Science and Spiritual Practices: what makes the difference?
Why is beauty so important to scientists, even those without religious convictions? And is that in some way connected to the failure of New Atheism, which began two decades ago this year? In this Sheldrake-Vernon Dialogue, Rupert Sheldrake and Mark Vernon consider how trials of spiritual practices suggest that the spiritual element makes a measurable difference, which in turn suggests ways to answers questions about beauty and the persistence of a sense that the universe is enchanted. Rupert’s two books on science and spiritual practices inform the conversation, as does research by Guy Hayward, Linda Woodhead, Simon Conway Morris, Micheal Levin and a team led by Fraser Watts. Why is providence such a powerful intuition? And might related matters have anything to do with the extraordinary power of Large Language Models? For more on the research considered: https://www.sheldrake.org/books-by-rupert-sheldrake/science-and-spiritual-practices https://www.markvernon.com/the-logos-in-the-data-centre-new-essay-at-my-substack-a-golden-string https://www.issr.org.uk/projects/the-science-of-religious-and-spiritual-exercises-sorse/ https://guyhayward.com/singing-is-neither-good-nor-bad-but-thinking-makes-it-so