Generative AI 101

Emily Laird

Welcome to Generative AI 101, your go-to podcast for learning the basics of generative artificial intelligence in easy-to-understand, bite-sized episodes. Join host Emily Laird, AI Integration Technologist and AI lecturer, to explore key concepts, applications, and ethical considerations, making AI accessible for everyone.

Play

Open in

38 episodes
Avg 11 min
English

Episodes 38

Newest Oldest Longest

All18 Unplayed18 In progress0 Played0

Counted on this page — what you have heard stays on this device, so it is not something the list can be paged by.

#323
August 11 · 9 min
1,350 Signatures and No Off Switch
In July 2026, an OpenAI model broke its sandbox, walked into Hugging Face's production infrastructure, and logged more than seventeen thousand actions before anyone outside the building knew. Twelve days later, 1,350 researchers from OpenAI, Anthropic, DeepMind, Meta, and Nvidia attached their real names and corporate emails to a letter called Pacing the Frontier. Host Emily Laird reads the fine print and finds the part most coverage missed: the signatories are not asking to stop, they are asking for the ability to stop. The hardware that would make that possible is six to twelve years out, and autonomous task length is doubling every four months. 🎯 JOIN THE AI WEEKLY MEETUPS https://www.uwstout.edu/ai-weekly-meetup 📩 EMAIL REMINDERS FOR THE MEETUPS https://app.e2ma.net/app2/audience/signup/2101263/1779703/ 💬 CONNECT WITH EMILY LAIRD ON LINKEDIN http://www.linkedin.com/in/meet-emily-laird
#322
August 10 · 12 min
Inside the Rogue AI Agent Incidents
In July, an AI agent worked its way into Hugging Face's infrastructure, went from a single worker pod to cluster admin in under thirteen hours, and did all of it to copy a benchmark's answer key. Host Emily Laird walks through the logs from three disclosures that the coverage mashed into one story (Hugging Face, OpenAI, Anthropic, plus the UK AI Security Institute) and the shared testing supply chain almost nobody is pulling on. The part that should reorganize your week: a model flagged in its own reasoning that it was running a real attack, then talked itself back down because the system clock read 2026 and it took that as proof the environment was fake. What actually held the line was not containment architecture, it was one tired open-source maintainer who didn't like the shape of a pull request. 🎯 JOIN THE AI WEEKLY MEETUPS https://www.uwstout.edu/ai-weekly-meetup 📩 EMAIL REMINDERS FOR THE MEETUPS https://app.e2ma.net/app2/audience/signup/2101263/1779703/ 💬 CONNECT WITH EMILY LAIRD ON LINKEDIN http://www.linkedin.com/in/meet-emily-laird
#321
August 6 · 13 min
Use Case Thursday: Should You Host Your Own AI Model?
Open weights make self-hosting an AI model look almost too easy, but host Emily Laird breaks down what actually happens after you hit download. This episode walks through the infrastructure, staffing, security and compliance costs that separate a slick demo from a real institutional service, including GPU power draws, KV cache limits and FERPA obligations. It's a reality check on when owning your own model actually saves money, and when it just means insourcing a cloud provider without the cloud provider's scale. If you've ever heard someone ask "why are we paying Microsoft," this episode answers it. 🎯 JOIN THE AI WEEKLY MEETUPS https://www.uwstout.edu/ai-weekly-meetup 📩 EMAIL REMINDERS FOR THE MEETUPS https://app.e2ma.net/app2/audience/signup/2101263/1779703/ 💬 CONNECT WITH EMILY LAIRD ON LINKEDIN http://www.linkedin.com/in/meet-emily-laird
#320
August 5 · 9 min
Open Weights Is Not Open Source
An analyst went through sixty-eight AI models and found that exactly zero of the downloadable ones qualify as open source. In this episode, host Emily Laird explains what open weights actually gets you (the house, not the blueprints) and why the training data you never see is the only part that matters. She also walks through Jensen Huang's first post on X, the distillation argument buried inside it, and the EU AI Act exemption that vanishes right when a model gets capable enough to be worth using. If you have told your board you are running open source AI, consider this a correction. 🎯 JOIN THE AI WEEKLY MEETUPS https://www.uwstout.edu/ai-weekly-meetup 📩 EMAIL REMINDERS FOR THE MEETUPS https://app.e2ma.net/app2/audience/signup/2101263/1779703/ 💬 CONNECT WITH EMILY LAIRD ON LINKEDIN http://www.linkedin.com/in/meet-emily-laird
#319
August 4 · 14 min
What is Model Distillation?
Elon Musk said under oath that xAI partly distills OpenAI's models, and the courtroom gasped. Host Emily Laird takes apart what model distillation actually is, why hiding chain of thought was never a real defense (fabricated reasoning traces deliver roughly 96.7 percent of the value of genuine internal access), and what 24,000 fraudulent accounts look like when no vulnerability was exploited and the product worked exactly as designed. The uncomfortable part is structural: every dollar spent making a model cleaner and safer makes it a better teacher for whoever is copying it. Capability transfers through distillation, safety does not, and nobody has ever un-released 2.8 trillion parameters. 🎯 JOIN THE AI WEEKLY MEETUPS https://www.uwstout.edu/ai-weekly-meetup 📩 EMAIL REMINDERS FOR THE MEETUPS https://app.e2ma.net/app2/audience/signup/2101263/1779703/ 💬 CONNECT WITH EMILY LAIRD ON LINKEDIN http://www.linkedin.com/in/meet-emily-laird
#318
August 3 · 9 min
Ethan Mollick Has Spoken
Ethan Mollick’s Summer 2026 AI guide makes one thing clear: the biggest shift is no longer model intelligence, it is what AI agents can do once you give them access to your computer, inbox, and files. Host Emily Laird breaks down Mollick’s recommendations for ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Copilot, including the moment ChatGPT sent an email he expected it to draft. The real issue is prompt injection, forgotten permissions, and the uncomfortable fact that an AI can behave exactly as authorized while still doing something you did not expect. As agents become more reliable, the risk is moving from hallucination to control. 🎯 JOIN THE AI WEEKLY MEETUPS https://www.uwstout.edu/ai-weekly-meetup 📩 EMAIL REMINDERS FOR THE MEETUPS https://app.e2ma.net/app2/audience/signup/2101263/1779703/ 💬 CONNECT WITH EMILY LAIRD ON LINKEDIN http://www.linkedin.com/in/meet-emily-laird
#317
July 30 · 13 min
Open Weights and American AI Leadership
Jensen Huang had an X account for years and never used it, then spent his first post on a three-page policy PDF that fifty companies have now signed. Host Emily Laird reads past the principle and into the machinery, including the one paragraph about distillation that a staffer will read aloud in a hearing room two years from now. You will also get the part the letter does not survive: free weights, expensive inference, a minimum production team that runs half a million a year, and an open ecosystem Washington would be protecting that is already substantially Chinese. Bring skepticism for the numbers, because almost none of them have been independently audited. 🎯 JOIN THE AI WEEKLY MEETUPS https://www.uwstout.edu/ai-weekly-meetup 📩 EMAIL REMINDERS FOR THE MEETUPS https://app.e2ma.net/app2/audience/signup/2101263/1779703/ 💬 CONNECT WITH EMILY LAIRD ON LINKEDIN http://www.linkedin.com/in/meet-emily-laird
#316
July 29 · 13 min
Claude Opus 5
Anthropic shipped Claude Opus 5 on July 24th at the same price as the model it replaces, and buried the interesting part in a footnote: turn the effort dial to max and the scores go down. Host Emily Laird reads the system card, separates the vendor-run benchmarks from the independently administered ones, and explains why extra test-time compute buys ambition rather than correctness. Also covered: three outages in two days, a cyber classifier that quietly routes part of your traffic to an older model, and why Anthropic's own coding guidance stops one rung short of the top setting. If your team is paying for maximum thinking, you may be paying for scope creep with a token bill attached. 🎯 JOIN THE AI WEEKLY MEETUPS https://www.uwstout.edu/ai-weekly-meetup 📩 EMAIL REMINDERS FOR THE MEETUPS https://app.e2ma.net/app2/audience/signup/2101263/1779703/ 💬 CONNECT WITH EMILY LAIRD ON LINKEDIN http://www.linkedin.com/in/meet-emily-laird
#315
July 28 · 10 min
Your AI Notetaker Never Asked
One in three American workers has sat in a meeting with an AI notetaker, and most of them were never asked first. Host Emily Laird traces the path from a leaked Otter transcript that killed a venture deal to a consolidated privacy suit in San Jose, where every named plaintiff was a non-customer who simply showed up to someone else's call. The twist: the awkward bot in your participant list was the warning label, and the fastest-growing corner of this market sells its removal as a feature. Bring three questions and nine seconds of nerve. 🎯 JOIN THE AI WEEKLY MEETUPS https://www.uwstout.edu/ai-weekly-meetup 📩 EMAIL REMINDERS FOR THE MEETUPS https://app.e2ma.net/app2/audience/signup/2101263/1779703/ 💬 CONNECT WITH EMILY LAIRD ON LINKEDIN http://www.linkedin.com/in/meet-emily-laird
#314
July 27 · 10 min
The Rework Tax: What AI Productivity Actually Costs
AI did not save you time, it moved the bill to someone else's desk. In this episode, host Emily Laird opens the ledger on the rework tax: the workslop arriving in inboxes that looks finished but is not, the 37 percent of "saved" hours burned on corrections and clarifications, and the jagged frontier that makes wrong output read exactly like right output. She walks through the METR trial where experienced developers came out 19 percent slower and still believed they were 20 percent faster. The reality check: the colleague quietly rebuilding your draft at eleven at night is never going to tell you about it. 🎯 JOIN THE AI WEEKLY MEETUPS https://www.uwstout.edu/ai-weekly-meetup 📩 EMAIL REMINDERS FOR THE MEETUPS https://app.e2ma.net/app2/audience/signup/2101263/1779703/ 💬 CONNECT WITH EMILY LAIRD ON LINKEDIN http://www.linkedin.com/in/meet-emily-laird
#313
July 22 · 8 min
Kimi K3: Open Weights, Locked Door
Moonshot AI just gave away the largest open-weight model ever built, and the chip stocks still bled. Host Emily Laird breaks down Kimi K3: 2.8 trillion parameters, free to download, and completely impossible for you to actually run. The catch isn't the price of the model. It's who owns the machines that serve it. 🎯 JOIN THE AI WEEKLY MEETUPS https://www.uwstout.edu/ai-weekly-meetup 📩 EMAIL REMINDERS FOR THE MEETUPS https://app.e2ma.net/app2/audience/signup/2101263/1779703/ 💬 CONNECT WITH EMILY LAIRD ON LINKEDIN http://www.linkedin.com/in/meet-emily-laird
#312
July 21 · 9 min
GPT 5.6: The Model That Needed A Permission Slip
OpenAI just shipped GPT-5.6 and ChatGPT Work, but the ship date was set by a phone call from the Commerce Department. Host Emily Laird breaks down the three-model pricing play, the office agent that is secretly a coding agent, and the efficiency pitch that contradicts its own premium feature. Then the real story: a "voluntary" government review that decided when America's most famous software product could launch, and what that precedent means for anyone building on a single frontier model. The framework behind it still doesn't exist, and that should bother you. 🎯 JOIN THE AI WEEKLY MEETUPS https://www.uwstout.edu/ai-weekly-meetup 📩 EMAIL REMINDERS FOR THE MEETUPS https://app.e2ma.net/app2/audience/signup/2101263/1779703/ 💬 CONNECT WITH EMILY LAIRD ON LINKEDIN http://www.linkedin.com/in/meet-emily-laird
#311
July 20 · 10 min
Use Case Monday
Using AI is rarely the scandal. Hiding it is. Host Emily Laird examines academic misconduct, workplace secrecy, and Meta’s Project Cannes to show why documentation without disclosure can become evidence against you. This episode offers a practical four-step system for creating an AI paper trail that protects your work instead of exposing it. 🎯 JOIN THE AI WEEKLY MEETUPS https://www.uwstout.edu/ai-weekly-meetup 📩 EMAIL REMINDERS FOR THE MEETUPS https://app.e2ma.net/app2/audience/signup/2101263/1779703/ 💬 CONNECT WITH EMILY LAIRD ON LINKEDIN http://www.linkedin.com/in/meet-emily-laird
#310
July 15 · 9 min
96 vs. 48: The Brown University AI Cheating Scandal
A take-home midterm at Brown University averaged 96, then the same students averaged 48 on the in-person final, and that gap tells the whole story. Host Emily Laird walks through how economist Roberto Serrano, a professional game theorist, caught roughly fifty suspected AI cheaters without detection software: he simply designed a test the fakes could not afford to sit. This episode covers the statistical fingerprint of unedited ChatGPT proofs, the students who confessed by dropping the course, and why a room full of desks outperformed the entire AI-detection industry. If you evaluate people for a living, Serrano just handed you the template. 🎯 JOIN THE AI WEEKLY MEETUPS https://www.uwstout.edu/ai-weekly-meetup 📩 EMAIL REMINDERS FOR THE MEETUPS https://app.e2ma.net/app2/audience/signup/2101263/1779703/ 💬 CONNECT WITH EMILY LAIRD ON LINKEDIN http://www.linkedin.com/in/meet-emily-laird
#309
July 14 · 8 min
Apple v. OpenAI
Apple just sued OpenAI for trade secret theft, and the complaint reads less like a spy novel and more like a group chat with subpoena power. Host Emily Laird walks through the two former Apple employees at the center of the case: the engineer who allegedly kept his company laptop and downloaded a thousand pages of schematics, and the executive accused of asking job candidates to bring actual Apple parts to interviews. Along the way, she breaks down the one legal doctrine that explains why hiring 400 former Apple employees is perfectly legal but keeping the offboarding document is not. Seven minutes, zero hype, and a reality check on what happens when the AI hardware race runs straight through Cupertino's supply chain. 🎯 JOIN THE AI WEEKLY MEETUPS https://www.uwstout.edu/ai-weekly-meetup 📩 EMAIL REMINDERS FOR THE MEETUPS https://app.e2ma.net/app2/audience/signup/2101263/1779703/ 💬 CONNECT WITH EMILY LAIRD ON LINKEDIN http://www.linkedin.com/in/meet-emily-laird
#308
July 13 · 7 min
Meta's Fake Teen Factory
Meta paid contractors to pose as children, flood rival chatbots with prompts about suicide, eating disorders, and abuse, then log every response in spreadsheets. The company calls it "industry-standard safety benchmarking," but the operation had no consent, no disclosure, and no shared findings: the four things that make red teaming legitimate. Host Emily Laird walks through the Wired investigation, the 45,000-prompt testing rounds, and the court testimony showing what Meta knew about its own failure rates while it was busy documenting everyone else's. This is the difference between a shield and a sword, and the paperwork says sword.──────────── 🎯 JOIN THE AI WEEKLY MEETUPS https://www.uwstout.edu/ai-weekly-meetup 📩 EMAIL REMINDERS FOR THE MEETUPS https://app.e2ma.net/app2/audience/signup/2101263/1779703/ 💬 CONNECT WITH EMILY LAIRD ON LINKEDIN http://www.linkedin.com/in/meet-emily-laird
#307
July 9 · 10 min
Use Case Thursday: Make AI Disagree with You
Host Emily Laird breaks down why chatbots so often agree with your worst instincts, then shows how a pre-mortem prompt turns that people-pleasing machinery against your plan. The stakes are practical: job offers, house purchases, program launches, hard conversations, and every other moment when agreement feels comforting but costs you later. This episode is a reality check on AI sycophancy, decision stress-testing, and the simple question that can make a yes-machine finally tell you what might fail.────────────── 🎯 JOIN THE AI WEEKLY MEETUPS https://www.uwstout.edu/ai-weekly-meetup 📩 EMAIL REMINDERS FOR THE MEETUPS https://app.e2ma.net/app2/audience/signup/2101263/1779703/ 💬 CONNECT WITH EMILY LAIRD ON LINKEDIN
#306
July 8 · 8 min
Microsoft's 4,800 Layoffs
Microsoft cut 4,800 jobs, and the savings cover roughly two days of its AI infrastructure spending. Host Emily Laird runs the arithmetic the press release skipped: a $190 billion capex bill, an Xbox division losing 64 cents on every dollar, and a $625 billion backlog where nearly half the money traces back to one cash-burning customer. This is the story of a company growing 18 percent while shedding a trillion dollars in market value. The layoffs were never a savings plan, they were a message. ────────────────── 📑READ DEAN BALL'S ESSAY https://www.hyperdimensional.co/p/what-should-be-done 🎯 JOIN THE AI WEEKLY MEETUPS https://www.uwstout.edu/ai-weekly-meetup 📩 EMAIL REMINDERS FOR THE MEETUPS https://app.e2ma.net/app2/audience/signup/2101263/1779703/ 💬 CONNECT WITH EMILY LAIRD ON LINKEDIN http://www.linkedin.com/in/meet-emily-laird ────────────────── You now know more about Microsoft's recent layoffs than you did before you arrived.

Showing 21–38 of 38 episodes