Dirty Verdict, Kyle Herbert and Bill Ogden sit down with attorney and mediator Sherra Gilbert for a wide-ranging conversation about the experiences that shaped her career, what she has learned from practicing on both sides of the courtroom, and why preparation can make or break a case long before anyone gets to trial. Sherra shares her journey from growing up in Laredo, Texas, to attending the University of Texas and eventually earning her law degree from Thurgood Marshall School of Law. She discusses beginning her legal career in immigration law, where removal proceedings gave her valuable bench trial experience, before moving through plaintiff-side personal injury, workers' compensation, insurance defense, commercial litigation, and ultimately mediation. The conversation dives into Sherra's years with Farmers Insurance, where she deliberately pursued as much trial experience as possible and developed an appreciation for the ethical responsibility defense attorneys owe to the insuredโ€”not simply the insurance carrier. After nearly a decade of insurance defense work and additional experience handling commercial and trucking cases, Sherra transitioned toward mediation, becoming board certified and beginning her mediation practice in 2019. From there, the group gets into the realities of modern personal injury litigation: attorneys arriving at mediation unprepared, cases sitting unresolved because nobody has properly evaluated them, unrealistic expectations about case value, and the importance of understanding a case from both the plaintiff and defense perspectives. Sherra explains why a mediator's outside perspective can expose weaknesses the lawyers handling a case every day may no longer see. They also discuss the increased pressure Texas courts are putting on attorneys to move cases toward trial, how aggressive trial settings are changing settlement dynamics, and why attorneys who prepare their cases early may actually benefit from the faster pace. Sherra explains how looming trial dates are creating urgency around mediation and forcing both sides to take a hard look at the strengths and weaknesses of their cases. As always, the legal discussion comes with plenty of Dirty Verdict detours, courtroom stories, friendly shots at fellow attorneys, and the kind of unscripted conversation that happens when Kyle and Bill are left mostly unsupervised. Main Highlights 03:27 โ€” Growing Up in Laredo & Learning Spanish Sherra discusses moving to Laredo as a child, growing up in a family of educators, becoming fluent in Spanish, and how that background later became an advantage in her legal career. 12:42 โ€” From UT to Law School After graduating from the University of Texas at only 20 years old, Sherra works in marketing, commercial printing, and copier sales before pursuing the legal career she had long envisioned. 19:34 โ€” Thurgood Marshall & Breaking Into Immigration Law Sherra explains attending Thurgood Marshall School of Law, the strength of its alumni community, and how speaking Spanish drew her toward immigration law and removal proceedings. 24:59 โ€” Moving From Immigration to Personal Injury After gaining extensive bench trial experience in immigration, Sherra moves into plaintiff-side personal injury and workers' compensation while searching for the kind of litigation work that fit her competitive personality. 28:20 โ€” Farmers Insurance & Learning to Try Cases Sherra joins Farmers specifically to gain jury trial experience, taking on JP cases and other matters whenever she could in order to become comfortable trying cases in front of judges and juries. 33:05 โ€” The Ethical Duty of Insurance Defense Lawyers Sherra discusses one of the biggest lessons from her defense career: although an insurance carrier may be paying the bill, the lawyer's ethical obligation belongs to the insured. 35:42 โ€” Becoming a Mediator After becoming board certified and spending more than eight years with Farmers, Sherra begins mediating in 2019 and brings her plaintiff and defense experience into the mediation room. 36:37 โ€” How Lawyers Sabotage Their Own Cases Sherra explains how poor preparation hurts both sidesโ€”from plaintiffs failing to present important evidence to defense attorneys arriving at mediation without adequate authority or a meaningful case evaluation. 39:09 โ€” Why Sherra Still Tries Cases Despite focusing heavily on mediation, Sherra discusses returning to the courtroom, trying a recent case with Kim Spurlock, and why continuing to litigate helps her stay connected to what attorneys and clients are experiencing. 41:35 โ€” Catastrophic Injuries vs. Everyday PI Cases The group discusses the major difference between genuinely catastrophic injury cases and routine soft-tissue claims, along with the challenges of managing litigation expenses when policy limits are relatively small. 42:48 โ€” Courts Are Pushing Cases to Trial Faster Sherra, Kyle, and Bill examine the growing pressure on lawyers to move cases, judges becoming less willing to grant continuances, and why attorneys who prepare early have a major advantage when a court suddenly says, "You're going to trial." 46:21 โ€” Why Trial Dates Make Mediation More Effective Sherra explains how firm trial settings create urgency, force lawyers to evaluate cases seriously, and make mediation an important opportunity for an independent third party to identify problems both sides may have overlooked. 47:45 โ€” Mediator's Proposals & What a Case Is Really Worth The episode closes with a discussion about mediator's proposals, why they aren't necessarily a declaration of a case's true value, and how circumstances can change dramatically between mediation and the eventual settlement.

  • S4 ยท E18
    July 10 ยท 59 min

    S4 Eps 18: Leigh Lewis Interview

    On this episode of The Dirty Verdict, hosts Peter Taaffe and Kyle Herbert welcome attorney and mediator Leigh Lewis to discuss her transition from a successful insurance-defense practice to full-time mediation. Leigh reflects on growing up in Midland, Texas, studying environmental management at Duke University, attending the University of Texas School of Law, and building a litigation career that included approximately 30 jury trials and 16 years with Walters, Balido & Crain. The conversation includes some of Leigh's most unusual product-liability cases, the realities of preparing unpredictable clients for trial, and what plaintiff attorneys can do to improve their chances of reaching a favorable settlement at mediation. Leigh also offers a behind-the-scenes perspective on how defense attorneys and insurance carriers evaluate claims, witnesses, medical records, experts, venues, opposing counsel, and potential jury verdicts. The episode concludes with a discussion about overwhelmed court dockets, Leigh's decision to leave litigation for mediation, and the growing opportunities and privacy concerns surrounding the use of artificial intelligence in legal cases. Major Topics Discussed 00:00 โ€” Introducing Leigh Lewis and Her Move to Mediation 03:34 โ€” Growing Up in Midland and the Path to Law School 10:04 โ€” Building a Career in Insurance-Defense Litigation 12:18 โ€” Leigh's Most Unusual Product-Liability Cases 19:18 โ€” Jury Trials, Client Preparation, and Unpredictable Witnesses 25:21 โ€” How Plaintiff Attorneys Can Prepare for a Successful Mediation 37:01 โ€” How the Plaintiff and Defense Bars Share Information Differently 47:26 โ€” Leaving Litigation, Becoming a Mediator, and the Use of AI in Legal Cases

  • S4 ยท E17
    June 26 ยท 1 hr 7 min

    S4 Eps 17: Anthony Vessel Interview

    In this episode of The Dirty Verdict, Peter Taaffe and Bill Ogden sit down with attorney Anthony Vessel of Marc Whitehead & Associates for a deep dive into a practice area many lawyers encounter but few truly understand: disability benefits, insurance denials, Social Security disability, veterans disability claims, and ERISA litigation. Anthony walks through how he found his way from Beaumont, Texas, to Texas A&M, South Texas College of Law, and ultimately into the highly specialized world of disability and benefits law. The conversation breaks down the realities of long-term disability policies, the challenges claimants face when insurance companies deny benefits, and why ERISA cases can be so difficult for plaintiffs. The discussion also covers life insurance disputes, Social Security disability hearings, veterans disability claims, administrative law judges, and the importance of building a strong record before a case ever reaches federal court. Anthony also shares how his firm uses the Entrepreneurial Operating System to manage teams, track progress, and keep cases from falling through the cracks. The episode wraps with Anthony's passion for mediation, the value of trust in resolving cases, and why lawyers should know who to call when disability, VA, Social Security, or benefit denial issues come across their desk. Major Topics Discussed 00:00:14 โ€” Introduction to Anthony Vessel and Marc Whitehead & Associates 00:02:16 โ€” Anthony's Beaumont background and early legal influences 00:05:00 โ€” College, baseball, and the road to law school 00:09:00 โ€” How Anthony entered disability and benefits law 00:12:25 โ€” Long-term disability claims, ERISA, and insurance denials 00:15:14 โ€” Life insurance claims and accelerated benefit disputes 00:22:41 โ€” Social Security disability and private disability coverage 00:30:38 โ€” Veterans disability claims and service-connected impairments 00:35:31 โ€” Social Security hearings and administrative law judges 00:43:05 โ€” Law firm leadership, EOS, and team organization 00:54:17 โ€” Case value, referrals, and "triple threat" disability clients 00:56:09 โ€” Anthony's mediation work and ADR background 01:00:20 โ€” Mediation in disability cases and settlement strategy

  • S4 ยท E16
    June 13 ยท 1 hr 6 min

    S4 Eps 16: Tyler Skaggs Death Case & Paxton Trial Panel Interview

    In this episode of The Dirty Verdict, Peter Taaffe, Bill Ogden, and Kyle Herbert sit down with Laura Hollingsworth, Dana Levy, Leah Graham, and Daniel Dutko for a deep dive into the civil case surrounding the tragic death of Angels pitcher Tyler Skaggs. The panel breaks down the facts behind the case, the role of Angels communications director Eric Kay, the evidence that revealed a broader culture of drug access inside the organization, and the uphill battle of proving negligence against a Major League Baseball franchise. From third-party subpoenas and deleted text messages to emotional witness testimony and a jury question that changed the trajectory of the case, the guests walk through what it took to fight for accountability on behalf of Tyler's family. The conversation also touches on the Ken Paxton impeachment trial, the unique dynamics of a massive trial team, the personal responsibility defense, fentanyl in professional sports, and whether Major League Baseball has done enough to address the systemic issues exposed by the case. Main Highlights: The largest guest panel in Dirty Verdict history Laura Hollingsworth, Dana Levy, Leah Graham, and Daniel Dutko join the show Behind-the-scenes stories from the Ken Paxton impeachment trial The origin of the Tyler Skaggs civil case How Eric Kay's role with the Angels became central to the litigation Evidence that Kay was providing opioids to multiple players The challenge of proving the Angels knew, or should have known, what was happening Why the case was not simply about "personal responsibility" The significance of the criminal trial and Kay's 22-year sentence The difference between an intentional overdose and a fentanyl poisoning The role of the Angels' team doctor and the opioid prescriptions connected to Kay Discovery battles, deleted texts, and third-party subpoenas Camilla Kay's testimony and the evidence found through her phone The structure of the trial team and each lawyer's role The three-and-a-half-month trial in Orange County The jury question about punitive damages that shifted settlement pressure The emotional burden on Tyler Skaggs' family How the trial exposed deeper questions about drug use in professional sports MLB, the players union, and opioid testing after Tyler's death Whether the Angels and Major League Baseball have truly learned from the case

  • S4 ยท E15
    June 1 ยท 59 min

    S4 Eps 15: Trey Barton Interview

    In this episode of The Dirty Verdict, hosts Kyle Herbert, Peter Taaffe, and Bill Ogden sit down with trial attorney Trey Barton for a wide-ranging conversation about his path from teacher and coach to plaintiff's lawyer, opening his own firm right as COVID hit, and building a practice largely through attorney referrals. Trey walks through several recent verdicts, including a wrongful death/DWI case in Fayette County, a workplace foot-crush injury involving medical equipment, a commercial vehicle collision, and a bicycle injury case. Along the way, the group digs into trial strategy, jury selection, high-low agreements, damages arguments, corporate reps, deposition clips, and what makes a client's story connect with a jury Topics Discussed 00:00:15 โ€” Introduction to Trey Barton 00:02:05 โ€” Growing Up in La Grange, Texas 00:04:39 โ€” From A&M to Teaching and Coaching 00:06:53 โ€” Deciding to Go to Law School 00:08:05 โ€” Discovering Trial Work 00:08:24 โ€” Working Full-Time During Law School 00:09:32 โ€” Defense Work and Learning the Other Side 00:10:26 โ€” Opening His Own Firm in 2020 00:13:28 โ€” Starting a Firm During COVID 00:17:35 โ€” Building a Referral-Based Practice 00:21:04 โ€” Wrongful Death/DWI Case in Fayette County 00:23:06 โ€” Jury Selection in a Small Community 00:26:36 โ€” Talking About DWI, Damages, and Accountability 00:28:06 โ€” A $6.95 Million Verdict and Closure for the Family 00:32:52 โ€” Nurse's Foot-Crush Injury Case 00:36:13 โ€” Medical Testimony and Proving Nerve Damage 00:38:40 โ€” Trial Strategy with Witnesses and Liability 00:42:46 โ€” $4.49 Million Verdict Without Economic Damages 00:43:10 โ€” Per Diem Damages Arguments 00:45:19 โ€” High-Low Agreements and Waiver of Appeal 00:47:09 โ€” Commercial Vehicle Collision Case 00:48:27 โ€” TBI, Herniations, and a Subsequent Accident 00:50:53 โ€” Telling the Client's Story 00:52:03 โ€” Handling Preexisting Mental Anguish 00:53:10 โ€” Auto vs. Bicycle Injury Case 00:55:35 โ€” $500,000 Bicycle Case Verdict 00:56:04 โ€” Trey's Current Trial Docket 00:56:42 โ€” Keeping Trials Short and Focused 00:58:29 โ€” Final Thoughts and Contact Information

  • S4 ยท E14
    May 25 ยท 49 min

    S4 Eps 14: Charles and Erica Rose Sanders

    On this episode of The Dirty Verdict Podcast, hosts Peter Taaffe, Kyle Herbert, and Bill Ogden welcome back Erica Rose and Chuck Sanders of Rose Sanders Law Firm for a wide-ranging, hilarious, and surprisingly thoughtful conversation. The group catches up on Rose Sanders' expansion into California, the differences between handling injury cases across states, and the realities of building a multi-state law practice. From there, the conversation moves through Disney trips, law firm growth, AI in legal work, defamation cases involving major public figures, and the serious legal concerns around AI-generated explicit images involving minors. Erica also shares updates on her advocacy work, her family's connection to the entertainment industry, and her daughter's experience filming a Christmas movie in Los Angeles. The episode closes with reality TV talk, Houston's entertainment potential, hiring challenges in law firms, and the usual Dirty Verdict mix of legal insight, sarcasm, and unfiltered banter. 00:00 โ€“ Welcome Back Erica Rose and Chuck Sanders 00:55 โ€“ Rose Sanders Expands to California 03:19 โ€“ Splitting Time Between Texas and California 04:17 โ€“ Disney, Dole Whip, and Theme Park Strategy 08:27 โ€“ Future Office Locations and Lifestyle Markets 10:59 โ€“ Notable Case Updates and a Daycare Bus Crash Case 12:06 โ€“ Social Media, Legal Branding, and Content Creation 12:50 โ€“ Hurricane Beryl MDL, Sanctions, and Bad Legal Filings 14:09 โ€“ AI in Legal Work and ChatGPT Risks 15:20 โ€“ Defamation Law and Anti-SLAPP Cases 15:56 โ€“ Gavin Newsom, Fox News, and High-Profile Defamation Litigation 17:46 โ€“ Alex Jones, Infowars, and The Onion 19:36 โ€“ AI-Generated Explicit Images and Child Safety Concerns 21:15 โ€“ Big Tech Liability and Legal Accountability 23:21 โ€“ The Power and Danger of AI 25:28 โ€“ Reality TV, Lawyers, and Entertainment Opportunities 28:27 โ€“ Erica's Daughter Films a Christmas Movie 31:48 โ€“ Kids in Acting, Modeling, and Following Creative Passions 34:11 โ€“ Behind the Scenes of a Feature Film Production 36:24 โ€“ Red Carpets, Carmen Electra, and Reality TV Culture 40:02 โ€“ The Future of Reality TV 42:25 โ€“ Houston vs. L.A. Culture and Creative Risk-Taking 45:30 โ€“ Final Thoughts and Rose Sanders Contact Info

  • S4 ยท E13
    May 15 ยท 41 min

    S4 Eps 13: Judge Christine Weems Interverview

    *]:pointer-events-auto R6Vx5W_threadScrollVars scroll-mb-[calc(var(--scroll-root-safe-area-inset-bottom,0px)+var(--thread-response-height))] scroll-mt-[calc(var(--header-height)+min(200px,max(70px,20svh)))]" dir="auto" data-turn-id= "request-WEB:aaaaca19-63da-4272-90f6-1f4689d7c4a5-2" data-turn-id-container= "request-WEB:aaaaca19-63da-4272-90f6-1f4689d7c4a5-2" data-testid= "conversation-turn-6" data-scroll-anchor="false" data-turn= "assistant"> In this episode of The Dirty Verdict, hosts Peter Taaffe, Bill Ogden, and Kyle Herbert sit down with Judge Christine Weems of the 281st District Court in Harris County, Texas for a wide-ranging conversation about law, trial work, mock trial, theater, and the unexpected path that shaped her career. Judge Weems shares how she went from an English major at the University of Texas to South Texas College of Law, where mock trial helped her overcome a fear of public speaking and discover her love for advocacy. She talks about early trial experience, mass tort litigation, moving between Houston, Dallas, and New York, working document review while pursuing theater, and eventually returning to Texas to build a litigation career that led to the bench. The conversation also covers what motivated her to run for judge, the importance of trial experience on the bench, and her continued work in the arts through Cone Man Running Productions, including lawyer-cast theater productions that even offer CLE credit. Episode Highlights Judge Weems' unconventional path from English major to trial lawyer to district court judge How mock trial helped her overcome fear of public speaking and discover courtroom advocacy Early lessons from working as a law clerk and being handed real litigation responsibility The impact of tort reform on asbestos and silica litigation work in Texas Her time in New York pursuing acting, theater, and entertainment work while still practicing law Returning to Texas for Hurricane Ike litigation and rebuilding a trial-focused career Why trial experience matters for judges and how courtroom experience shaped her decision to run The story behind Cone Man Running Productions and its lawyer-led theater productions How legal professionals can participate in or attend theater productions while earning CLE credit Chapters / Major Topics 00:00 โ€” Introduction to Judge Christine Weems 01:43 โ€” College background, UT, English major, Spanish minor, and unusual classes 05:26 โ€” Discovering mock trial and meeting Brett Dressler 07:02 โ€” Growing up in Spring and the early pull toward law 07:57 โ€” How mock trial helped her overcome fear of public speaking 08:43 โ€” South Texas College of Law and early work with Robert Clark 09:22 โ€” Choosing litigation over transactional law 10:29 โ€” First jury verdict and early trial experience 11:12 โ€” Moving to Dallas after 9/11 and working in asbestos litigation 12:39 โ€” Missing the courtroom and returning to plaintiff-side trial work 14:08 โ€” Houston theater, acting, and finding a creative outlet outside law 15:12 โ€” Going to New York for acting conservatory 16:06 โ€” Tort reform, asbestos/silica litigation, and a shifting job market 18:51 โ€” Document review, theater work, and extra roles on 30 Rock and Law & Order 21:57 โ€” Meeting her husband, family life, and deciding where to practice law 22:36 โ€” Returning to Texas for Hurricane Ike litigation 23:30 โ€” Personal injury work, board certification, and trying cases 24:12 โ€” Judicial discretion, courtroom experience, and what sparked the idea of running 26:17 โ€” Why she decided to run for judge 26:48 โ€” The 2018 judicial race and life on the bench 29:51 โ€” Founding Cone Man Running Productions 31:07 โ€” Lawyer-cast theater productions and CLE credit 36:18 โ€” Promoting And Then There Were None at Spring Street Studios

  • S4 ยท E12
    May 11 ยท 59 min

    S4 Eps 12: Alice Lima Lovchik Interview

    In this episode of The Dirty Verdict Podcast, Peter Taaffe, Bill Ogden, and Kyle Herbert sit down with trial lawyer Alice Lima Lovchik for a wide-ranging conversation about law, trial work, immigration, civility, and heavy metal. Alice shares her story of moving from Brazil to Houston, rebuilding her legal career from the ground up, learning English, working her way from file clerk to paralegal, and eventually passing both the New York and Texas bar exams. She also talks about her work in personal injury, immigration law, and why she feels called to serve Houston's immigrant community through her trial practice. The conversation also gets into Alice's life outside the courtroom as a metal vocalist, her love for grindcore and thrash metal, and how her intense stage presence contrasts with the calm, measured way she handled a highly controversial trial incident involving opposing counsel. The hosts and Alice also discuss courtroom civility, trial nerves, lessons from losses, mentorship, and the kind of wisdom trial lawyers would give their younger selves. Major Topics Discussed: 00:00 โ€” Opening, host introductions, and Peter's son being drafted by the Miami Dolphins 02:19 โ€” Introducing Alice Lima Lovchik and her reputation as both a trial lawyer and metal vocalist 03:01 โ€” Thrash metal, death metal, grindcore, and Alice's former band Evocation 05:09 โ€” Alice's background in Brazil, moving to Houston, and meeting her husband at a rock show 07:49 โ€” Starting over in the U.S., learning English, and entering the legal field as a file clerk 09:42 โ€” Earning her LLM, passing the New York bar, and later passing the Texas bar 11:59 โ€” Alice's early legal career, working with Darrell Barger, and deciding insurance defense was not for her 14:03 โ€” Working with Javier Marcos, moving into immigration law, and later returning to personal injury 16:20 โ€” Marcos & Associates, trying cases frequently, and serving Houston's Hispanic and immigrant communities 18:43 โ€” How Alice evaluates cases, prepares for trial, and manages a large litigation docket 21:06 โ€” Trying 25 cases in 12 months and the rush of being in trial 23:12 โ€” Judges, livestreamed courtrooms, and how public clips can shape perceptions 28:46 โ€” The controversial trial incident involving opposing counsel taking a photo of Alice's notes 32:38 โ€” How Alice handled the incident, why she chose restraint, and what civility looks like under pressure 38:18 โ€” Maintaining professionalism with opposing counsel after serious conflict 43:13 โ€” Houston's metal scene, White Swan, and Alice's next musical chapter 45:32 โ€” Alice's book project collecting stories and lessons from trial lawyers 48:45 โ€” The hosts and Alice answer questions about their best moments as trial lawyers 54:42 โ€” Trial losses, humility, and advice for younger lawyers

  • S4 ยท E11
    May 1 ยท 1 hr 1 min

    S4 Eps 11: Dan Horowitz Interview

    In this episode of The Dirty Verdict, hosts Peter Taaffe, Kyle Herbert, and Bill Ogden sit down with trial lawyer and settlement planner Dan Horowitz for a conversation that starts with classic Dirty Verdict chaos and eventually lands on some genuinely valuable guidance for lawyers handling serious personal injury cases. Dan walks through his path from Bay City, Texas, to the University of Texas, South Texas College of Law, Abraham Watkins, and eventually opening his own firm. Along the way, the group covers law school networking, the realities of partnership points, going out on your own, and why relationships matter just as much as legal skill. The second half of the episode shifts into Dan's current work in settlement planning, structured settlements, trusts, tax-free growth, fee deferrals, and how lawyers can better protect clients after a major recovery. Dan explains why settlement planning should not be treated as an afterthought, especially in cases involving minors, catastrophic injuries, long-term care needs, or clients receiving life-changing sums of money. 00:00 โ€“ Introduction / Meet Dan Horowitz 01:20 โ€“ Growing Up in Bay City, Texas 02:20 โ€“ Getting Expelled Senior Year 05:30 โ€“ Getting Into UT and Coasting Through the End of High School 07:00 โ€“ Driving Buses at UT / Early Work Stories 13:20 โ€“ Studying Business at UT 15:10 โ€“ Law School Path 16:20 โ€“ Biggest Law School Regret: Not Networking More 22:10 โ€“ Dan's Professional Background and Recognition 23:20 โ€“ Early Legal Career and Firm Progression 25:45 โ€“ Becoming an Equity Partner 28:45 โ€“ Leaving to Start His Own Firm 31:25 โ€“ Transitioning Into Settlement Planning 33:00 โ€“ Getting His Insurance License 35:30 โ€“ Getting His Securities License 37:15 โ€“ Structured Settlements Explained 38:40 โ€“ Downsides of Structured Settlements 40:30 โ€“ Inflation Risk and Long-Term Planning 42:00 โ€“ Planning for Minors and Catastrophic Injury Cases 46:00 โ€“ When Lawyers Should Bring in a Settlement Planner 48:30 โ€“ Deferring Attorney Fees 51:00 โ€“ Structures as Protection From Bad Decisions or Pressure 52:40 โ€“ Customizing the Plan for Each Client

  • May 1 ยท 1 hr 10 min

    2026 Day of Civility

    The Dirty Verdict Hosts sit down with legendary lawyers, Dan Cogdell, Rusty Hardin and Erica Harris to discuss civility in the legal space.

  • S4 ยท E10
    April 17 ยท 1 hr 17 min

    S4 Eps 10: Robert Swafford on Voir Dire

    This week on The Dirty Verdict Podcast, Peter Taaffe, Kyle Herbert, and Bill Ogden sit down with renowned jury consultant Robert Swafford for a deep dive into the strategy behind jury selection, witness preparation, and trial storytelling. Robert explains how he helps lawyers maximize strikes for cause, sharpen voir dire, and prepare witnesses for high-stakes moments in court. The episode also explores Robert's work on major cases like the Alex Jones trial, his thoughts on why most lawyers misuse voir dire, and what separates effective trial prep from wasted effort. Along the way, the conversation mixes practical courtroom insight with memorable stories about legendary trial lawyers like Joe Jamail and Warren Burnett. Main topics discussed: 0:00 โ€“ Robert Swafford joins the show and explains his background as a jury consultant, along with the types of services he offers to trial lawyers. 5:00 โ€“ What jury consultants actually do, from writing voir dire scripts to courtroom coaching, witness prep, focus groups, and settlement videos. 13:00 โ€“ How to maximize strikes for cause and why jury selection is really about removing the worst jurors rather than finding the "perfect" panel. 25:00 โ€“ The language of voir dire, including why wording matters, how to ask better questions, and why most lawyers make it harder than it needs to be. 39:00 โ€“ Lessons from the Alex Jones trial, including written juror questionnaires, identifying problem jurors early, and navigating a highly charged panel. 47:00 โ€“ Legendary courtroom stories, featuring Joe Jamail and Warren Burnett, plus what those stories reveal about advocacy and jury work. 59:00 โ€“ Witness preparation in high-stakes cases, including Robert's work preparing Neil Heslin and Scarlett Lewis for powerful testimony in the Alex Jones case.

  • S4 ยท E9
    April 10 ยท 1 hr

    S4 Eps 9: John Zavitsanos and Monica Uddin of AZA

    On this episode of The Dirty Verdict, hosts Peter Taaffe and Bill Ogden sit down with powerhouse trial lawyers John Zavitsanos and Monica Uddin of AZA to talk about what makes Houston such a legendary trial-lawyer city, how elite trial teams are built, and why the best courtroom lawyers know how to find the human story in any case. The conversation covers everything from headline-making defamation matters and health care litigation to the future of Texas business courts and what young lawyers actually need to succeed in trial work. John shares his path from an immigrant upbringing to becoming one of Houston's most respected trial lawyers, along with his perspective on how Houston became a true legal proving ground for courtroom talent. Monica brings insight from the next generation of elite trial lawyers, including her work on high-profile matters and her candid thoughts on legal recruiting, mentorship, and why real trial experience still matters. The episode also dives into some of the biggest issues shaping modern litigation: the devastating speed of social-media-fueled defamation, the economics behind health care and insurance disputes, and whether Texas business courts are becoming a serious alternative for complex commercial cases. It is a smart, funny, wide-ranging conversation packed with war stories, strong opinions, and a behind-the-scenes look at how great trial lawyers think. Top highlights from the episode: 00:03:06 โ€“ John Zavitsanos on his background and why Houston became his destination John talks about growing up in an immigrant family, discovering trial law, and why Houston stood out as the place to learn from the best. 00:18:39 โ€“ Monica Uddin discusses the Mary Kate Cornett matter Monica breaks down how a viral online rumor spiraled across social media, the real-world toll it took, and the legal and reputational issues that followed. 00:29:02 โ€“ John on trying cases against major insurance interests A sharp discussion on health care litigation, emergency room reimbursement fights, and why some of those cases became especially personal and meaningful. 00:39:19 โ€“ Monica on the Drake/UMG dispute Monica explains AZA's Texas-side involvement in litigation tied to the Drake and Kendrick Lamar controversy. 00:44:21 โ€“ Texas business courts and what they could become John and Monica weigh in on how the new business courts are functioning, where they are succeeding, and what questions are still being worked out. 00:52:10 โ€“ What AZA looks for in young trial lawyers The conversation closes with a great discussion on training, courtroom reps, firm culture, and why they push young lawyers into real trial work early.

  • S4 ยท E8
    April 6 ยท 58 min

    S4 Eps 8: Dan Cogdell and Epic City

    In this wild and wide-ranging episode of Dirty Verdict, the hosts sit down with legendary criminal defense attorney Dan Cogdell for an unfiltered conversation that moves from legal commentary to cultural criticism and back again. Dan talks about the unexpected rise of his own podcast and social media presence, then dives into his sharp perspective on the steep decline in white collar prosecutions, shifting federal priorities, and what that means for defense work today. The conversation also explores Dan's representation of the EPIC Muslim community development in Plano, including the political backlash, lawsuits, and broader questions about religious liberty, fear-based politics, and how certain communities get turned into convenient political targets. Along the way, the episode detours into Enron, jury strategy, high-stakes litigation, the Harris County DA's office, and the changing business of lawโ€”making this one of the most candid, chaotic, and thought-provoking episodes yet. Major Topics Dan Cogdell's new podcast, social media growth, and why short-form content has taken off for him The dramatic slowdown in federal white collar prosecutions and shifting enforcement priorities Fraud investigations, immigration enforcement, and changes inside the U.S. Attorney's Office and FBI resources Dan's representation of the EPIC Muslim community in Plano and the political controversy surrounding it Islamophobia, media narratives, and the use of fear in modern politics Enron, Jeff Skilling, Andy Fastow, and Dan's firsthand stories from major white collar cases Harris County criminal justice, the DA's office, and Sean Teare's leadership compared to the prior administration Jury consulting, mock trials, AI-driven trial tools, and how litigation strategy is evolving Big verdicts, wrongful death litigation, and the differences between criminal and civil trial work The business of law, influence, branding, and how lawyers are adapting to media and public attention

  • S4 ยท E7
    March 23 ยท 59 min

    S4 Eps 7: Matt Greenberg and Mike Streich

    In this episode of The Dirty Verdict, Peter Taaffe and Kyle Herbert sit down with returning guests Matt Greenberg and Mike Streich to talk about launching their new firm and what it really looks like to build a modern plaintiff's practice from the ground up. From leaving a successful firm and betting on themselves, to handling overhead, referrals, office space, and admin headaches, Matt and Mike Streich share the honest realities of starting fresh in today's legal market. The conversation also dives into how lawyers are using LinkedIn as a real business development and networking tool, why it matters more than ever for younger lawyers, and how online engagement can actually lead to cases and meaningful professional relationships. Beyond firm ownership, the episode gets into bigger-picture issues in litigation, including deposition conduct, objection gamesmanship, confidentiality clauses in settlements, and why more transparency could help level the playing field for plaintiffs' lawyers. It's a smart, funny, and practical conversation about law practice, entrepreneurship, and the changing business of being a trial lawyer. Important Highlights Matt Greenberg and Mike Streich launch their new firm The guys discuss leaving their former firm, opening their own practice in late 2025, and what pushed them to make the leap. What it's really like to start a law firm in 2026 They break down the practical side of launching a firm today, including office space, software, legal research tools, admin work, and managing overhead. Why betting on yourself matters Matt and Mike talk about timing, building a bridge before making the jump, and why the fear of regret can be greater than the fear of failure. How LinkedIn is changing legal networking and referrals The episode explores how LinkedIn has become a real platform for lawyers to build relationships, share ideas, attract referrals, and even generate cases. Thought leadership and improving law practice culture They discuss using public conversations to challenge common frustrations in litigation and push for better practices across the profession. Deposition pet peeves and objection abuse Mike and Matt get into sloppy "non-responsive" objections, witness coaching, waiver issues, and the kinds of deposition tactics that frustrate trial lawyers. Confidentiality clauses in settlements The group talks about why confidentiality provisions often benefit defendants, when they should actually be negotiated, and why plaintiffs' lawyers should push back. Plaintiff resources and the Texas venue map Matt and Mike explain a resource they built for plaintiff lawyers to compare Texas venues and make more informed filing decisions.

  • S4 ยท E6
    March 9 ยท 57 min

    S4 Eps 6: Judge Mike Engelhart Interview

    In this episode of The Dirty Verdict, Peter Taaffe, Kyle Herbert, and Bill Ogden sit down with former Judge Mike Engelhart for a lively conversation that mixes courtroom insight, legal war stories, and a look at life on and off the bench. Judge Engelhart shares how he approached judging with patience, preparation, and practicality, while also reflecting on some of the memorable moments that defined his time in Harris County. The conversation touches on his path from New Jersey to Michigan to Houston, his legal beginnings working for John O'Quinn, and the decision to leave private practice for the bench. Judge Engelhart also opens up about losing his judicial primary, returning to private practice at Kherkher Garcia, and why he does not see another run for office in his future. Along the way, the episode delivers one of the most entertaining stories of the show: the famous case of Wilbur the Vietnamese pot-bellied pig, a homeowner's association dispute that turned into a viral courtroom moment. Add in practical advice for trial lawyers, thoughts on litigation funding, and reflections on how lawyers should carry themselves in court, and this episode delivers both substance and personality. Timestamps & Highlights 00:00 โ€“ Judge Mike Engelhart joins the show The hosts welcome former Judge Mike Engelhart and kick things off with humor and stories from lawyers who appeared in his courtroom. 00:01:42 โ€“ Favorite Judge Engelhart courtroom moments Peter, Kyle, and Bill share memorable examples of Judge Engelhart's patience, wit, and style from the bench. 00:04:06 โ€“ The Wilbur the pig story Judge Engelhart tells the now-legendary story of ruling that Wilbur, a Vietnamese pot-bellied pig, qualified as a pet and could stay in a neighborhood despite HOA objections. 00:11:07 โ€“ His background: Jersey, Michigan, and Houston Judge Engelhart talks about growing up in New Jersey, attending the University of Michigan, and eventually making Houston his long-term home. 00:15:27 โ€“ Spanish studies and studying abroad in Seville He shares how Spanish became a major part of his academic journey and led to a semester abroad in Spain. 00:19:48 โ€“ Why he chose the University of Houston Law Center Judge Engelhart explains why Houston was the right place to build a legal career and personal life. 00:20:38 โ€“ Family, marriage, and life in Houston He reflects on meeting his wife in law school, raising a family, and building a life in the city. 00:25:35 โ€“ Litigation funding and legal industry trends The group dives into a substantive discussion about disclosure of litigation funding and broader changes in the business of law. 00:29:04 โ€“ Early legal career and working for John O'Quinn Judge Engelhart discusses his first years in practice, learning procedure and evidence, and doing legal research the old-school way. 00:34:26 โ€“ Why he ran for judge He explains what drew him to the bench and how he navigated Harris County's political and legal landscape. 00:40:10 โ€“ Best and worst things lawyers can do in trial Judge Engelhart offers practical advice for lawyers on preparation, credibility, courtroom demeanor, and what turns judges off. 00:47:58 โ€“ Do judges really read the briefing? He gives a candid answer about how he prepared for hearings and what made written advocacy more effective. 00:48:40 โ€“ Leaving the bench and joining Kherkher Garcia Judge Engelhart talks about losing his 2024 primary, transitioning back into private practice, and what he enjoys about his current role. 00:50:07 โ€“ Will he ever run for office again? He shares why he believes that chapter is closed and what comes next professionally. 00:51:34 โ€“ The cases he's handling now From catastrophic injury matters to national litigation, Judge Engelhart describes the serious cases he is working on today.

  • S4 ยท E5
    February 26 ยท 55 min

    S4 Eps 5: Cordt Akers Interview

    Hosts Peter Taaffe, Kyle Herbert, and Bill Ogden sit down with Houston trial lawyer Cordt Akers, who lives at the intersection of criminal defense, white collar, and a bit of PIโ€”all while carrying one of the more unusual origin stories you'll hear on the show. Cordt walks through growing up in Houston, heading to Tulane (where Hurricane Katrina hit on his first day), and spending his early years as a working musicianโ€”until a brutal moment of "natural talent vs. hard work" forced a career pivot. That pivot led to South Texas College of Law, mock trial, and a fast, intense run through the Harris County DA's Office, where a terrifying in-flight emergency and an unexpected moment of humanity reshaped how he viewed prosecutionโ€”and ultimately why he left. From there, Cordt breaks down his path into the Dan Cogdell orbit, building a reputation in federal white collar, and what it's like to carry the emotional weight of trial workโ€”especially when the outcome is literally life-changing. He also shares two major acquittals from the year, including a high-emotion murder trial in San Jacinto County and a public corruption case that went sideways for the prosecution in the best way possible. Funny, serious, and very "Dirty Verdict"โ€”this one moves from My Little Pony headgear to murder trials to the reality of justice, ego, and what makes a great trial lawyer. Episode Highlights (with timestamps) 00:00:41 โ€“ 00:01:36 โ€” Christmas edition energy, jokes flying, and Bill's back in the studio 00:01:36 โ€“ 00:03:14 โ€” Meet Cordt Akers: criminal defense + some PI, and the "multiple practice areas" intro 00:03:14 โ€“ 00:06:16 โ€” The legend of Brock Akers (Cordt's dad): verdict history, reputation, and the TLA membership banter 00:06:16 โ€“ 00:11:08 โ€” Houston โ†’ Saint Michael's/Jesuit โ†’ Tulaneโ€ฆ and the jazz musician era (plus Katrina on day one) 00:11:08 โ€“ 00:12:46 โ€” South Texas Law: dreams of entertainment law die in Contracts I 00:12:46 โ€“ 00:15:29 โ€” Mock trial war stories: Golden Gate tandem bike terror + "they changed the rules after us" 00:15:29 โ€“ 00:18:02 โ€” The mock trial culture: training under pressure (and sometimes with a hangover) 00:18:02 โ€“ 00:20:06 โ€” DA's Office stint (about 20 months) + the brutal elevator moment with Rusty Hardin 00:20:06 โ€“ 00:22:23 โ€” Working for Dan Cogdell: mentorship, white collar exposure, and leveling up fast 00:22:23 โ€“ 00:27:14 โ€” The turning point: in-flight engine fire, a stranger's prayer, and Cordt's realization about prosecutorial impact 00:27:14 โ€“ 00:29:22 โ€” "How do you teach young prosecutors emotional intelligence?" + the ego vs. justice conflict 00:29:22 โ€“ 00:33:51 โ€” Leaving Dan's shop: taking the "take over the muffler repair center" option and building his own lane 00:36:01 โ€“ 00:37:08 โ€” Two major acquittals this year: murder case + public corruption case 00:37:08 โ€“ 00:41:53 โ€” San Jacinto County murder trial breakdown: alleged facts, accident defense, and the emotional verdict moment 00:42:10 โ€“ 00:44:12 โ€” The "weird" public corruption case: daring the State to call the defendant firstโ€ฆ and it backfiring on them 00:44:12 โ€“ 00:45:24 โ€” Why he usually doesn't talk to juries afterward (and a wild "we thought you were fake" jury comment) 00:47:44 โ€“ 00:50:34 โ€” Where the DA's office and federal prosecution are headed + why white collar cases feel like they're dwindling 00:52:16 โ€“ 00:55:30 โ€” Wrap-up: possible Father's Day episode with Brock, where to find Cordt (acresfirm.com), and final laughs

Showing 1โ€“20 of 22 episodes