Skip to content
Artwork for Communication Breakdown
Communication Breakdown · October 8 · 35 min

Cornell’s Reckoning, Algorithmic ‘Gouging’

In this episode of Communication Breakdown, Steve Dowling and Craig Carroll examine two very different crises connected by a common question: what happens when trust in an institution or company is already under strain? They begin with Cornell University’s response to allegations that a student was drugged and sexually assaulted at a fraternity party, analyzing President Michael Kotlikoff’s delayed public statement, the university’s handling of the case, and the difference between promising future action and accounting for past decisions. Watch the full public statement from Cornell University's President, Michael Kotlikoff here: https://statements.cornell.edu/2026/20261003-commitment.cfm Then they turn to Walmart and McDonald’s as both companies push back against claims that artificial intelligence and consumer data could be used to manipulate prices. Across both stories, Steve and Craig explore credibility, accountability, narrative governance, and why organizational claims need to hold up against the systems and decisions behind them. Takeaways In a crisis involving serious harm, leadership communication must address what happened, what the organization did, and what has changed, rather than relying primarily on promises about the future. Independent scrutiny carries more credibility when organizational leaders openly subject their own decisions and roles to examination. AI-related communication increasingly requires companies to explain who controls the technology, what data it uses, what it is designed to optimize, and what limits protect consumers. Topics Mentioned crisis communication, sexual assault, university governance, leadership accountability, institutional trust, independent investigations, organizational culture, Greek life, reputational risk, transparency, legal risk, stakeholder trust, AI pricing, artificial intelligence, dynamic pricing, personalized pricing, surveillance pricing, consumer data, price optimization, narrative governance, investor communications, customer communications, franchise pricing, corporate accountability Companies Mentioned Cornell University, Kai Pi, Delta Delta Delta, CNN, Walmart, Reuters, McDonald’s Episode Hashtags #Cornell #CornellUniversity #Walmart #McDonalds #Reuters #CNN #CrisisCommunication #CorporateCommunications #PublicRelations #CorporateReputation #ReputationManagement #Leadership #Accountability #InstitutionalTrust #StakeholderTrust #OrganizationalCulture #ArtificialIntelligence #AI #AIPricing #DynamicPricing #ConsumerData #NarrativeGovernance #ConsumerTrust #ShawnPNeal #AdvoCast #OCRNetwork Communication Breakdown is a production of the Observatory on Corporate Reputation. Hosted by Craig Carroll and Steve Dowling. Produced in partnership with Advocast Leadership Advisory and Shawn P Neal. For questions, feedback, or episode suggestions, reach out at podcasts@ocrnetwork.com

0:00-35:56

transcript

No transcript — this publisher did not publish one.

show notes

In this episode of Communication Breakdown, Steve Dowling and Craig Carroll examine two very different crises connected by a common question: what happens when trust in an institution or company is already under strain? They begin with Cornell University’s response to allegations that a student was drugged and sexually assaulted at a fraternity party, analyzing President Michael Kotlikoff’s delayed public statement, the university’s handling of the case, and the difference between promising future action and accounting for past decisions.

Watch the full public statement from Cornell University's President, Michael Kotlikoff here:
https://statements.cornell.edu/2026/20261003-commitment.cfm

Then they turn to Walmart and McDonald’s as both companies push back against claims that artificial intelligence and consumer data could be used to manipulate prices. Across both stories, Steve and Craig explore credibility, accountability, narrative governance, and why organizational claims need to hold up against the systems and decisions behind them.

Takeaways
  • In a crisis involving serious harm, leadership communication must address what happened, what the organization did, and what has changed, rather than relying primarily on promises about the future.
  • Independent scrutiny carries more credibility when organizational leaders openly subject their own decisions and roles to examination.
  • AI-related communication increasingly requires companies to explain who controls the technology, what data it uses, what it is designed to optimize, and what limits protect consumers.
Topics Mentioned
crisis communication, sexual assault, university governance, leadership accountability, institutional trust, independent investigations, organizational culture, Greek life, reputational risk, transparency, legal risk, stakeholder trust, AI pricing, artificial intelligence, dynamic pricing, personalized pricing, surveillance pricing, consumer data, price optimization, narrative governance, investor communications, customer communications, franchise pricing, corporate accountability

Companies Mentioned
Cornell University, Kai Pi, Delta Delta Delta, CNN, Walmart, Reuters, McDonald’s

Episode Hashtags
#Cornell #CornellUniversity #Walmart #McDonalds #Reuters #CNN #CrisisCommunication #CorporateCommunications #PublicRelations #CorporateReputation #ReputationManagement #Leadership #Accountability #InstitutionalTrust #StakeholderTrust #OrganizationalCulture #ArtificialIntelligence #AI #AIPricing #DynamicPricing #ConsumerData #NarrativeGovernance #ConsumerTrust #ShawnPNeal #AdvoCast #OCRNetwork

Communication Breakdown is a production of the Observatory on Corporate Reputation.
Hosted by Craig Carroll and Steve Dowling.
Produced in partnership with Advocast Leadership Advisory and  Shawn P Neal.

For questions, feedback, or episode suggestions, reach out at podcasts@ocrnetwork.com
links4

more episodes

All episodes