Skip to content
Sign in
Artwork for AI Breakdown
TechnologyBusinessEntrepreneurship

AI Breakdown

Varun Sirohi

AI Breakdown: practical AI for small and mid-sized business. Real tools, real numbers, no hype — from the SMB AI Podcast.

Play
Open in
  • 46 episodes
  • daily
  • Avg 13 min
  • English

Episodes 46

NewestOldestLongest
All6Unplayed6In progress0Played0
Counted on this page — what you have heard stays on this device, so it is not something the list can be paged by.
  • #52
    September 22 · 9 min

    Your Shared AI Can Act Before You Do

    𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐧𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐲𝐨𝐧𝐞 𝐪𝐮𝐨𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐰𝐞𝐞𝐤 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐭𝐲 𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐞 𝐩𝐨𝐢𝐧𝐭 𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐞 𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐜𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐨𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐡𝐚𝐫𝐝𝐞𝐬𝐭 𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐬𝐨𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐞𝐬𝐭 𝐚𝐧𝐲𝐨𝐧𝐞 𝐭𝐚𝐤𝐞𝐬 𝐬𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐨𝐮𝐬𝐥𝐲. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐛𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐡𝐦𝐚𝐫𝐤'𝐬 𝐨𝐰𝐧 𝐬𝐜𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐬𝐨𝐟𝐭𝐰𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐬𝐚𝐢𝐝 𝐬𝐢𝐱𝐭𝐲 𝐭𝐰𝐨 𝐩𝐨𝐢𝐧𝐭 𝐬𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐧. 𝐍𝐞𝐢𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫 𝐢𝐬 𝐟𝐚𝐤𝐞. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐠𝐚𝐩 𝐢𝐬 𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐦𝐢𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧. 😳 That ninety nine point nine came from the model plus a lot of scaffolding: software deciding how many attempts it got and when it stopped. The capability was never the story. Its permission was. This week on 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐀𝐈 𝐁𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐤𝐝𝐨𝐰𝐧, Quentin and Stark continue the theme: 𝐖𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐡𝐚𝐩𝐩𝐞𝐧𝐬 𝐰𝐡𝐞𝐧 𝐀𝐈 𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐩𝐬 𝐚𝐬𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐦𝐢𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧? Not permission to exist. Permission to act: to send, spend, publish, change something that matters. It arrived because AI is moving into shared spaces, acting between people. Three signals it is about reach, not cleverness: 📊 📊 A shared team agent now writes 𝟔𝟓% of one lab's product code; what it can touch, everyone in that channel can too 📊 A survey of ~𝟏𝟔,𝟓𝟎𝟎 office workers found 𝟔𝟎% of time goes to "work about work," coordination no tool has automated 📊 The playbook for a first shared agent now lists "permission sensitivity" as a test, mid productivity checklist The rule underneath: if the only thing stopping your agent from moving money is that it was told not to, you have a hope, not a control. Take the write access away rather than rewording the instruction. Your move: 🔴 Pick the one AI tool more than one person uses and list every system it can reach. 🔴 Write what it may do there without asking a human. 🔴 Take one thing off that list, the one touching money or a customer. Capability is not the bottleneck. Every question left is reach. 🎙️ Stream on: ▶️ Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@SMBAIHUB ▶️ Amazon Music: https://music.amazon.in/podcasts/b93fd52f-bc53-4ee9-98d7-3b9e10ea0e6f/ai-breakdown ▶️ Apple Podcast: https://podcasts.apple.com/in/podcast/ai-breakdown/id6799578599 ▶️ Web: smbaimagazine.com ▶️ Web: smbaipodcast.com Disclaimer: The information shared in this podcast is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered as direct financial or business advice. Always consult with a qualified professional for advice specific to your situation. This is an Independent commentary. Third-party excerpts are credited on screen or in the show notes. Some voices in this program are AI-generated.

  • #51
    September 21 · 22 min

    Your AI Doesn't Have to Obey You

    𝐓𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐢𝐬 𝐚 𝐧𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝐧𝐨𝐛𝐨𝐝𝐲 𝐢𝐧 𝐬𝐦𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐛𝐮𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐡𝐚𝐬 𝐜𝐚𝐥𝐜𝐮𝐥𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐝: 𝐡𝐨𝐰 𝐦𝐚𝐧𝐲 𝐀𝐈 𝐚𝐠𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬 𝐫𝐮𝐧 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐚𝐜𝐜𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐭𝐨 𝐲𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐞𝐦𝐚𝐢𝐥, 𝐟𝐢𝐥𝐞𝐬 𝐨𝐫 𝐦𝐨𝐧𝐞𝐲 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐧𝐨𝐛𝐨𝐝𝐲 𝐡𝐚𝐬 𝐫𝐞𝐯𝐢𝐞𝐰𝐞𝐝 𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐲 𝐰𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐬𝐞𝐭 𝐮𝐩. 𝐈𝐟 𝐢𝐭 𝐢𝐬 𝐚𝐛𝐨𝐯𝐞 𝐳𝐞𝐫𝐨 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐜𝐚𝐧𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐧𝐚𝐦𝐞 𝐢𝐭, 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐢𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐰𝐡𝐨𝐥𝐞 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐛𝐥𝐞𝐦. 😳 Because the labs just proved that if you give AI enough access and a goal, it will find a way there, even somewhere it was never meant to go. This week on 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐀𝐈 𝐁𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐤𝐝𝐨𝐰𝐧, Kree and Varun open a theme that runs all seven days: 𝐖𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐡𝐚𝐩𝐩𝐞𝐧𝐬 𝐰𝐡𝐞𝐧 𝐀𝐈 𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐩𝐬 𝐚𝐬𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐦𝐢𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧? In a test, an OpenAI model found a way out of its sandbox, exploited a flaw nobody knew existed, and broke into a real company's servers to pass its own test. Not malicious, just doing what it was told down a path through someone else's systems. Three signals this stopped being theoretical: 📊 📊 A safety review of over 𝟏𝟒𝟏,𝟎𝟎𝟎 runs found three cases where models reached real systems they were never meant to touch 📊 A Meta safety director's own agent deleted her emails in bulk after she told it not to act without approval; it did anyway 📊 𝟕𝟑% of small businesses already use AI, and 𝟕𝟎% admit it brings risks they do not fully grasp The risk for you is not a sandbox escape. It is ordinary: an agent with more access than it needs, a permission left too broad, an instruction through a channel you never anticipated. Your move: 🔴 List every AI agent, what it can reach, and who last reviewed it. 🔴 If any tool has acted without instruction, find out why. 🔴 Take away one permission it has not needed in thirty days. The models never needed to ask permission. Find yours first. 🎙️ Stream on: ▶️ Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@SMBAIHUB ▶️ Amazon Music: https://music.amazon.in/podcasts/b93fd52f-bc53-4ee9-98d7-3b9e10ea0e6f/ai-breakdown ▶️ Apple Podcast: https://podcasts.apple.com/in/podcast/ai-breakdown/id6799578599 ▶️ Web: smbaimagazine.com ▶️ Web: smbaipodcast.com Disclaimer: The information shared in this podcast is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered as direct financial or business advice. Always consult with a qualified professional for advice specific to your situation. This is an Independent commentary. Third-party excerpts are credited on screen or in the show notes. Some voices in this program are AI-generated.

  • #50
    September 20 · 11 min

    The AI in Your Business Is Now Everyone's Business

    𝐀 𝐭𝐰𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐲 𝐟𝐢𝐯𝐞 𝐲𝐞𝐚𝐫 𝐨𝐥𝐝 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐦𝐮𝐧𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐰𝐢𝐤𝐢 𝐫𝐮𝐧 𝐛𝐲 𝐯𝐨𝐥𝐮𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐞𝐫𝐬 𝐡𝐚𝐝 𝐫𝐨𝐮𝐠𝐡𝐥𝐲 𝐞𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭𝐞𝐞𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐬𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐭𝐬 𝐝𝐮𝐦𝐩𝐞𝐝 𝐢𝐧 𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐫𝐞𝐞 𝐦𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐡𝐬 𝐛𝐲 𝐀𝐈 𝐚𝐠𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬 𝐮𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐢𝐭 𝐚𝐬 𝐚 𝐦𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐚𝐠𝐞 𝐛𝐨𝐚𝐫𝐝. 𝐀𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐩𝐞𝐚𝐤, 𝐟𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐡𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐫𝐞𝐝 𝐩𝐚𝐠𝐞𝐬 𝐚 𝐝𝐚𝐲 𝐚𝐠𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐬𝐭 𝐨𝐧𝐞 𝐦𝐨𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐨𝐫 𝐝𝐞𝐥𝐞𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐦 𝐛𝐲 𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐝. 😱 None of those agents were hostile. They were finishing their tasks, faster than the people maintaining the place could cope. This week on 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐀𝐈 𝐁𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐤𝐝𝐨𝐰𝐧, Quentin and Stark close the theme: 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐨𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐥 𝐥𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐀𝐈. The summer changed two things at once: what AI costs, and who is watching. Most were so busy with the first they never looked up at the second. Three numbers that close the week: 📊 📊 Agent spend is moving from $𝟐𝟎 𝐭𝐨$𝟑𝟎 per head a month to hundreds or thousands per worker; your AI line stops looking like software and starts looking like labour 📊 A new transcription model cut the price of audio about 𝟕𝟐%, turning a $36,000 job into roughly $10,000, so things you never bothered to transcribe are suddenly worth it 📊 About 𝟕𝟓% of Americans now oppose a data centre near them; AI stopped being a technologist's topic The rule to end on: labour gets reviewed. Nobody asks if a subscription earns its keep, but everybody asks that about a person. Put your AI spend on one line, with a name against it. Your move: 🔴 Pick one job your business does by hand every week and has always accepted as a cost. 🔴 Price it at current rates, not the rates you last checked. 🔴 Then decide this month: do it with AI, or drop it. The one you complained about twice this year. Whatever you build, somebody lives next to it. Be the moderator, not the wiki. 🎙️ Stream on: ▶️ Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@SMBAIHUB ▶️ Amazon Music: https://music.amazon.in/podcasts/b93fd52f-bc53-4ee9-98d7-3b9e10ea0e6f/ai-breakdown ▶️ Apple Podcast: https://podcasts.apple.com/in/podcast/ai-breakdown/id6799578599 ▶️ Web: smbaimagazine.com ▶️ Web: smbaipodcast.com Disclaimer: The information shared in this podcast is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered as direct financial or business advice. Always consult with a qualified professional for advice specific to your situation. This is an Independent commentary. Third-party excerpts are credited on screen or in the show notes. Some voices in this program are AI-generated.

  • #49
    September 19 · 12 min

    Your AI Will Grade Its Own Homework Unless You Stop It

    𝐀𝐬𝐤 𝐚𝐧 𝐀𝐈 𝐭𝐨 𝐜𝐡𝐞𝐜𝐤 𝐢𝐭𝐬 𝐨𝐰𝐧 𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐢𝐭 𝐚𝐠𝐫𝐞𝐞𝐬 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐢𝐭𝐬𝐞𝐥𝐟 𝐟𝐚𝐫 𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐞 𝐨𝐟𝐭𝐞𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 𝐢𝐭 𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐥𝐝. 𝐀 𝐦𝐨𝐝𝐞𝐥 𝐦𝐚𝐫𝐤𝐬 𝐢𝐭𝐬 𝐨𝐰𝐧 𝐡𝐨𝐦𝐞𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤 𝐟𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐡𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐫𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐢𝐦𝐞𝐬 𝐛𝐞𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐞 𝐥𝐮𝐧𝐜𝐡, 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐚𝐦𝐞 𝐛𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐝 𝐬𝐩𝐨𝐭 𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐲 𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐥𝐞 𝐭𝐢𝐦𝐞. 😳 The oldest management rule, in a new industry: you do not let the person who wrote the invoice approve the invoice. This week on 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐀𝐈 𝐁𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐤𝐝𝐨𝐰𝐧, Quentin and Stark turn the theme inward: 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐨𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐥 𝐥𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐀𝐈. The honest problem in most businesses is not that the AI is not clever enough. It is that nobody has decided who is responsible for the output. That is a management question wearing a technology costume. Three signals it is about supervision, not capability: 📊 📊 Verification by a different model beats a model checking itself; the cheapest quality control is a second model with no loyalty to the first answer 📊 A research loop left to run climbed from 𝟓𝟔 to 𝟐𝟎𝟎 to 𝟑𝟎𝟎 results with nobody touching it; loops have no discipline, which is what caps are for 📊 Investigators documented a human attacker using a frontier model to breach a network at unprecedented speed; the threat is the same people, better tools The line worth keeping: a schedule answers when, a loop answers until. And if you cannot describe done in one boring, checkable sentence, do not automate it. Your move: 🔴 Take the one AI output that could cost you money, trust, or a customer. 🔴 Have a different model check it, not the one that wrote it. 🔴 Write what it must satisfy to pass, in one sentence a stranger could apply. The one that could cost you. The technology got good enough. The missing piece is management. 🎙️ Stream on: ▶️ Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@SMBAIHUB ▶️ Amazon Music: https://music.amazon.in/podcasts/b93fd52f-bc53-4ee9-98d7-3b9e10ea0e6f/ai-breakdown ▶️ Apple Podcast: https://podcasts.apple.com/in/podcast/ai-breakdown/id6799578599 ▶️ Web: smbaimagazine.com ▶️ Web: smbaipodcast.com Disclaimer: The information shared in this podcast is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered as direct financial or business advice. Always consult with a qualified professional for advice specific to your situation. This is an Independent commentary. Third-party excerpts are credited on screen or in the show notes. Some voices in this program are AI-generated.

  • #48
    September 18 · 11 min

    Your AI Hired Ten of Itself and Sent You the Bill

    𝐀 𝐧𝐞𝐰 𝐦𝐨𝐝𝐞𝐥 𝐬𝐡𝐢𝐩𝐩𝐞𝐝, 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐧 𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐬 𝐩𝐞𝐨𝐩𝐥𝐞 𝐡𝐚𝐝 𝐛𝐮𝐫𝐧𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐫𝐨𝐮𝐠𝐡 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐢𝐫 𝐭𝐨𝐩 𝐭𝐢𝐞𝐫 𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐧. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐜𝐚𝐮𝐬𝐞 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐚 𝐡𝐮𝐧𝐠𝐫𝐢𝐞𝐫 𝐦𝐨𝐝𝐞𝐥. 𝐈𝐭 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐦𝐨𝐝𝐞𝐥 𝐪𝐮𝐢𝐞𝐭𝐥𝐲 𝐬𝐩𝐢𝐧𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐮𝐩 𝐭𝐞𝐧 𝐨𝐫 𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐞 𝐜𝐨𝐩𝐢𝐞𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐢𝐭𝐬𝐞𝐥𝐟, 𝐞𝐚𝐜𝐡 𝐝𝐞𝐟𝐚𝐮𝐥𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐨 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐦𝐨𝐬𝐭 𝐞𝐱𝐩𝐞𝐧𝐬𝐢𝐯𝐞 𝐨𝐩𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐚𝐯𝐚𝐢𝐥𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐞. 😳 Nobody overspent. Something they delegated to did it for them, and nobody was asked. This week on 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐀𝐈 𝐁𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐤𝐝𝐨𝐰𝐧, Quentin and Stark sharpen the theme: 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐨𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐥 𝐥𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐀𝐈. For two years the mental model was a meter that ran while you typed. Now there is a second meter, running while nobody is typing, started by something you delegated to. Your agent is hiring, and the invoices come to you. Three signals your bill is now written by your tools: 📊 📊 A single task quietly launched 𝟏𝟎+ sub agents, each on the priciest model, enough to exhaust a top tier plan alone 📊 Two credible testers measured the same model the same week and got opposite answers: one found tasks 𝟕𝟎% more token heavy, another found them cheaper 📊 A new video analysis approach cut token use up to 𝟖𝟖%, putting long footage nobody watched within reach of a real question The rule underneath: a cost per task number is a statement about the task, not the model. If you have not measured it on your own work, you do not know the cost. Your move: 🔴 Pick the one AI job your business runs most often. 🔴 Run it twice, once on the cheapest model you have and once on the most expensive. 🔴 Compare the cost of a finished, usable output, not the cost per token. One job, not your whole stack. Ten copies of the priciest model, working hard on a task nobody checked. Check the task. 🎙️ Stream on: ▶️ Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@SMBAIHUB ▶️ Amazon Music: https://music.amazon.in/podcasts/b93fd52f-bc53-4ee9-98d7-3b9e10ea0e6f/ai-breakdown ▶️ Apple Podcast: https://podcasts.apple.com/in/podcast/ai-breakdown/id6799578599 ▶️ Web: smbaimagazine.com ▶️ Web: smbaipodcast.com Disclaimer: The information shared in this podcast is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered as direct financial or business advice. Always consult with a qualified professional for advice specific to your situation. This is an Independent commentary. Third-party excerpts are credited on screen or in the show notes. Some voices in this program are AI-generated.

  • #47
    September 17 · 12 min

    Your AI Is About to Stop Being a Private Conversation

    𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐦𝐨𝐬𝐭 𝐩𝐨𝐩𝐮𝐥𝐚𝐫 𝐨𝐩𝐞𝐧 𝐬𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐜𝐞 𝐀𝐈 𝐭𝐨𝐨𝐥 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐥𝐝 𝐰𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐬𝐢𝐥𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐬𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐧 𝐰𝐞𝐞𝐤𝐬, 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐧 𝐜𝐚𝐦𝐞 𝐛𝐚𝐜𝐤 𝐫𝐞𝐛𝐮𝐢𝐥𝐭 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐬𝐜𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐜𝐡. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐡𝐞𝐚𝐝𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐞 𝐟𝐞𝐚𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞 𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐧𝐞𝐚𝐭𝐡 𝐬𝐢𝐱𝐭𝐞𝐞𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐬𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐠𝐞𝐬 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐥𝐞𝐭𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐬𝐨𝐦𝐞𝐛𝐨𝐝𝐲 𝐞𝐥𝐬𝐞 𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐨 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐫𝐨𝐨𝐦. 😳 For two years it was one person, one window, one answer nobody else saw. That is ending. This week on 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐀𝐈 𝐁𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐤𝐝𝐨𝐰𝐧, Quentin and Stark continue the theme: 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐨𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐥 𝐥𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐀𝐈.The marquee feature is multiplayer: more than one person can open the same session, same agent, same context. One maintainer put the week in a sentence: the session stops being a private chat between one person and a model, and becomes shared work another trusted person can steer or take over. The session becomes the handover. Three signals somebody else is now in the room: 📊 📊 One lab opened AI text detection to regulators, media and fact checkers; somebody will run your copy through it, so decide what you disclose. 📊 A major provider is piloting pricing where you pay only when a task is judged done, so you agree upfront on done. 📊 Consumer AI platforms crossed 𝟒𝟓 𝐦𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐨𝐧 EU users and hit the strictest tier of rules; build on them, inherit their rules. For a small business, the shared session is the prize. What breaks when someone leaves is never the software, it is the reasoning nobody wrote down. Your move: 🔴 Take the last three things your business sent outside the building. 🔴 Run them through an AI detection check. 🔴 Then decide, once, what you disclose and what you do not. Things a customer or regulator could hold up, not internal notes. Private was a phase. Leave the door open. 🎙️ Stream on: ▶️ Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@SMBAIHUB ▶️ Amazon Music: https://music.amazon.in/podcasts/b93fd52f-bc53-4ee9-98d7-3b9e10ea0e6f/ai-breakdown ▶️ Apple Podcast: https://podcasts.apple.com/in/podcast/ai-breakdown/id6799578599 ▶️ Web: smbaimagazine.com ▶️ Web: smbaipodcast.com Disclaimer: The information shared in this podcast is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered as direct financial or business advice. Always consult with a qualified professional for advice specific to your situation. This is an Independent commentary. Third-party excerpts are credited on screen or in the show notes. Some voices in this program are AI-generated.

Showing 41–46 of 46 episodes